• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Youtube truther comments

Spanx said:
Who are the others that say? Would that be Harrit and Jones speaking amongst the secret circle of YouTube.

If Millette set out to fail surely he could cover his tracks better than that.


My unprofessional opinion would say he/she is full of crap. If I recall, Jones says Millette had the wrong chips yet opgladio says he he had the right chips but set out to fail ? Why can't they get their story straight.
Click to expand...

They're saying the same thing about us. I wish I had the expertise to analyse his or her counter arguments.
 
Last edited:
HotRodDeluxe said:
They're saying the same thing about us. I wish I had the expertise to analyse his or her counter arguments.
Click to expand...

I think you will find James Millette has done the work for you. Even if you studied the subject for the next ten years you will only be told you are a shill.

If you read the comments on this you can see how shallow truther arguments are. I would say Opgladio is as shallow as Ziggi.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLyYv5Y2YSM&feature
 
I would say Opgladio is using nothing more than a distraction tak tik to send you down the rabbit hole.

What others say or what instruments could do, doesn't really cut the mustard without facts.
 
Basically every single day I have to deal with truther comments on my Youtube videos. Right now I am dealing with some on my video "9/11: What You Don't Know is Killing People ": http://youtu.be/k80lVl7yKlU
Here are some of the latest:
commentOct15.png

commets2.png

commets3.png

This is what I am asking him to look at, a link I put in the video description: https://sites.google.com/site/911conspiracydebunked/wtc-5
I put a lot of information in the video description yet I continually am asked about things which are answered in the video description.
 
Last edited:
I used to post on Youtube and IMDB a lot, mostly lurk just now. However on IMDB I have quite an archive of Truther gold....yes I agree Youtube Truthers are the worst. Here are my archives:

In an emergency situation, who are people going to count on when the elevators malfunction? It is their Fn civil duty to stay the H in there and get people out. The fire dept sure as H didn't fiddle around in the lobby and quibble over whether or not they wanted to get up there and save people from smoke inhalation. The elevator techs have the same obligation. They saved NO ONE. - User JSSTyger at IMDB

I think you better also consider the fact that United 93 had two separated tail numbers on Sept. 10th and Sept. 11th. I'd like to know that explanation. This is logged by the BTS. Also you have a pilot who swore on his grave that he piloted UA 93 AFTER 911 and he KEPT LOGS of all of his flight information. Also, you have a NY Giants player who saw flight 93 loading people ON THE TARMAC at 6:45 IN THE MORNING. The Giants took an early morning flight back from a monday night game in Denver. ...ALLLLSO you have Cleveland MAYOR Michael White saying flight 93 landed at Hopkins International Airport. - User JSSTyger at IMDB

evidence? Oh sorry, I was not on the plane...duh. Of course there is no evidence. I just use common sense, you know. I don't just eat everything that is fed to me, unlike most people. - User sktELEMENT at IMDB

For the purpose of entertainment, I'd like to use the same trick from Shake: Show your math to prove that I am a numbskull. Show your math. Show your math. - McMike on IMDB

Get a cigarette lighter and hold it to a spoon. It wouldn't matter if you kept it there for a week it wouldn't melt it. - entrancify from IMDB

I don't have a number for you and I don't claim to be a physicist, I just know from looking at every other building fire in history, that what happened with WTC7 is *physically impossible* without the use of detonators.- RonPaul2008 from IMDB

User Aanthanur at YouTube explains why he researches conspiracy theories, to find errors...he might want to check his spelling for errors first : "actually i did some research, thats why i foudn somany errors in rkowens videos."

User enomarekim from YouTube speculates about the phone calls from F93: "If this is true , then the cell phone calls telling the story of patriotic heroism may have been synthycized, especially since cell phones didn't work above 8,000 feet in 2001, although I dont know how high up they were."

User webfairy at YouTube's hypothesis about how the government planted fake human remains at the Pentagon site: "People got ashes from stolen bodies various funeralgate cemetaries were too cheap to bury"

our self clening over does not reach temperatures above 500 degrees and the fires in the tower were much above 500 degrees. DID someone fly a plane into your oven? No logic here at all - User Kyles45angel at YouTube

[A CTist describing the crash of Flight 93] - If thats true then that airplane and everybody on it might be dead from shock but they should be perfectly preserved because you can't have fire underground with no oxygen.But I never saw those pictures. – User SlimJim06 at YouTube

A Boeing 757 (empty) weighs 60 tons. Second: the weight of each tower was 500,000 ton. So extra weight was as low as 0.012%. Assuming man's weight 200 pounds, 0.012% is equal to 0.024 pound or third of ounce. So a pack of cigarettes in our pocket makes you fall down? So sad. Not funny. – User “psyopagent” at YouTube

A CTist attempts to explain a controlled test to model the impact of airliners into the WTC towers…..“Think of an aluminum can, empty or filled, striking a steel pipe at high velocity, with walls of the pipe being proportionally thicker than the walls of the can, as the proportions of the box column steel thickness compared to thickness of the wing aluminum.” – From user “spooked” at huminteventsonline

