Newtons Bit
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2007
- Messages
- 10,049
I'll second that! I really resent anyone telling me how I should dress so that they can best enjoy my figure.
Way to be a team player.
I'll second that! I really resent anyone telling me how I should dress so that they can best enjoy my figure.
Not only is this guy a creep, apparently he's unaware that women can look over their shoulders in front of a full-length mirror. I'm perfectly capable of viewing myself from the rear, moron."Because women cannot see themselves from the rear, the vast majority of women are unaware that trousers are very unflattering for them"
I have a thing for men's legs. I think it is hostile behavior for them not to wear skirts, since their legs are essentially sexy, and should be seen. I hereby demand a change in men's clothing choices more in line with my personal tastes.
Trust me on this: One look at my legs would put you off sex for life.
Norm
That may be overstating this guy's importance. "A major donor to UKIP" does not equate to "a public figure", and I've certainly never heard of him.
Mike
Empress: no, I'm not shaving my legs for you.
So let me get this straight, this guy's annoyed that women don't dress so he can ogle them?Or so says one Demetri Marchessini in his book Women in Trousers: A Rear View (published in 2003 but it seems that only recently has anyone actually read a copy). He also said it was "hostile behaviour" for women to wear trousers rather than skirts and that "women’s legs are essentially sexy"...
Has this person ever even looked at a pair of women's trousers?"Trousers are made for men’s bodies, which are mostly straight up and down. Women’s bodies on the other hand consists of curves..."
"Women’s legs are essentially sexy"
This guy actually sounds like a budding stalker-type rapist. I watch too many crime shows but the way he sees women's clothing choices and an affront to him is not sane, IMHO.
Well he's nearly eighty so probably not much of a risk. I'm waiting for comparisons with Saville et al to be drawn.Yeah, this guy is a serious creep.
Yeah, that struck me as rather stupid. Mirrors aren't exactly a new idea.Not only is this guy a creep, apparently he's unaware that women can look over their shoulders in front of a full-length mirror. I'm perfectly capable of viewing myself from the rear, moron.![]()
So it seems.So let me get this straight, this guy's annoyed that women don't dress so he can ogle them?
Pun intended?What an ass.
On Tennis:But the most shocking action that Clinton committed took place on his very last day in office, when he pardoned Marc Rich, the well-known fugitive. Now, Clinton was not related to Marc Rich — he was not his brother, nor his cousin. Indeed, he had never even met him. Why, therefore, would he pardon a well-known fugitive? It is perfectly obvious that Rich must have given him an enormous bribe. And yet this possibility has never been raised in America. American naïvety is amazing, and Clinton relied on it. He knew that he would get away with it.
On African slavery:The rules of Tennis clearly state that “play shall be continuous”. Each time that a player stops play to contest a ruling, therefore, he is not only being discourteous and unsportsmanlike, but he is also breaking the rules of Tennis. The leading culprit was McEnroe. Not surprisingly, players very rarely stop to argue about a line call when they are winning — it seems to happen only when they are losing, and when their opponent is going well. Inevitably, the interruption disrupts their opponent’s rhythm and concentration, while giving themselves a chance to re-group. That is quite clearly cheating, and yet it is allowed to continue. Is that “tennis” ?
He expounds further in the book on why university students are a threat to society, why Joe McCarthy was an under-appreciated American hero and more.Another of the most hypocritical issues in today’s world is the guilt about the slavery practised in the New World by the colonial powers. Americans are wringing their hands in remorse at this terrible thing. As usual, the Americans only see their own history. The fact is that slavery has existed since the beginning of time, all over the world. There was nothing new about it. The colonial powers did not invent it. More to the point, people refuse to admit that the blacks had anything to do with it. When the English and the French landed in West Africa, they did not run around with lassoes, trying to catch blacks. They bought slaves from BLACK slave dealers. Indeed, the slave trade was the mainstay of the black kingdoms of West Africa, and was what they lived on. There had always been an enormous amount of slavery throughout all of Black Africa. At one time, three-quarters of Black Africans were slaves.
Nor did slaves in Africa have a very good future. Their average life expectancy was only about six months. The voyage to America was horrible, but those who survived it had a considerably longer life expectancy. The most amusing event was that, after first England, and then France, had abolished slavery, and slave trading had fallen drastically, a delegation from West Africa came to the European capitals, to protest that their income had been cut, and to request that their abolition of slavery be reversed.
and denies the link between HIV and AIDSOne of the amazing phenomena in today’s world is the belief, by a large portion of the population, that “global warming” is caused by man. There is not the slightest evidence for this belief, and yet not only do many people believe it implicitly, but they castigate and criticise as “fools” those who do not accept it. What is the evidence for this assertion?
with a level of ignorance about virii and epidemiology that's staggering.Now, it was, and is, perfectly clear that HIV could not possibly be the cause of AIDS. HIV is a virus, and viruses spread like wildfire, like colds.