Why the Continued Interest in Bigfoot on This Forum

[makaya325]

http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/226389466

http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/28924

 

[EHocking]

http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/226389466

...Chaining Oregon: Surveying the Public Lands of the Pacific Northwest, 1851-1855

HOW, is this a useful cite for supporting your claim that,

I know for a fact that Wildlife Groups/conservationists spend day in and day out, scanning a specific area for a specific species, and having a pretty high success rate.

???

http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/28924

And this is a 1995 publication that is, "designed to help resource managers detect the presence of lynx, wolverines, fishers, and martens by using standardized, non-lethal methods."

You claim to know FOR A FACT that there is a "pretty high success rate" finding specific species, I was expecting you to provide a cite for that "fact", not Googlefart an irrelevant book on a 19th century terrestrial surveying effort and a 4 year old paper on suggested non-lethal methods of detecting animals.

Where is YOUR cite for your statement, "I know for a fact that Wildlife Groups/conservationists spend day in and day out, scanning a specific area for a specific species, and having a pretty high success rate."?

Or is this yet another invented assertion?

 

[makaya325]

Where is YOUR cite for your statement, "I know for a fact that Wildlife Groups/conservationists spend day in and day out, scanning a specific area for a specific species, and having a pretty high success rate."?

Where is the proof? Look, it is not an extraordinary claim. Do you not see organizations which spend months, covering dozens of square miles, searching for something such as a wolverine?

 

[William Parcher]

Dogswitcher Fan Club

Newsletter #0000000001

Breaking News.....

BFF Member "bipedalist" Visits Dogswitcher

A lucky Bigfooter got to meet Dogswitcher. They went out to the woods looking around for Bigfoot.

The more I try to understand the more I realize that I don't know..I told my friend the bipeadalist the other day we were out in the woods trying to set up some equipment, in a real spookey place, I said my friend what if we find out we are the sasquatches..He said he really did not want to go there, there is some strange reason we all love the forest..Ever wake up real tried and can't figure out why??

I will vouch that I have seen Mr. Burnette's receipt for a shipment from a Pack N Post in Marion, NC for the date that he said on about he was going to be mailing the skull off to Canada after receiving it back from Texas (it was Fri. July 3rd dated as I remember)...

Hopefully, with some scouting and time spent on the property late summer/early Fall I can personally appreciate more about what may be happening out there.

Awesome! There was no mention of any dogs being switched during the visit. Maybe bipedalist will keep track of his dogs over time to look for switch changes.

We hope that you enjoyed our premiere newsletter. We are always looking for guest contributors. This is a labor of love for Dogswitcher and the search for answers to the mysteries of the baboon-faced Bigfoot baby and so much more.

William Parcher (Founder)

 

[EHocking]

Where is the proof?

You must have some - otherwise you would not have stated that, ""I know for a fact that ..."

Look, it is not an extraordinary claim. Do you not see organizations which spend months, covering dozens of square miles, searching for something such as a wolverine?

I was asking you for the FACTS that you claim to know, or is this merely yet another of your baseless assertions along the lines of, "All NA animals have been found."?

 

[makaya325]

I was asking you for the FACTS that you claim to know,

Since it is not an extraordinary claim, I do not have to provide links. Do not expect links for every minor claim. There is a difference between claiming bigfoot is real, and wildlife organizations and national park staff scanning certain areas.

 

[EHocking]

Since it is not an extraordinary claim, I do not have to provide links. Do not expect links for every minor claim.

Yet another of your KNOWN FACTS, they eh?

There is a difference between claiming bigfoot is real, and wildlife organizations and national park staff scanning certain areas.

And a difference between saying studies are peformed looking to monitor species and stating that it is a FACT that these are performed daily with a high level of success.

In other words, yet again, you are unable to support yet another of your assertions or inaccurate generalisms.

 

[makaya325]

And a difference between saying studies are peformed looking to monitor species and stating that it is a FACT that these are performed daily with a high level of success.

Of course they are. Why do you think the government would not have hired individuals who specialize in this business?

 

[EHocking]

Of course they are.

Cite?

Why do you think the government would not have hired individuals who specialize in this business?

Now I need to go out and find a gif of someone moving goalposts.

That's not the point and you know it. The point YOU KNOW as FACT is that all these studies, ongoing daily, have a high degree of success.

Please show us these FACTS. It should be relatively simple since you said yourself that yours is a trivial assertion.

 

[makaya325]

That's not the point and you know it. The point YOU KNOW as FACT is that all these studies, ongoing daily, have a high degree of success.

Yes, in finding already known species, not new ones

 

[EHocking]

Yes, in finding already known species, not new ones

If this is a KNOWN FACT, please provide evidence, rather than your continued ill-informed opinions.

That's all I have asked - back up your assertion of this FACT with, er, FACTS.

 

[makaya325]

If this is a KNOWN FACT, please provide evidence, rather than your continued ill-informed opinions.

http://www.nwf.org/wildlife/

All of your questions will be found on there. There is no need to demonstrate that wildlife biologists have a good success rate of finding REAL animals, due to the fact that we know they exist.

http://www.clr.pdx.edu/projects/volunteer/mystery.php

http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/insects/catnw/index.htm

Here is evidence that people actually go look for certain species.

 

[SweatyYeti]

It's things like this...

....that make these threads all worthwhile...

 

[Jungle Jim]

Aaagh! What have you people done to my thread? Nevermind. Will the last one to leave please turn off the lights.

 

[SweatyYeti]

BTW.....this guy...

...is available for public use, for a price...

Just inquire.

 

[Akhenaten]

BTW.....this guy...

...is available for public use, for a price...

Just inquire.

o rly?

 

[snoop_doxie]

Dogswitcher Fan Club Newsletter

Dogswitcher Fan Club

Newsletter #0000000001

Breaking News.....

BFF Member "bipedalist" Visits Dogswitcher

A lucky Bigfooter got to meet Dogswitcher. They went out to the woods looking around for Bigfoot.





Awesome! There was no mention of any dogs being switched during the visit. Maybe bipedalist will keep track of his dogs over time to look for switch changes.

We hope that you enjoyed our premiere newsletter. We are always looking for guest contributors. This is a labor of love for Dogswitcher and the search for answers to the mysteries of the baboon-faced Bigfoot baby and so much more.

William Parcher (Founder)

Thank you William Parcher for the Premier Newsletter!
Very informative and quite succinct.
I look forward to many more newsletters. This update made my day!

Questions:
Does one need more than one dog for it to switch?
Will Dogswitcher be sharing any DNA results from the BFBB? (Baboon-faced Bigfoot Baby?)
Where can I read more about the Dogswitcher? He seems to ask the hard questions: "Ever wake up real tried and can't figure out why?? "
He is a mystery.

 

[snoop_doxie]

o rly?

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/209954a744fbe8ff9a.gif[/qimg] [qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/209954a744fbe8ff9a.gif[/qimg] [qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/209954a744fbe8ff9a.gif[/qimg] [qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/209954a744fbe8ff9a.gif[/qimg] [qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/209954a744fbe8ff9a.gif[/qimg] [qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/209954a744fbe8ff9a.gif[/qimg] [qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/209954a744fbe8ff9a.gif[/qimg]

Oh, I was gonna ask how you got the changing smiley, the the quote function showed me.
DUH.

 

[EHocking]

http://www.nwf.org/wildlife/

All of your questions will be found on there. There is no need to demonstrate that wildlife biologists have a good success rate of finding REAL animals, due to the fact that we know they exist.

In other words you cannot support your assertion. Thanks - I'm going leave this "conversation" now. You've worn me down with your interminable ignorance. I am not surprised that other posters have accused you of trolling.

http://www.clr.pdx.edu/projects/volunteer/mystery.php

http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/insects/catnw/index.htm

Here is evidence that people actually go look for certain species.

Your current avatar is so apt considering your efforts in this last exchange.

 

[makaya325]

In other words you cannot support your assertion. Thanks - I'm going leave this "conversation" now. You've worn me down with your interminable ignorance. I am not surprised that other posters have accused you of trolling.Your current avatar is so apt considering your efforts in this last exchange.

Thanks for not looking at my links.