Another CTist explains in detail this highly controlled test:….” it is easily testable, and i have done so: stand an empty beer can (representing a 767 fuselage) on a BBQ grill (representing wtc perimeter columns) on 2 red bricks (steel reinforced concrete wtc floors) onto an iron fireplace grate (massive wtc core columns). Smash the beer can with a sledge hammer (representing the force that alleged 500mph momentum would generate). Observe how little (none!) of the beer can actually penetrates thru the BBQ grill. Replace the 2 red bricks (now cracked) with 2 fresh bricks and use a full beer can lying on it's side (representing a 767 wing with full fuel tanks). Again smash and observe! stand the whole affair on edge and we have a far more accurate model of a real aluminum 767 (with a plastic nosecone) striking a massive steel and concrete wtc than either the bogus NIST diagrams or equally bogus fag purdue animation.” – User “anonymous” at huminteventsonline

the wtc was a demolition they had bombs put in ther so the towers would fall down not fall over sidways and kill all of the other buildings – user “nobish” from YouTube

You debunkers are a bunch of pricks. People who do beleive in the truth are all nutters and *beep* to you yet you take your time on here to debunk our B.S. – mr gregson

then how do you explain all of the expolosives inside the towers??? ..there were witnesess ...man this was just an inside job ..everybody benefited in the us gov off of this ..stop trying to oppose .! – user “dynamki9” from YouTube

youtube evidence& is important….all i've got is youtube evidence, interested or not? – ivan sapp

Plus the CIA used many technologies to hinder the explosions from making larger sounds, so people falsely thought it was a natural fire demolition, which it aint was. – steffenebbesen1984

You debunkers can do all you want with your science and proof, it dosent change the fact that 9/11 was an inside job, &loose change& says so. – steffenebbesen1984

I propose getting a steel beam, or other solid heavy object, and attaching some dust to it, then throwing it over a cliff to see what happens. – Ace Baker (from JREF Forum)

I have never even heard of this person, but if she was a capitlist she should have been delt with approprietely. – Sensitivity

there are a lot of people on this board who are very immmature, hateful, christian and capitalists and racist as well. – Sensitivity

Go **** yourself you fake illuminti agent scum. – Clara0618

And dont give me too much information. I dont have the time to verify all of this. I dont care about the smoke or the 20 story hole. That doesnt make a building come down at freefall speed. So that proofs nothing – jealousgotmestrapped

A CTist’s highly technical description of the WTC1&2 “CD”: “First step: Good old Las-Vegas-style controlled demolition on the top part. Second step: More exotic stringed-firecrackers-style controlled demolition on the bottom part”. – knight-in-black-leather

You can pour tons of jet fuel on your oven at home-and it won’t collapse – A CTist

Only fools makes claims about things they don't understand - hempforvictory1942
 
I used to post on Youtube and IMDB a lot, mostly lurk just now. However on IMDB I have quite an archive of Truther gold....yes I agree Youtube Truthers are the worst. Here are my archives:

In an emergency situation, who are people going to count on when the elevators malfunction? It is their Fn civil duty to stay the H in there and get people out. The fire dept sure as H didn't fiddle around in the lobby and quibble over whether or not they wanted to get up there and save people from smoke inhalation. The elevator techs have the same obligation. They saved NO ONE. - User JSSTyger at IMDB

I think you better also consider the fact that United 93 had two separated tail numbers on Sept. 10th and Sept. 11th. I'd like to know that explanation. This is logged by the BTS. Also you have a pilot who swore on his grave that he piloted UA 93 AFTER 911 and he KEPT LOGS of all of his flight information. Also, you have a NY Giants player who saw flight 93 loading people ON THE TARMAC at 6:45 IN THE MORNING. The Giants took an early morning flight back from a monday night game in Denver. ...ALLLLSO you have Cleveland MAYOR Michael White saying flight 93 landed at Hopkins International Airport. - User JSSTyger at IMDB

evidence? Oh sorry, I was not on the plane...duh. Of course there is no evidence. I just use common sense, you know. I don't just eat everything that is fed to me, unlike most people. - User sktELEMENT at IMDB

For the purpose of entertainment, I'd like to use the same trick from Shake: Show your math to prove that I am a numbskull. Show your math. Show your math. - McMike on IMDB

Get a cigarette lighter and hold it to a spoon. It wouldn't matter if you kept it there for a week it wouldn't melt it. - entrancify from IMDB

I don't have a number for you and I don't claim to be a physicist, I just know from looking at every other building fire in history, that what happened with WTC7 is *physically impossible* without the use of detonators.- RonPaul2008 from IMDB

User Aanthanur at YouTube explains why he researches conspiracy theories, to find errors...he might want to check his spelling for errors first : "actually i did some research, thats why i foudn somany errors in rkowens videos."

User enomarekim from YouTube speculates about the phone calls from F93: "If this is true , then the cell phone calls telling the story of patriotic heroism may have been synthycized, especially since cell phones didn't work above 8,000 feet in 2001, although I dont know how high up they were."

