My experience with AE... First the group does not communicate / dialog with these so called professionals who signed their petition about technical issues. Second a fair number of them wanted a new investigation because to them the report made less than perfect sense to them... they were not CD advocates... more professionals who were not convinced by the NIST report and wanted a do-over. Third, only a core of signers did anything and did it on their own... without financial support for their *research* from AE911T. AE is a marketing operation nothing more. They raise money to stay in business of marketing. Their product is the belief that the gov lied and there was an inside job CD. Their points are something that the research which which they cite does not pass muster... and has been shown to be incorrect. They will not retreat and continue to prattle on about the same disproven false claims. People who give them a shot, not seeing the refutation... assume that they are well founded arguments.
NIST is a target because it can be spun to be a cover up of the inside job... ie NIST is in on it.. then the courts are in on it and so on.
But for years they have not produced a coherent mechanism for the 3 collapses which account for the observations... the ones they say indicate the collapses could not be unassisted and gravity driven.
If someone tries to get them to explain what happened, how it was done... they squirm and change the subject... or accuse you of being a dis info agent.
NIST is a target because it can be spun to be a cover up of the inside job... ie NIST is in on it.. then the courts are in on it and so on.
But for years they have not produced a coherent mechanism for the 3 collapses which account for the observations... the ones they say indicate the collapses could not be unassisted and gravity driven.
If someone tries to get them to explain what happened, how it was done... they squirm and change the subject... or accuse you of being a dis info agent.
