Yet another Truther Tirade - any takers?

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

BoneZ

Today, 6:22 PM
Post #78
Posts:717
Group:Members
Member#269
Joined:02/03/08


Looks like there are quite a few of them reading this thread now. I doubt they will come here. They are "safe" and "comfortable" in their biased, and completely unobjectively-ran forum. Coming here to debate real facts would put them out of their comfort zone.

Not to mention not a single person I present facts to can debunk them anyway.

"They are "safe" and "comfortable" in their biased, and completely unobjectively-ran forum."

Very much like you punks over at the LC: AAC forum, Bonz! You guys come over here to lurk & then bitch about it back over in your lame forum. We have no time to make accounts over at the LC forum because all you paranoid idiots want us immediately banned from there because all of you are suck-ups to Dylan Avery, Richard Gage & Steven Jones. You people can't handle the physical evidence that 9/11's not an "Inside Job".

So go on, go back to "Loser Central: Anonymous Anti-Semetic Conspiratists" forum.

 

[T.A.M.]

Chewy;

Rise above man...they are the 6 year olds trying taunt people. Most people who come here realize that while the treatment they get from members will vary, the moderators and admins enforce the rules fair handed.

They are projecting. They are the ones with all of these theories to prove, yet 8 years later, what have they done? They are disappointed in themselves, and need to lash out.

TAM

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Chewy;

Rise above man...they are the 6 year olds trying taunt people. Most people who come here realize that while the treatment they get from members will vary, the moderators and admins enforce the rules fair handed.

They are projecting. They are the ones with all of these theories to prove, yet 8 years later, what have they done? They are disappointed in themselves, and need to lash out.

TAM

So very true TAM!

8 yrs. of telling & retelling the same lame theories, their minds were made up since before the dust settled.

 

[332nd]

It's funny cuz their thread about this thread is likely the most traffic that site has had this month.

 

[The Big Dog]

Anyhow, I pointed out Bonez is a coward, Duffman can't keep his own hero's latest lies straight, Dom is a skin head and JFK and the other knuckleheads have killed that board by banning anyone who does not toe the line and by sucking up to the no plane at the Pentagon crowd.

Did you hear that JFK broke his nose? Yeah Craig Marquis stopped suddenly and JFK's nose crashed right into Craig's tailbone.

 

[alienentity]

Anyhow, I pointed out Bonez is a coward, Duffman can't keep his own hero's latest lies straight, Dom is a skin head and JFK and the other knuckleheads have killed that board by banning anyone who does not toe the line and by sucking up to the no plane at the Pentagon crowd.

Did you hear that JFK broke his nose? Yeah Craig Marquis stopped suddenly and JFK's nose crashed right into Craig's tailbone.

If this is turning into a juvenile insult-fest then there's no room for intelligent discussion. I don't care whether it's here or somewhere else, the result is the same.

Besides, if you keep this up, the mods will get you!!

 

[TheDaver]

"They are "safe" and "comfortable" in their biased, and completely unobjectively-ran forum."

Couldn’t find a better example of projection^WP if I looked for one.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Couldn’t find a better example of projection^WP if I looked for one.

That's Bonez from the LC:AAC forum for ya!

 

[McHrozni]

I especially liked this part:

Translation: Something falling doesn't start at terminal velocity outside of a vacuum.

Considering that the terminal velocity in a vacuum is the speed of light, I strongly suspect this guy doesn't even know what terminal velocity is. Or vacuum, for that matter.

McHrozni

 

[The Big Dog]

If this is turning into a juvenile insult-fest then there's no room for intelligent discussion. I don't care whether it's here or somewhere else, the result is the same.

Besides, if you keep this up, the mods will get you!!

Meh, actually the mods frown on cross board conversations.

Tell Duffman to join here or tell him to STFU.

 

[jaydeehess]

Well there have now been several posts directly addressing the items brought up and so far all the OP has for arguement is personal incredulity and utter misunderstanding(or deliberate misrepresentation) of the scientific and technical matters at hand.

I used to post at LCF, I was banned for daring to contend that killtown was wrong. This was of course well before killtown was banned there.
Rather disingenuous of the mods there to want debunkers to sign up only to ban them for nothing more than disagreeing with the truther consensus there. (Similar occurs at PfT forums)

 

[jaydeehess]

I especially liked this part:

Translation: Something falling doesn't start at terminal velocity outside of a vacuum.

Considering that the terminal velocity in a vacuum is the speed of light, I strongly suspect this guy doesn't even know what terminal velocity is. Or vacuum, for that matter.

McHrozni

lol, I originally missed the vacuum part of the sentence.
If 'falling" is defined as an object moving under the influence of a gravitational force then in a vacuum 'terminal velocity' is completely meaningless since eventually its going to impact the mass responsible for the gravitational attraction AND the object will be acellerating until the impact.

As I said, the poster is creating a word salad and hoping few will notice that he does not actually understand squat.

If 'falling' is defined simply as an object experiencing a force then if that force is kept constant, yes, the 'terminal velocity' would be the speed of light (at least as an upper limit that it can approach but never acheive as its acelleration approaches, but technically never reaches, zero)


requires an infinite source of on-board fuel and other impossibilities, but that never stops a TM

 

[alienentity]

Duffman1013 - any issues you want to discuss, do it here.

I have been very clear that I am not returning to LCF. And JFK has still failed to address his comments against Ryan Mackey, either here or elsewhere that I'm aware.

Cat got his tongue? I have all the info waiting for him when and if he chooses to take responsibility for what he writes. He took a position, he made a statement, and by now he must know that it was not the correct position, but is unwilling to man-up and admit it.

I'm not an admin on this forum. He's an admin on LCF. You see the problem? I challenge JFK to meet me on an equal playing field, where he's not in control, and restate his position about Ryan Mackey's CV.

So far, the only statement produced by JFK regarding the subject was:
''Unh huh... Absolutely nothing there about architectural engineering or Physics.

http://www.911myths.com/html/ryan_mackey.html''

C'mon JFK, this is going to look very bad for you if you can't deal with your own claims. You don't control the internet, you don't control me, and you don't control what's true and what isn't. Outside LCF, you are very weak, my friend.
So weak you can't even defend your own writing.

At least I had the guts to show up on your forum where you allowed people to post vulgar personal attacks with impunity. Much more than you've done. (or probably will)

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Duffman1013

Today, 6:32 AM
Post #85
Posts:49
Group:Members
Member#1,269
Joined:08/06/09

Quick check of JREF... (only ever knew it was there because of Stundie)... today we have a 75% chance of whining, mostly cloudy thinking, and the inability to confront people on their own level. This weatherman doesn't choose to go to JREF because his hipwaders have a hole worn in the bottom, and why the hell does it seem like it's the AV kids in high school whining about the jocks and how they are so mean to them? Holy crap, I just realized that...

LOL @ Duffman!

He basically told everyone there that he "whines, has cloudy thinking, and has the inability to confront people on their own level."

Bravo Duffy, bravo!

 

[scissorhands]

Duffman1013 - any issues you want to discuss, do it here.

I have been very clear that I am not returning to LCF. And JFK has still failed to address his comments against Ryan Mackey, either here or elsewhere that I'm aware.

Cat got his tongue? I have all the info waiting for him when and if he chooses to take responsibility for what he writes. He took a position, he made a statement, and by now he must know that it was not the correct position, but is unwilling to man-up and admit it.

I'm not an admin on this forum. He's an admin on LCF. You see the problem? I challenge JFK to meet me on an equal playing field, where he's not in control, and restate his position about Ryan Mackey's CV.

So far, the only statement produced by JFK regarding the subject was:
''Unh huh... Absolutely nothing there about architectural engineering or Physics.

http://www.911myths.com/html/ryan_mackey.html''

C'mon JFK, this is going to look very bad for you if you can't deal with your own claims. You don't control the internet, you don't control me, and you don't control what's true and what isn't. Outside LCF, you are very weak, my friend.
So weak you can't even defend your own writing.

At least I had the guts to show up on your forum where you allowed people to post vulgar personal attacks with impunity. Much more than you've done. (or probably will)

JFK?
That moron will never venture out from his safety zone on LCF.
He needs his ban hammer for when debates arent going his way.
Its funny that the only traffic that site ever gets these days is when someone from here references it.
Hes still there, in the crypt of 9/11 troof, day in day out,monitoring the tiny number of truthers who post there.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

JFK?
That moron will never venture out from his safety zone on LCF.
He needs his ban hammer for when debates arent going his way.
Its funny that the only traffic that site ever gets these days is when someone from here references it.
Hes still there, in the crypt of 9/11 troof, day in day out,monitoring the tiny number of truthers who post there.

I feel honored to get banned over there for asking a simple question!

They have such a nerve, I hope their Christmas is a sour one! They don't deserve a lump of coal to warm their cold hearts.

 

[TheDaver]

It really, really goes to show how a lot of internet communities are just places for the mentally ill to share and reinforce their delusions.…

 

[Edx]

3) NIST says that pancaking of floors did not occur.

LOL no they didnt.

Fail.

 

[alienentity]

I just received a message from this same truther, who goes by the handle
Diosdebaca on youtube, and Duffman1013 on LCF.

He blusters 'Aight, if you want to debate, big boy, fine,' then lays out this fiction about this thread 'which got cockblocked and closed by the admins there, because you and Chewy are the biggest losers since the Broadway hit "Leonardo!"'

So I guess he has to pretend (to youtube users, that is) that JREF closed this thread down, as a phony excuse not to show up here and present his views.

That's one bald-faced lie. He then offers yet another lie that I've been banned at LCF - I haven't, because I haven't broken their terms of use guidelines, nor have I even been warned.

And these guys wonder what's rotten in Denmark? It's themselves.....

btw, I'm not suggesting a flame war with LCF. Far from it. I've invited Duffman to debate here if he wants, but I'm not going back to LCF as I mentioned, as they're not enforcing their policy against personal attacks. I got tired of this double-standard.

The youtube video in question is titled 'A response to David Chandler's Nutty Claims'

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rrWkmvmA5U

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

I just received a message from this same truther, who goes by the handle
Diosdebaca on youtube, and Duffman1013 on LCF.

He blusters 'Aight, if you want to debate, big boy, fine,' then lays out this fiction about this thread 'which got cockblocked and closed by the admins there, because you and Chewy are the biggest losers since the Broadway hit "Leonardo!"'

So I guess he has to pretend (to youtube users, that is) that JREF closed this thread down, as a phony excuse not to show up here and present his views.

That's one bald-faced lie. He then offers yet another lie that I've been banned at LCF - I haven't, because I haven't broken their terms of use guidelines, nor have I even been warned.

And these guys wonder what's rotten in Denmark? It's themselves.....

btw, I'm not suggesting a flame war with LCF. Far from it. I've invited Duffman to debate here if he wants, but I'm not going back to LCF as I mentioned, as they're not enforcing their policy against personal attacks. I got tired of this double-standard.

The youtube video in question is titled 'A response to David Chandler's Nutty Claims'

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rrWkmvmA5U

Well that settles everything, looks like you & I are a big hit over at "Loser Central: All American ****suckers Forum"

I love being a pain in their behinds!

Yeah, they have too many double-standards for their rules. The Admins there basically won't let anyone speak their minds, they let noone have their Freedom of Speech, & they abuse their power.

And they have the balls to say that the Government's corrupt? LOL! They're just as corrupt, probably worse because they act like a bunch of Neo-Nazis & Racists.

I'm known as "WhyAskQuestions" on YouTube.