User webfairy at YouTube's hypothesis about how the government planted fake human remains at the Pentagon site: "People got ashes from stolen bodies various funeralgate cemetaries were too cheap to bury"

our self clening over does not reach temperatures above 500 degrees and the fires in the tower were much above 500 degrees. DID someone fly a plane into your oven? No logic here at all - User Kyles45angel at YouTube

[A CTist describing the crash of Flight 93] - If thats true then that airplane and everybody on it might be dead from shock but they should be perfectly preserved because you can't have fire underground with no oxygen.But I never saw those pictures. – User SlimJim06 at YouTube

A Boeing 757 (empty) weighs 60 tons. Second: the weight of each tower was 500,000 ton. So extra weight was as low as 0.012%. Assuming man's weight 200 pounds, 0.012% is equal to 0.024 pound or third of ounce. So a pack of cigarettes in our pocket makes you fall down? So sad. Not funny. – User “psyopagent” at YouTube

A CTist attempts to explain a controlled test to model the impact of airliners into the WTC towers…..“Think of an aluminum can, empty or filled, striking a steel pipe at high velocity, with walls of the pipe being proportionally thicker than the walls of the can, as the proportions of the box column steel thickness compared to thickness of the wing aluminum.” – From user “spooked” at huminteventsonline

Another CTist explains in detail this highly controlled test:….” it is easily testable, and i have done so: stand an empty beer can (representing a 767 fuselage) on a BBQ grill (representing wtc perimeter columns) on 2 red bricks (steel reinforced concrete wtc floors) onto an iron fireplace grate (massive wtc core columns). Smash the beer can with a sledge hammer (representing the force that alleged 500mph momentum would generate). Observe how little (none!) of the beer can actually penetrates thru the BBQ grill. Replace the 2 red bricks (now cracked) with 2 fresh bricks and use a full beer can lying on it's side (representing a 767 wing with full fuel tanks). Again smash and observe! stand the whole affair on edge and we have a far more accurate model of a real aluminum 767 (with a plastic nosecone) striking a massive steel and concrete wtc than either the bogus NIST diagrams or equally bogus fag purdue animation.” – User “anonymous” at huminteventsonline

the wtc was a demolition they had bombs put in ther so the towers would fall down not fall over sidways and kill all of the other buildings – user “nobish” from YouTube

You debunkers are a bunch of pricks. People who do beleive in the truth are all nutters and *beep* to you yet you take your time on here to debunk our B.S. – mr gregson

then how do you explain all of the expolosives inside the towers??? ..there were witnesess ...man this was just an inside job ..everybody benefited in the us gov off of this ..stop trying to oppose .! – user “dynamki9” from YouTube

youtube evidence& is important….all i've got is youtube evidence, interested or not? – ivan sapp

Plus the CIA used many technologies to hinder the explosions from making larger sounds, so people falsely thought it was a natural fire demolition, which it aint was. – steffenebbesen1984

You debunkers can do all you want with your science and proof, it dosent change the fact that 9/11 was an inside job, &loose change& says so. – steffenebbesen1984

I propose getting a steel beam, or other solid heavy object, and attaching some dust to it, then throwing it over a cliff to see what happens. – Ace Baker (from JREF Forum)

I have never even heard of this person, but if she was a capitlist she should have been delt with approprietely. – Sensitivity

there are a lot of people on this board who are very immmature, hateful, christian and capitalists and racist as well. – Sensitivity

Go **** yourself you fake illuminti agent scum. – Clara0618

And dont give me too much information. I dont have the time to verify all of this. I dont care about the smoke or the 20 story hole. That doesnt make a building come down at freefall speed. So that proofs nothing – jealousgotmestrapped

A CTist’s highly technical description of the WTC1&2 “CD”: “First step: Good old Las-Vegas-style controlled demolition on the top part. Second step: More exotic stringed-firecrackers-style controlled demolition on the bottom part”. – knight-in-black-leather

You can pour tons of jet fuel on your oven at home-and it won’t collapse – A CTist

Only fools makes claims about things they don't understand - hempforvictory1942
 
Jeppe Severin Jayakrishnan, molten iron spheres confirmed. Not that they all are direct proof of thermite, but a nano-thermitic material that CREATES the molten iron droplets found have also been found. Scientific fact. Some of these droplet have even been found "half baked" attached to one of the red/gray chips. So...

Could you please make a video in which you confront this man and tell to his face that he is lying? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQrpLp-X0ws

That would be sooooo cool.

After that, make a video where you confront THIS man @ 6:57 and call him "idiot":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQrpLp-X0ws

I Dare you.
Click to expand...

It looks like truthers have changed their view that iron microspheres are only created from a thermite reaction. I would like to see any evidence that the "half baked droplet" was caused by a thermite reaction.

I have not viewed the youtube clips that Jep wants people to watch but I assume it will be Neils Harrit or Steven Jones.who of course we know will not respond to any challenge of their work unless it is peer reviewed which leads me to believe that Jep thinks youtube is peer reviewed.

LMFAO

The source of Jeps comment was ae911truth facebook
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom