• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC Steel

And then you have the combustion of the materials and fittings in the offices that can produce temperatures in the 1000-1200 degree range..

And in the Fires on 911, large holes in the building would have allow easy ingress of air to the fire and exit of the smoke, far more so that in a conventional office fire. Indeed given the breeze (albeit light) that day (and which increases with height) the free flow of air may have added a "blast furnace" effect elevating temps well above what would be considered normal.
 
because the chance is lower someone will notice something while recycling.
less educated workers there.

Never been there? I have.....and I found their engineers quite capable. Never mind the fact that if the Chinese gov. had any idea that the truthers might be right they would have had a really close look themselves. We may be trading partners but no one could call their Gov. friendly.
 
because the chance is lower someone will notice something while recycling.
less educated workers there.

Interesting statistic:

There are more honor students in China than there are students of any kind in the United States.
 
i didnt want to say the Chineses in general are bad educated, and sure their engineers are atleast as good as ours.
but i know steel recycling companys, and no engineer there, only workers with relatively low education.

would you regocnise remainings from a CD or thermite on heavy damaged and dirty steel peaces? i dont.
 
i didnt want to say the Chineses in general are bad educated, and sure their engineers are atleast as good as ours.
but i know steel recycling companys, and no engineer there, only workers with relatively low education.

would you regocnise remainings from a CD or thermite on heavy damaged and dirty steel peaces? i dont.

Talk about "bad educated"!
 
So RedIbis doesn't answer the question, but then he comes back to make some quibbling point about education levels in China. This subforum is such a complete waste of time, I have to wonder what motivates people on either side of the 'debate', like RedIbis and T.A.M., to make thousands of posts here. The Truth Movement is going nowhere. It is full of idiots who think they're qualified to pass judgement on scientific matters they don't really understand (e.g. Kevin Barrett and David Ray Griffin). The Truth Movement's yammering obsession with 'science' and 'peer review' has been its undoing. Frank Greening is the only prominent 'Truther' I can think of who is worth paying any attention to.

RedIbis and DC, I'm sure you're nice people. But at some point you guys just have to realize that your arguments are going absolutely nowhere.
 
So RedIbis doesn't answer the question, but then he comes back to make some quibbling point about education levels in China. This subforum is such a complete waste of time, I have to wonder what motivates people on either side of the 'debate', like RedIbis and T.A.M., to make thousands of posts here. The Truth Movement is going nowhere. It is full of idiots who think they're qualified to pass judgement on scientific matters they don't really understand (e.g. Kevin Barrett and David Ray Griffin). The Truth Movement's yammering obsession with 'science' and 'peer review' has been its undoing. Frank Greening is the only prominent 'Truther' I can think of who is worth paying any attention to.

RedIbis and DC, I'm sure you're nice people. But at some point you guys just have to realize that your arguments are going absolutely nowhere.

To be fair to my ex nemesis DC, I would say he is not a truther now. I give him credit for backing away from his earlier positions. Him and G Urich are the only one's I have seen that have done so.

He has me on ignore however so maybe won't see this.
 
So RedIbis doesn't answer the question, but then he comes back to make some quibbling point about education levels in China. This subforum is such a complete waste of time, I have to wonder what motivates people on either side of the 'debate', like RedIbis and T.A.M., to make thousands of posts here. The Truth Movement is going nowhere. It is full of idiots who think they're qualified to pass judgement on scientific matters they don't really understand (e.g. Kevin Barrett and David Ray Griffin). The Truth Movement's yammering obsession with 'science' and 'peer review' has been its undoing. Frank Greening is the only prominent 'Truther' I can think of who is worth paying any attention to.

RedIbis and DC, I'm sure you're nice people. But at some point you guys just have to realize that your arguments are going absolutely nowhere.

hey i just played devils advocate :)

i gave up the religion of 9/11 CT's a while ago and am recovering slowely but steady :D
 
To be fair to my ex nemesis DC, I would say he is not a truther now. I give him credit for backing away from his earlier positions. Him and G Urich are the only one's I have seen that have done so.

He has me on ignore however so maybe won't see this.

DC, funk had this to say :)
 
RedIbis has avoided this question. Maybe another Truther will give it a shot.

If the WTC steel contained evidence for a CD, why would the conspirators allow it to be shipped on a barge to China?

Truthers never put up,but they don't shut up either.
 
hey i just played devils advocate :)

i gave up the religion of 9/11 CT's a while ago and am recovering slowely but steady :D

Sorry, I didn't realize you weren't saying you necessarily believed that explanation. I do remember a post from a long ways back where you'd said you were no longer sure about CD (not sure if that was twin towers and/or WTC7).
 

Back
Top Bottom