Jello is basically transparent, except for the coloring agents they add to make it visually appealing. Regular gellatin (sp?) has a slightly amber cast, but is transparent. I wonder if better processing could remove the last traces of color and leave you with a water-clear gel?
Gummy bears are transparent if you cut a section out of them with a sharp knife. What makes them translucent is the surface imperfections and the powdered sugar (or whatever it is) that they dust them with to keep them from sticking together. Transparency depends a lot on the surface of the object. The only difference between window glass and ground glass is that one has a surface that's been modified with some abrasive compound. So, your transparent fruit would need a hi-polish surface or skin, which wouldn't be too unlikely, considering how the skin of an apple looks.
A transparent fruit wouldn't be invisible, just like a clear glass object isn't invisible. You can see it by how light interacts with the surfaces. To make it closer to invisible, it would need to be the same refractive index of whatever liquid or gas it was immersed in. National Geographic had an article on gemstones where it showed a real diamond and a YaG simulated stone side by side. In air, they looked the same, but when immersed in mineral oil, the YaG basically went flat and transparent (though still detectable) while the diamond still glittered. And even assuming that the fruit matched the atmosphere's refractive index, you could still find it visually by the same way you can find a large glass wall in front of you: by the dust, dirt, and surface contaminants sticking to it.
Or by hitting your nose against it while walking.
Are we talking a gaseous atmosphere, or a liquid environment? Once again, National Geographic had an article on transparent ocean creatures (like jellyfish) that were hard to see and could only be found by the junk sticking to them. To photograph them, the divers used flash units set at an oblique angle to light up the diffusing structures in the organisms.
Why bother with a solid fruit? How about a gaseous fruit, like a balloon filled with dust-like seeds or spores? The wind could carry such a fruit a long way, which would then pop and disperse the spores. Or perhaps the inflating gas could have an appealing odor (sweet, or possibly like rotting meat to attract carrion eaters) that would attract some vector, which would burst the fruit and get dusted with spores? Or maybe the inflating gas could be lighter than air, and the fruit could drift off in the air until it reached the altitude where the membrane would rupture from expansion? Think of the rain of decending ruptured skins during the fall season, like countless cast-off condoms drifting down on the breeze.
Ummmmm. Then again, don't think of that. Amazing where a train of thought will go before it derails.
Regards;
Beanbag