I casually note with no disrespect for anyone - because it is the nature of media - most media is /are not that concerned about someone being an expert regardless of implications. What they want is someone presentable, able to speak reasonablely well in public, with an intelligent appearance (unless you are a democrat/liberal being interviewed on Faux or that fat druggies show)who knows enough about a subject that they can explain it with sufficient detail that the average audience member can understand it and will keep the channel on to watch! Media lives and dies on audience - audience is not that affected by actual level of expertise/truth and frequently does not actually want to know the truth. Or, as I tell my students in media (when I teach it): No matter how things should be, how products may be, what your ethics are or are not, the purpose of a film, a show, a department, an entertainer and anyone or anything in a media company - or, really, any company is to make money for its' owners/investors. The only exception is if the owner/ investors tell you to always put out the truth regardless of the income it brings in. Do not hold your breath waiting for that to happen.
Last edited: