• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC7: The Twoofer Epiphany.

There are eyewitness accounts and audio recordings that contradict this assumption.


Not for WTC7 there isn't.



There are visible squibs moving up the side of WTC7 during it's collapse


Breaking windows...



Most of the audio recordings made near the WTC7 suffer from over modulation distortion that severely reduces their effectiveness in evaluating sound content.


Most of the audio suffers from being faked.

By the way overmodulation (one word) distortion is something that refers to telecommunications, not audio recording.

The vaguely equivelant audio recording term is "peaking". One of the problems with some WTC7 explosion recordings is they don't peak, when they should.

-Gumboot
 
Say Mirage, what about the OP?

If the NIST final report on WTC 7 confirms that there was no explosives used and that it is a collapse due to damage and fire, will you convert back to reality?
 
There are visible squibs moving up the side of WTC7 during it's collapse, obviously they must have made noise and just as obviously they should have been moving downward if they were air-pressure induced.

Why should they have been moving downward if they were air-pressure induced? WTC7 collapsed bottom-up, so the air pressure wave would have been moving upwards; limitations on internal airflow would therefore mean that the floors nearer the collapse zone would have been pressurised more rapidly than those further up, and hence windows on those floors would be expected to blow out first. Alternatively, if they were simple window breakages due to deformation of the structure, one would expect the deformation to be greater closer to the collapse zone, therefore spreading upwards. Either way, I'd say your conclusion is far from obvious, and possibly obviously wrong.

Dave
 
Gravy, thank you very much for pasting some old quotes from the archives, it must be a big job to get them back, you have enough time for that. Thank you for copy pasting some random misstakes from things I had wrong, things that were new for me when first confronted with the 'truth' movement and things that I reject now.

Truther's like to collect quotes from experts like Van Romero and other people and use them still now, you do exactly the same bad boy Gravy. Thanks again

ps. explosives built in the building ?? I never said that! I only heard that from a politician who said that to me at a Dutch board, yeah even a Jewish politician.
 
Last edited:
My point, einsteen, is that you haven't changed a bit. Prove me wrong for once and back one of your claims with evidence.
 

Back
Top Bottom