TFian
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2010
- Messages
- 1,226
Oops, you just put yourself in the "burdensome and unfit" category.
Bye.
Respectfully,
Myriad
Hey..can't I make babies?
Oops, you just put yourself in the "burdensome and unfit" category.
Bye.
Respectfully,
Myriad
why would they want to propagate a genetic line of burdensome and unfit people?
Why not just euthanize you and not waste the time and resources carrying an unfit baby to term?
Not rubbish
State fines conspiracy writer in harassment case
http://www.mailtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090925/NEWS/909250330
Delmart "Mike" Vreeland -- a primary source for Ruppert's conspiracy theory screed Crossing the Rubicon -- has been sentenced to 336 years in prison for pedophilia
http://www.kdvr.com/kdvr-douglascomangets336years-7716585,0,1532614.story
The case against Ruppert is extemely dubious. It certainly doesn't support your claim that he is "a known sexual harasser":
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/to_a_hammer_everything_is_a_nail.shtml
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/to_a_hammer_everything_is_a_nail_part_ii.shtml
How does that support your ridiculous claim that he has "been known to consort with pedophiles"? [my bold]
"If you actually READ the two chapters in question you will find them very cold indeed about Mr. Vreeland, and remarkably focused instead on the sole question of a particular document's authenticity or lack thereof." Jamey Hecht, Crossing the Rubicon's editor.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=4748650#post4748650
So what, you like Mike Ruppert? Even I think the guy is a fruitcake lol. Also don't use his website to try to defend him against legal accusations, he's obviously biased. I don't really care if he's a sexual harasser and pedophile (though I wouldn't be surprised), I do think he's pretty funny though.
Buy a big plot of land, some animals, get rid of all your clothing (can't have any of those pesky man-made materials), electronics, your house (gotta build a new one by hand!), get rid of your electricity, your running water (wells or streams only!). That should be a good start.
Lots of stuff to do, get moving!
If you all die, or all live, makes no difference to me.
TFian, defending himself against accusations of sociopathy:
That settled, let's return to a question of far greater relevance to TFian's way of life:
Yes, the Internet will survive energy contraction.
Hmm, I don't think so.
Global energy consumption of the internet is estimated at 3-5%, but growing very rapidly.
http://www.energysavingtrust.org.uk...owing-report-finds/(energysavingtrust)/697758
http://www.fastcompany.com/1601894/greenpeace-cloud-computing-greenhouse-gas-emissions-to-triple
Huh? The internet is supposed to consume (according to your second link) about 2 trillion kWh -- call it six quadrillion BTU -- in 2020. World energy production today is about 500 quadrillion BTU.
How do you get 3-5% out of these numbers? My math says that even with no growth in energy production, that's still in the 1% range. Most policy wonks suggest 1-2% production growth a year for the next decade.
Well it was in my first link, though it seems to be down at the moment. I'll see if I can find a copy.
I agree with Grand Archdruid John Michael Greer on this,
"Grand Archdruid" is John Michael Greer's legitimate title. Should you doubt that, I refer you to the official biographies provided by the Ancient Order of Druids in America.Why. Why. Why. Why. Why do you keep referring to this man as "Grand Archdruid"? Are you part of some cult?
"Grand Archdruid" is John Michael Greer's legitimate title. Should you doubt that, I refer you to the official biographies provided by the Ancient Order of Druids in America.