• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

World record for a high-rise steel structure for CD is...

IIRC, there was a problem w/ the pins that held the engines in place. The engine that fell off also took out a chunk of the wing, and when the plane slowed down to land there wasn't enough lift and it crashed. The entire world's fleet of 747's was grounded and the problem corrected. What was the coverup?

(Prepare yourselves for a DU ballast woo rant)...

I can't quite remember it, and I live in that country. I think witnesses saw 'men in white' walking trough the crashsite. And it was stated that the plane carried weapons for Isreal. And some mysterious passengers that hitched along on that plane. There where also some issues regarding the uranium that was onboard the plane (tailsection I believe). Lot of BS, offcourse. But I think it filled the need of the Dutch to have their very own CT, just like the Americans have.

By the way, the first engine knocked off the second engine, rendering the plain unstearable. It could only fly in circles, which where getting tighter and lower, until a building stood in its way.

ETA: Oh, I forgot. It has the best main ingredient that any CT needs. The plane was an 3vil j000 plane!
 
Last edited:
Gravy, I've indeed made a lot of misstakes in the beginning, I'm relatively new, some CT sites and stuff you have to swallow also contains a lot of nonsense.
I wasn't criticising you for being a diamond in the rough. I was criticising you for not showing signs of improvement. You constantly argue from incredulity. Beliefs aren't evidence. Questions aren't evidence.

The pentagon could be a plane, so what.
Why don't you put that in a Christmas card and send it to Bernard Brown Sr.?

The problems I'm having with 9/11 are only the buildings that's all, nothing more nothing less
No, the problem you have is not with buildings at all. You have a problem with rationality, and you believe that the opinion of an individual who didn't study a complex problem should be valued as highly as the findings of a multitude of experts who thoroughly investigated the problem.
 
I've accepted a lot of theories by scientists that are hard to swallow for 'the man in the street', special relativity, quantum mechanics, statistical mechanics etc. But we are having a totally different situation in which the word 'truth' could be redefined. I will call it a temporary truth from now on.

Gravy, did you already take your dictionary out of the dust to check what "blow up" means ?
 
Gravy, did you already take your dictionary out of the dust to check what "blow up" means ?
Offhand, I can think of four definitions: to inflate, as a balloon; to enlarge, as a photo; to have an angry outburst; and to explode. What's this in reference to?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom