WTC7 video (new?)

[Justin39640]

I was bouncing around youtube links when i ran into this one
i cant remember seeing it linked here or running into it before

seeing its been up for over a year and it only has 3000 hits
i dont think many woo sites are linking it (for obvious reasons)

in contrast most pro woo videos have 100s of thousands of hits (in a year or two)

this video shows the west face and the east HEAVY SMOKE OBVIOUSLY COMING FROM WTC7
and heavy fire compared to the popular video that was released (and its knocking out window panes)

it also clearly shows the extent of damage north of WTC7 prior to its collapse and just how far the debris from the N tower fell

 

[alienentity]

I was bouncing around youtube links when i ran into this one
i cant remember seeing it linked here or running into it before

seeing its been up for over a year and it only has 3000 hits
i dont think many woo sites are linking it (for obvious reasons)

in contrast most pro woo videos have 100s of thousands of hits (in a year or two)

this video shows the west face and the east HEAVY SMOKE OBVIOUSLY COMING FROM WTC7
and heavy fire compared to the popular video that was released (and its knocking out window panes)

it also clearly shows the extent of damage north of WTC7 prior to its collapse and just how far the debris from the N tower fell

Thanks for sharing that. hadn't seen it.

Just a few small fires.....riiiiiiiight.

 

[T.A.M.]

I dunno the area well enough to ID that building as WTC7 but it has the same exterior and looks like WTC7...and it certainly is on fire...

TAM

 

[Brainster]

Sure looks like it; that's quite a find. Seems to be from the CBS New York affiliate.

 

[HyJinX]

If you turn your speakers all the way up and listen really, really, really hard... you still won't hear any CD explosions as the building collapses. Oh...and I didn't see any covert demolition experts sneaking in to set up hush-a-booms.

 

[alienentity]

If you turn your speakers all the way up and listen really, really, really hard... you still won't hear any CD explosions as the building collapses. Oh...and I didn't see any covert demolition experts sneaking in to set up hush-a-booms.

Yes, but the NWO already got to the original tapes and doctored the audio. Doesn't prove anything! LOL

 

[triforcharity]

That building that you see is in fact WTC 7. This is whata people refer to "small" fires. Thats a little more than a small fire. Everyone can agree on that. Now, did anyone notice the sound at :59 seconds, listen to it. That is the sound of steel beams falling, or something steel, ovbiously very large, falling.

Notice it??

 

[alienentity]

That building that you see is in fact WTC 7. This is whata people refer to "small" fires. Thats a little more than a small fire. Everyone can agree on that. Now, did anyone notice the sound at :59 seconds, listen to it. That is the sound of steel beams falling, or something steel, ovbiously very large, falling.

Notice it??

I heard it also, but I can't tell where it's coming from. Might be from somewhere other than 7.

If anyone finds out where this footage came from, it's likely that the station still has raw footage. Now THAT would be extremely useful documentary evidence.

 

[HeyLeroy]

That building that you see is in fact WTC 7. This is whata people refer to "small" fires. Thats a little more than a small fire. Everyone can agree on that. Now, did anyone notice the sound at :59 seconds, listen to it. That is the sound of steel beams falling, or something steel, ovbiously very large, falling.

Notice it??

Perfect opportunity to try out this website I found: http://www.splicd.com/

It lets you point to a particular timeframe in a youtube video.

http://splicd.com/K0CU-teE0bQ/55/65

 

[BigBird]

Excellent video! I'm very curious to know what the hell would make those cars look like that though.. They look scorched... I would expect them to be scratched and dented and have extensive damage, of course, but not to look like that.... What do you suspect was the main cause of the damage? The big beams crashing down, big debris/dust cloud rushing down the street, etc?

 

[kookbreaker]

Excellent video! I'm very curious to know what the hell would make those cars look like that though.. They look scorched... I would expect them to be scratched and dented and have extensive damage, of course, but not to look like that.... What do you suspect was the main cause of the damage? The big beams crashing down, big debris/dust cloud rushing down the street, etc?

A lot of burning debris came down. Some of it hit the cars, even if it missed some it wouldn't take much to spread given how close the vehicles are to each other.

 

[newton3376]

Excellent video! I'm very curious to know what the hell would make those cars look like that though.. They look scorched... I would expect them to be scratched and dented and have extensive damage, of course, but not to look like that.... What do you suspect was the main cause of the damage? The big beams crashing down, big debris/dust cloud rushing down the street, etc?

Maybe they looked scorched because they are......well......SCORCHED

 

[triforcharity]

Bigbird,

I can tell you from firsthand knowledge that right after the first collapse (South Tower) that there were MANY MANY cars on fire. There were other buildings on fire too, but our main concern was to get anyone and everyone OUT of lower Manhattan ASAP.

We did fight some car fires, but only around the immeadiate vacinity where we were working. When the North Tower came down, some of those cars re-ignited. Some didn't. Again, our primary concern at that time waas Search and Rescue, and evacuation. Burning cars came second.

BTW, I was near that very intersection, and most likely saaw those cars burning. But, however, I was on a rescue crew, so I didn't do much firefighting that day. Heck, I don't think I even picked up a hose untill late that afternoon, maybe even early evening.

Hope this helps.

 

[triforcharity]

Sorry, off on a tangent there. The main cause was one would ignite due to flaming debris, then it would move on to the next. Its very quick.

 

[sylvan8798]

Comment highlight: manwello15: Small fires, big fires it does not matter. Fire does not bring down buildings. There was never a building that collapsed do to fire in the history of of steel framed buildings prior to 9/11 and even after 9/11. So don't BS me and try to say fire caused the buildings to fail.
Total BS and it goes against science.

 

[triforcharity]

Sylvan,

Than WHY does NYC BC (New York City Building Codes) REQUIRE it on exposed steel in highrises??? So that they have something else to do?? So that they don't get bored??

Steel weakens at 50% of its melting point, or around 1100 degrees. Secondly, I saaw the bulge in WTC 7 on 9/11. How did it get there?? A fat girl leaning on the exterrior walls??? Come on, don't bring stupid stuff to the table.

 

[BigBird]

Comment highlight: manwello15: Small fires, big fires it does not matter. Fire does not bring down buildings. There was never a building that collapsed do to fire in the history of of steel framed buildings prior to 9/11 and even after 9/11. So don't BS me and try to say fire caused the buildings to fail.
Total BS and it goes against science.

I must have been watching the wrong channel... I could have sworn planes flew into the buildings first, didn't they?

 

[BigBird]

Bigbird,

I can tell you from firsthand knowledge that right after the first collapse (South Tower) that there were MANY MANY cars on fire. There were other buildings on fire too, but our main concern was to get anyone and everyone OUT of lower Manhattan ASAP.

We did fight some car fires, but only around the immeadiate vacinity where we were working. When the North Tower came down, some of those cars re-ignited. Some didn't. Again, our primary concern at that time waas Search and Rescue, and evacuation. Burning cars came second.

BTW, I was near that very intersection, and most likely saaw those cars burning. But, however, I was on a rescue crew, so I didn't do much firefighting that day. Heck, I don't think I even picked up a hose untill late that afternoon, maybe even early evening.

Hope this helps.

Wow thanks for your posts! They do in fact help a lot!

 

[LashL]

Comment highlight: manwello15: Small fires, big fires it does not matter. Fire does not bring down buildings. There was never a building that collapsed do to fire in the history of of steel framed buildings prior to 9/11 and even after 9/11. So don't BS me and try to say fire caused the buildings to fail.
Total BS and it goes against science.

sylvan,

Your post is neither logical nor accurate. Fire does, indeed, bring down buildings, and has been doing so since time immemorial.

Steel framed buildings are, indeed, susceptible to fire (thus the Building Code requirement for the addition of SFRM to steel framing), and most veteran firefighters will tell you that if they had a choice, they would much rather go into a burning concrete building than a burning steel-framed building. Why do you suppose that is?

 

[Justin39640]

sylvan,

Your post is neither logical nor accurate. Fire does, indeed, bring down buildings, and has been doing so since time immemorial.

Steel framed buildings are, indeed, susceptible to fire (thus the Building Code requirement for the addition of SFRM to steel framing), and most veteran firefighters will tell you that if they had a choice, they would much rather go into a burning concrete building than a burning steel-framed building. Why do you suppose that is?

i think he was quoting one of the responses on the youtube page lol
i thought the same thing for a second too
then i looked again

remember kids (like i told C7) "measure twice, cut once" lol