MattusMaximus
Intellectual Gladiator
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2006
- Messages
- 15,948
True. Peer reviewed synthesis paper. One where the peer review went so badly, co-authors dropped off the team completely then started writing rebuttals themselves! and Briske himself was forced to write a new paper just 3 years later taking steps backwards. Why? Because all that pesky "anecdotal" evidence keeps getting in the way of his nice clean synthesis. I am looking forward to his next paper, maybe he'll be down to just one co-author by then!![]()
Although testimonials and anecdotal reports of the benefits of rotational grazing are abundant, systematic assessments and documentation are lacking; the number of cases where it has been either successful or unsuccessful is unknown. We advocate that this disconnect between management and scientific knowledge must be addressed to provide appropriate, consistent, and defensible grazing management recommenda- tions and policies and to generate more useful knowledge of complex adaptive systems
Feel free to post more.
I had a customer in my shop this morning casually ask why there was nothing in the paper about U.S. soldiers drawing down on peaceful citizens in Nevada. I responded, politely, that the BLM LEO's are not U.S. soldiers and that they had received veiled threats in the lead up to this event.
He told me that they were actually U.S. military disguised as LOE's.
I had a customer in my shop this morning casually ask why there was nothing in the paper about U.S. soldiers drawing down on peaceful citizens in Nevada. I responded, politely, that the BLM LEO's are not U.S. soldiers and that they had received veiled threats in the lead up to this event.
He told me that they were actually U.S. military disguised as LOE's.
I really hope those guys resist when the FBI comes for them next week.
What the hell, no. I hope they're all taken easily, sobbing quietly, and are quickly forgotten. The last thing I hope for is violence where innocent people could be hurt and people can rally behind.
I really hope those guys resist when the FBI comes for them next week.
That whole post is a huge pile of woo. First off you simply lied in your first couple of so called "facts". I have already posted proof of that, so you know better. Then you follow with a strawman. The point is that Bundy was never given any options beneficial to him. The BLM tried to force him into making a choice between bad or worse. No one knows if he was given a choice to actually use grazing to restore the range if he would have accepted that option, because that option was never given him.Yea really walking it backwards.
There is not any scientific evidence for holistic grazing. Fact.
The father of holistic grazing claims for some reason that it defies science. Fact.
There is no reason to believe that cliven bundy would have taken to holistic grazing or that offering it would have lead to a different out come. Fact.
Eta: on another note isn't it interesting how actual scientists are willing look at new information and reevaluate their positions based on evidence? Unlike Allan savory who simply insist he is always right, despite the evidence.
That whole post is a huge pile of woo. First off you simply lied in your first couple of so called "facts". I have already posted proof of that, so you know better. Then you follow with a strawman. The point is that Bundy was never given any options beneficial to him. The BLM tried to force him into making a choice between bad or worse. No one knows if he was given a choice to actually use grazing to restore the range if he would have accepted that option, because that option was never given him.
The point is completely relevant to the situation now. Back ANYONE into a corner with only bad options, and a % are likely to react belligerently. It's just human nature.
Back that statement with evidence please. Where is the evidence of the beneficial option being given to Bundy which he stubbornly refused?Bundy wasn't backed into a corner, he walked into it all by himself.
I hope they get charged with and convicted of a felony - any felony. Then it will be illegal for them to own guns for the rest of their lives. That'll be worse than having their wee-wee cut off.I really hope those guys resist when the FBI comes for them next week.
Back that statement with evidence please. Where is the evidence of the beneficial option being given to Bundy which he stubbornly refused?
Please look up "shifting the burden of proof".
Your claim, you're required to support the statement that the decision was arbitrary. Preferably in a thread where it will be on topic.