WTC-7 Was Taken Down Using Controlled Demolition

twinstead said:
It appears that since he has decided that it was impossible for the building to fall the way many experts say it did, it doesn't matter how 'They' managed to wire the building--they just must have been able to pull it off in secret, period.

This is such a common tactic, a kind of woo woo circuit breaker logic that makes it impossible to 'win' a debate with them, at least in their minds. To me it sits at the core of many truther's cognitive problems.

It's useless bothering with minor details like how the charges were set surreptitiously; they just were.
Click to expand...
yeah, its a 1-2 punch of logical fallacies i find very common among pseudoscience proponents (9/11 CTs, moon hoax, creation, etc)

argument from incredulity+false dichotomy, usually amounting to "it couldnt have happened your way, so it must have been my way"
 
Terreal:

All of the evidence points directly to insider terrorists taking down WTC-7 by Controlled Demolition on 9/11.
Click to expand...
The terrorsists were inside the plane.

The demoilition was controlled from the cockpits. Its an excellent name for the control room of an airplane. Cockpit

I hate when reality gets in the way of a conspiracy theory. How did the buildings get wired to explode? I don't know but they were!!!
 
Last edited:
Terral. Why are you wasting your time here bickering with these people when this ground-breaking and conclusive proof should be taken to the proper authorities?

Good God man! The NWO is slaughtering millions upon millions every second and you're posting what essentially boils down to our last chance at human freedom on an internet forum?!?!?!?

Why do you hate humanity so, Terral?

.... Why?
 
Oh yeah, and another thing...actually two more.


Why was the controlled demolition so quiet, both visually and audibly? No flashes or bangs which are predominant in any other controlled demolition I've ever seen. Thanks.


Also, why do you think the inside jobbers waited 8 hours (8 hours!!) to destroy building 7, when they knew that millions of people would likely be watching, instead of destroying WTC7 clandestinely in the significant dust cloud of the collapse of either WTC 1 or 2? The dust clears, WTC 7 is down, nobody sees it fall, there is WTC 2 debris embedded in WTC 7, the public buys the story, no problems.
 
Last edited:
Mince said:
Oh yeah, and another thing...actually two more.


Why was the controlled demolition so quiet, both visually and audibly? No flashes or bangs which are predominant in any other controlled demolition I've ever seen. Thanks.
Click to expand...

Hush-a-boom brand silent explosives!

Also, why do you think the inside jobbers waited 8 hours (8 hours!!) to destroy building 7 when they knew that millions of people would likely be watching instead of destroying WTC7 clandestinely in the significant dust cloud of the collapse of either WTC 1 or 2? The dust clears, WTC 7 is down, nobody sees it fall, there is WTC 2 debris embedded in WTC 7, the public buys the story, no problems.
Click to expand...

See, not only are the inside jobbers the most intelligent and devious enemies the USA has ever faces, but also the most inept and incompetent.

Easy!

:D
 
Terral, what is the basis of your claim that the firefighter in the picture you posted in your OP has a confused head?

What do you think he is confused about, and how do you know?

You might feel this is a minor point among your earth-shattering red-pill claims. (I don't feel that way myself. Fires and buildings don't mind if you misrepresent, belittle, and patronize them, but people do). But you did take the trouble to mention it, so you should be able to offer a rationale to support it. I'm not asking for proof, or even for strong evidence. Just your reasoning for how you came to the conclusion that the firefighter in the picture was confused. If you cannot provide any rationale for even your minor claims, why should anyone pay any attention to your major ones?

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
Mince said:
Also, why do you think the inside jobbers waited 8 hours (8 hours!!) to destroy building 7 when they knew that millions of people would likely be watching instead of destroying WTC7 clandestinely in the significant dust cloud of the collapse of either WTC 1 or 2? The dust clears, WTC 7 is down, nobody sees it fall, there is WTC 2 debris embedded in WTC 7, the public buys the story, no problems.
Click to expand...

Well, that certainly would have been the way to do it. But, like Terral says, he is CONVINCED it was a CD so all this idle speculation is irrelevant. It doesn't matter how, it doesn't matter why, it doesn't matter who else agrees or disagrees, the collapse was CD and that's all there is to the matter.

We've lost, gentlemen. All I can do now is drink more beer.
 
Christopher Bollyn's Nickname For This Picture Stuck For Me

Hi Myriad:

Myriad >> Terral, what is the basis of your claim that the firefighter in the picture you posted in your OP has a confused head? What do you think he is confused about, and how do you know?
Click to expand...


I exchanged some emails with Christopher Bollyn about this WTC case and he referred to the famous picture as the one of “The Confused Fireman.” Since then the nickname just kind of stuck for me. Anyone experienced in this field knows that massive column (over his head) was NOT cut using any cutting torch. You guys can believe anything you wish.

GL,

Terral
 
Terral said:
Hi Myriad:




I exchanged some emails with Christopher Bollyn about this WTC case and he referred to the famous picture as the one of “The Confused Fireman.” Since then the nickname just kind of stuck for me. Anyone experienced in this field knows that massive column (over his head) was NOT cut using any cutting torch. You guys can believe anything you wish.

GL,

Terral
Click to expand...
Terral:
Your in the business. Why don't you demonstrate one of these thermite cuts on a large column like that. 'Truthburn' couldn't do it. Would make a hell of a youtube video. Easy common stuff right?
 
twinstead said:
That is why it is so sad. Terral is fully aware that upon close examination most, if not all, of what he posted can be shown to be crap, yet he posts it anyway.

The old famous throw a bunch of mud against the wall and see if any of it sticks technique. Gotta love the oldies but goodies.
Click to expand...

For truthers, it will always be September 12, 2001.
 
Mincing Words And Answering Questions

Hi Mince:

Mince >> Oh yeah, and another thing...actually two more. Why was the controlled demolition so quiet, both visually and audibly? No flashes or bangs which are predominant in any other controlled demolition I've ever seen. Thanks.
Click to expand...


What makes you believe there were no explosions taking place all morning long in connection with these three Controlled Demolitions? WTC-7 is the “Smoking Gun” for many people, but perhaps Mince could not hear the explosions from his house? :0)

Mince >> Also, why do you think the inside jobbers waited 8 hours (8 hours!!) to destroy building 7, when they knew that millions of people would likely be watching, instead of destroying WTC7 clandestinely in the significant dust cloud of the collapse of either WTC 1 or 2? The dust clears, WTC 7 is down, nobody sees it fall, there is WTC 2 debris embedded in WTC 7, the public buys the story, no problems.
Click to expand...


You are asking for my opinion? Another Jetliner (like Flight 93) was supposed to hit WTC-7, but the inside-job bad guys said, “The Americans are so stupid, we will just “Pull it” and they will believe anything we tell them . . .”. Obviously their ploy worked on many of you, but not on everyone. :0)

GL,

Terral
 
Last edited:
Terral said:
...but perhaps Mince could not hear the explosions from his house?
Click to expand...


Regarding WTC7, I could not hear the explosions anywhere, at any time from any place. There is no record of pre-collapse explosions and flashes that is the earmark of any controlled demolition I've ever seen.





You are asking for my opinion?
Click to expand...


Yes. And you failed to answer the question. I'll repost it.

Why do you think the inside jobbers waited 8 hours (8 hours!!) to destroy building 7, when they knew that millions of people would likely be watching, instead of destroying WTC7 clandestinely in the significant dust cloud of the collapse of either WTC 1 or 2? The dust clears, WTC 7 is down, nobody sees it fall, there is WTC 2 debris embedded in WTC 7, the public buys the story, no problems.
 
Last edited:
realitybites said:
Terral. Why are you wasting your time here bickering with these people when this ground-breaking and conclusive proof should be taken to the proper authorities?

Good God man! The NWO is slaughtering millions upon millions every second and you're posting what essentially boils down to our last chance at human freedom on an internet forum?!?!?!?

Why do you hate humanity so, Terral?

.... Why?
Click to expand...
That's one my beefs with these guys, but honestly, I really liked the way you put so I'm going to quote it and if you don't mind, requote it in the future.

Well Terral....
 
Last edited:
Hi Terral;


There has never been a controlled demolition without flashes and bangs before or after 9/11. Yet on 9/11 there were three controlled demolitions without flashes and bangs. You can't suspend the laws of flashes and bangs.

What gives?
 
Last edited:
Terral said:
You are asking for my opinion? Another Jetliner (like Flight 93) was supposed to hit WTC-7, but the inside-job bad guys said, “The Americans are so stupid, we will just “Pull it” and they will believe anything we tell them . . .”. Obviously their ploy worked on many of you, but not on everyone. :0)
Click to expand...

Of course. A plan so bold, so diabolically clever, so brilliant in its execution that it fooled just about everybody, even experts, except a few intrepid googlevestigators.

Curses! And we would have got a way with it too, if it wasn't for you meddling kids and your dog!
 
Last edited:
DavidJames said:
That's one my beefs with these guys, but honestly, I really liked the way you put so I'm going to quote it and if you don't mind, requote it in the future.

Well Terral....
Click to expand...


And ask him why he gives money (via taxes) to a criminal government that is killing and enslaving its citizens. Terral is aiding and abetting mass murderers. Once the truther revolutionaries have overthrown the NWO, Terral will have to answer for his crimes.

What say you, Terral? Why are you funding murderers?
 
Dave Rogers said:
It doesn't state anything of the sort. It states that the Twin Tower collapses were caused by a combination of the initial damage and thermal weakening of the surviving structure. I searched all nine pages and found not one single occurrence of the word "melt".

Dave
Click to expand...

Bah, it was this link provided on Gravy's site my apologies:

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/generalscience/wtc_science_010919.html

In analyzing the disaster, most engineers and architects assume that the top floors gave way when fire melted the steel structures that support the towers
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom