The Drain
Master Poster
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2005
- Messages
- 2,555
I'm not sure where to start.
I'm watching the UK general election count, with a particular interest in what is happening here in Northern Ireland.
The count in Derry/Londonderry was held up for a couple of hours by a 'suspect car' outside the count centre there.
Army bomb experts dealt with a 'viable device'. No-one hurt. No news headlines.
But...
It turns out that it was a taxi driver who had a bomb put in his car, and he was then forced to drive his car to the count centre. This is what we call a 'proxy' bomb - and it is truly horrid; worse even than a 'suicide' bomb.
Bombs in Ireland used to mean a bomb being placed, a telephone warning being made, and if the warning was clear and in time then people being able to get out of the way in time. (Not always - check out Omagh, August 1998, amongst many others, because of f***ed up warnings). Still, we were largely used to the principle of warnings.
Then the world became aware of 'suicide bombers' - with 9/11 in the USA being the prime example. (I know: Israel had experienced suicide bombings previously, as had the American and French military in Lebanon). But civilian security protocols up till 9/11 had largely worked on the basis that any potential terrorist was concerned about his/her own life.
I would suggest that a terrorist forcing an innocent person to drive a bomb to a target is worse than a suicidal terrorist driving his or her own bomb to their target... 'worse' because it's more horrifying for the general population.
Let me put it this way: You might be frightened by the possibility of a bomb exploding while you're in town, whether it's an abandoned bomb or a suicidal bomb - but consider the alternative possibility of you as an innocent bystander being told that your family will be shot if you don't drive a bomb into town with you yourself being the unwitting 'suicide' bomber.
Bloody terrorists. Why can't they leave us alone?
I'm watching the UK general election count, with a particular interest in what is happening here in Northern Ireland.
The count in Derry/Londonderry was held up for a couple of hours by a 'suspect car' outside the count centre there.
Army bomb experts dealt with a 'viable device'. No-one hurt. No news headlines.
But...
It turns out that it was a taxi driver who had a bomb put in his car, and he was then forced to drive his car to the count centre. This is what we call a 'proxy' bomb - and it is truly horrid; worse even than a 'suicide' bomb.
Bombs in Ireland used to mean a bomb being placed, a telephone warning being made, and if the warning was clear and in time then people being able to get out of the way in time. (Not always - check out Omagh, August 1998, amongst many others, because of f***ed up warnings). Still, we were largely used to the principle of warnings.
Then the world became aware of 'suicide bombers' - with 9/11 in the USA being the prime example. (I know: Israel had experienced suicide bombings previously, as had the American and French military in Lebanon). But civilian security protocols up till 9/11 had largely worked on the basis that any potential terrorist was concerned about his/her own life.
I would suggest that a terrorist forcing an innocent person to drive a bomb to a target is worse than a suicidal terrorist driving his or her own bomb to their target... 'worse' because it's more horrifying for the general population.
Let me put it this way: You might be frightened by the possibility of a bomb exploding while you're in town, whether it's an abandoned bomb or a suicidal bomb - but consider the alternative possibility of you as an innocent bystander being told that your family will be shot if you don't drive a bomb into town with you yourself being the unwitting 'suicide' bomber.
Bloody terrorists. Why can't they leave us alone?