ponderingturtle
Orthogonal Vector
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2006
- Messages
- 54,796
I was just wondering something, if Steven Hawking was an american would he have been able to be successful with all his health problems, or would be have been crushed by debt?
Good question. Given that he was a student when he was diagnosed, would he have been able to secure healthcare coverage for that diagnosis that would have supported him through that career?
Anybody in a position to speculate?
Rolfe.
how rich was his parents when he was diagnosed?
well then i think it would be possible.
but, it would still be much harder, because one thing you should never have to worry about when having a ill child or beeing ill yourself, is money, and in the UK i think this is the case, but not in the US. so for his parrents it would have been alot harder, additional to the health problem of their child they would be confronted with financial problems.
So you're saying that America is somehow exceptional. I wonder if there's a name for this kind of argument.Probably not.
I still don't think we should have UHC. Not because it's an unworthy cause or anything, but because our government is completely incapable of managing the social programs it already has.
It takes a religious level of faith in the Federal government to believe that an American UHC program would be anything other than a catastrophic failure of special interest wrangling and pork. We're not the UK, we're not Sweden, we're not Japan. Hell, we're not even Canada.
ht.
Probably not.
I still don't think we should have UHC. Not because it's an unworthy cause or anything, but because our government is completely incapable of managing the social programs it already has.
It takes a religious level of faith in the Federal government to believe that an American UHC program would be anything other than a catastrophic failure of special interest wrangling and pork. We're not the UK, we're not Sweden, we're not Japan. Hell, we're not even Canada.
Besides, the lack of UHC here has, by way of Natural Selection, produced strapping lads such as Neil deGrasse Tyson and Michio Kaku, who could totally take Hawking in a fight.
is there a lack of accauntability for your politicans maybe?Probably not.
I still don't think we should have UHC. Not because it's an unworthy cause or anything, but because our government is completely incapable of managing the social programs it already has.
It takes a religious level of faith in the Federal government to believe that an American UHC program would be anything other than a catastrophic failure of special interest wrangling and pork. We're not the UK, we're not Sweden, we're not Japan. Hell, we're not even Canada.
Besides, the lack of UHC here has, by way of Natural Selection, produced strapping lads such as Neil deGrasse Tyson and Michio Kaku, who could totally take Hawking in a fight.
Well the financial problems might not have hit his parents, he just would have had no money at any real point, so that he would qualify for medicaid. This might have undermined his desire to finish his PHD so he could get a job and get married though.
So you're saying that America is somehow exceptional. I wonder if there's a name for this kind of argument.
Why is the American goverment so uniquely incompetent? People on medicare and medicaid are generaly happy with their care and coverage.
is there a lack of accauntability for your politicans maybe?
good possible.
but i think Steven Hawkins is a great example how you actaully can have a extremly huge profit from a UHC even if you belive it is making you pay for other peoples problem.
good possible.
but i think Steven Hawkins is a great example how you actaully can have a extremly huge profit from a UHC even if you belive it is making you pay for other peoples problem.
he is an example how the whole world has profited from the British NHS.
we wouldnt have the knowledge we have today without him.
How do you even know he was treated through the NHS?