BasqueArch
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2009
- Messages
- 1,871
BasqueArch, congratulations. You did great work... there's not much I would change.
I would go further here by saying that the collapse involved two mechanisms; one that led to the collapse initiation, and the other which progressed the collapse. The first was creep, which AE911truth, et al seems to forget happens to unprotected steel when it's heated under loads. This means the column begins to bend out of the vertical and the load above creates an increasing lever that accelerates the bending even further until the column either completely fails or the connecting elements fail from torsional or tensile stresses introduced by the buckling.
The other mechanism was the pancaking floors which you correctly point out pancaked downwards. As this happened all of the connections were sheared off leaving the exterior panels to either topple freely as a group or individually.
Thanks Grizzly
You're right of course about the columns creep as a sign of impending collapse.
It appears that at least in this instance most of the truss seat angles survived. Other plates, angles are missing.
After the initial collapse the loads were chaotic. Perhaps the falling debris concentrated away from the floor edges (center of floor deflected under load first before failure) , with the joist top chord forced upwards at the ends the single 5/8" per truss connecting bolt either sheared or punched through.
http://www.debunking911.com/construction.jpg
http://www.studyof911.com/gallery/albums/userpics/10002/normal_BTflyingcolumns.jpg
Last edited:





