The Atheist
The Grammar Tyrant
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2006
- Messages
- 36,371
What I am about to say, I am not sure I entirely agree with, but here it goes:
Wearing such crystals could be a sign of motivation towards some of those goals.
I was reading Freakonomics, by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, a couple of weeks ago. (The revised and expanded version).
The last chapter was about names parents give to their children, and if the name really mattered in their success or not. Basically, it does not.
But, (and this is where it is relevant to the topic) some who changed their names from an awful one to a good one, tended to be more successful than those who kept a bad name. The authors theorize that it is really motivation that makes the difference. Someone motivated to change their name, is likely to be motivated in other ways, to be successful.
As for the charms: Appreciating them, while knowing full well that they do not have powers, could simply be an emblem of your motivation.
Again, I'm not sure I even fully agree with my above arguments, myself. If anyone has other comments, I'd appreciate them.
(Reading Freakonomics tends to do these crazy things to people's thoughts.)
As others pointed out: I would not pay extra for ones with "powers" vs. ones without. And, I would not support anyone or any business claiming to be in the business of selling "real magic" charms.
Oh, and one more thing:
"Unexpected Miracles" sounds like an invitation for inducing post-hoc arguments.
Well, your argument with names has been around for a long time and I agree with the premise. Johnny Cash put it pretty well in a A Boy Named Sue. Sue wasn't motivated to change his name, but it certainly toughened him up!
I can see that a kid named "Moon Unit" or "Tiger Lily" might attract quite a lot of criticism from others and the mere changing it to something more "normal" will induce different attitudes towards that person which could easily be used as a motivational tool.
Not so sure that holding on to crystals would re-create the same effect, however.