• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Yet another Killtown expose....

TC329 said:
1) I have nothing to do with the page. You need to contact either KT or Roxdog and ask them.

2) "spamming"? I'm not quite sure where KT is posting all of this info. He is his own person.

3) How does he tie this to his 9/11 Theories?

4) I can see why members of the Truth movement would want to bring awareness to this cold case. Her professor was the only suspect ever named to date. He is an expert on OBL and has top secret clearance at the Pentagon. OBL is a long time CIA asset and Bush family friend. Her thesis written about him has been kept as evidence or otherwise it would have been turned over to her family as a personal belonging. So I can understand why alot of people would be interested in this case.
Click to expand...

So do you think that OBL planned the 9/11 attacks?
 
jhunter1163 said:
I can't wait to see how the JREFers who are attorneys reply to this assertion.
Click to expand...

don't have to be an attorney, but the image belongs to whomever took it. There's an automatic copyright attributed to it. and its for 75 years plus the life of the person who owns it. So unless the photographer is dead and its the year 2082 , no its not in the public domain. That's the soonest it will be "available" in the public domain. If the photographer is still alive, then the wait is much longer.
 
Arus808 said:
don't have to be an attorney, but the image belongs to whomever took it. There's an automatic copyright attributed to it. and its for 75 years plus the life of the person who owns it. So unless the photographer is dead and its the year 2082 , no its not in the public domain. That's the soonest it will be "available" in the public domain. If the photographer is still alive, then the wait is much longer.
Click to expand...

The only other way that it can be in the public domain is if the copyright owner specificially states that the picture in question is in the public domain, so, unless you show evidence that the owner has given the pic to public domain, the claim is hogwash.
 
Calcas said:
That's because "terrorcell" is one of the OG over there. You and roxdog post the most vile stuff and do it with impunity. Posts that clearly violate the TOS are left alone while skeptics are banned for simply disagreeing.

Go figure.
Click to expand...


"vile"?

You're more than welcome to register there anytime you want. I am always willing to engage any skeptic in debate. Please PM me and I will more than willingly debate on Flight 93 or we can debate any topic of your choosing in the skeptics forum. I will ask (since I have no powers) that you not be banned provided you don't troll around. Naturally if you're spamming up the board with insults and firing off personal attacks on members you will be dealt with in the way the administration seems fit. I can't control anything over there but I do support open dialogue amongst both sides. There are some people who do register for the sole purpose of disrupting conversations or simply firing off insults as a rebuttal. I can't condone that and I always try my best to not act in such manner. You're free to hate my political views, you're free to hate me as a human being, but not one of you who have ever shown me respect has been given anything less in return and that you cannot deny.
 
Arus808 said:
I disproved the connection in my blog (you know the part where its says --- and he LOOSELY ties her murder because she so happened to be doing a thesis paper on Osama Bin Laden! Um...yeah, cause the teacher she was taking a class from, happens to be a person who has researched OBL before. So, he "believes' her death has to do with OBL. -- ) . KT doesn't know what her thesis stated, so making a claim that her death has to do with OBL and her thesis, is false. Anyone with a brain can put the facts together themselves and realize that KT is just spouting crap, as he usually does.

I dont have to refute anything, when the facts does a find job of doing that on its own.

And I thought, you said you wouldn't talk to people who censor. So why did you post a reply to me? And why do you continue to post at the Loose Change forum (where censorship is part of their modus operandi)?

Hypocrite should be tattooed to your forehead.
Click to expand...


You don't know what was contained in her thesis neither so making a claim that her death had nothing to do with OBl and her thesis is false.

She was not robbed, she was not raped, and I don't know of any serial killers who MO matches this incident in that area around this time. Her brutal murder is quite odd. It is very rare that someone just randomly stabs someone to death in such a violent manner. It was a total overkill. Seems like a personal vendetta.
 
Arus808 said:
And get banned even before posting anything at all?
that's a waste of time.
Click to expand...

Whatever, I don't have time to play this cat and mouse game with you. I would have been better off sticking to my original statement and just ignoring you......
 
TC329 said:
Whatever, I don't have time to play this cat and mouse game with you. I would have been better off sticking to my original statement and just ignoring you......
Click to expand...

TC -

Do you post at the LC Forums?

Are you aware that they ban people who simply disagree with the conspiracy theory?

Are you aware that they remove posts and/or threads?
 
TC329 said:
Whatever, I don't have time to play this cat and mouse game with you. I would have been better off sticking to my original statement and just ignoring you......
Click to expand...

Déjà v--: The feeling that you've been ignored like this before.
 
TC329 said:
You don't know what was contained in her thesis neither so making a claim that her death had nothing to do with OBl and her thesis is false.
Click to expand...

Again, her thesis could have been about the 1993 bombings. Its unfounded speculation on Killtowns' part to try and tie it to 911 (remember his blog on her is entitled "Yale student's '98 murder linked to 9/11?" ). Im going off his claims and what was found at the Wiki article (for which your ilk tried to vandalize)

She was not robbed, she was not raped, and I don't know of any serial killers who MO matches this incident in that area around this time. Her brutal murder is quite odd. It is very rare that someone just randomly stabs someone to death in such a violent manner. It was a total overkill. Seems like a personal vendetta.
Click to expand...

Which is why most murders are actually committed by people the victim knew either closely or intimately.

She was stabbed over 17 times, which is more indicative of a crime of passion or someone who acted out of anger (maybe the guy she was with was pissed off cause she turned him down one too many times?).

The fact that another set of prints was found on the bottle with her fingerprints on it, points to a person she probably knew (dont know about you, but I dont let people I dont know drink from the same bottle that I do).

And you mention serial killer? Why are there no reports in New Haven about similar murders during the time around her death? (serial killers usually use the same patterns, or have a specific type of victim they seek out).

Personal vendetta? It could be, but you , roxdog, and killtown have yet to link anything relating to her death to 9/11 yet you all like to claim there is a connection.
 
TC329 said:
Whatever, I don't have time to play this cat and mouse game with you. I would have been better off sticking to my original statement and just ignoring you......
Click to expand...

there you go ... run away when you are presented with real facts. Run away when you are shown that you are a hypocrite.

Come on everyone repeat after me:

HYPOCRITE
 
Maybe this'll help?
619745b92ad558e54.jpg
 
Could Van de Velde sue Killclown for this?

The man's life was ruined by the allegation that he murdered Suzanne Jovin. Having some kook accusing him (and making other kooks accusing him) is the last thing that the man needs.

I really feel sorry for Van de Velde.
 
Coritani said:
Could Van de Velde sue Killclown for this?

The man's life was ruined by the allegation that he murdered Suzanne Jovin. Having some kook accusing him (and making other kooks accusing him) is the last thing that the man needs.

I really feel sorry for Van de Velde.
Click to expand...

Well, anyone can sue anyone for anything.

Would he? Probably not.

What would he win? Kilclowns 72 Pinto?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom