• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Would proof change your skeptical nature?

How Have Lifegazer's Efforts To Argue For Universal Godhood (See Below) Affected You?

  • I Always Believed In God As Lifegazer Describes Him

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • I Was Not Certain, But Lifegazer Has Persuaded Me To Accepting His Conclusions

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • I Am Not Yet Certain, But I Now Lean More Towards Accepting Lifegazer's Claims

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • I Am Not Yet Certain, But I Now Lean More Towards Disbelieving Lifegazer's Claims

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • I Was Not Certain, But Lifegazer Has Persuaded Me To Reject His Conclusions

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • I Always Disbelieved In A God As Lifegazer Describes Him

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • I Have Not Yet Read Enough Of Lifegazer's Own Words To Hold An Opinion On Them

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • We All Live On Planet X Where None Of This Applies Option

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    0
Jeff Wagg said:
It's funny..many people voted yes and no for the same reasons.

I think what we've "proved" here is that polls can be pretty useless.

I voted Yes for items related to case, but I had to ignore the word Paranormal to do so, because once something is "proven," it's no longer paranormal.

Take pandas and mountain gorillas for example. Not too paranormal today, but 120 years ago, they were in league with the Loch Ness Monster.
Click to expand...

I know, badly worded
Toni.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom