• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Why is homosexuality wrong?

He was a great opponent to have, really. He made it so easy. He'd set them up and we all could knock them down.

He had a plane to catch... a layover... a bathroom stall to visit... you know-- the stuff those Christian non-homosexuals do every once in awhile to renew their energy so they can spew their hatred anew (if he flies through Colorado, he can get a relaxing massage and some invigorating meth, I hear....)
 
And mouth is for eating, hands are for working, breasts are for milking, and you pee with....wait a second. You're no fun at all!

we women have our own pee orifice separate from the recreation area and the zone of intense pleasure. We don't go for that all in one organ thing you've got going. And we keep our gonads tucked safely inside as well.
 
First of all can you guys see the simple logic, or is it too much for you?

:):):)

Well part of the problem is that the penis is also used for urination. Another is that lesbians generally don't have anal sex.
 
First of all can you guys see the simple logic, or is it too much for you?

:):):)

It's too much for me... succumbing to the impeccable logic now...



must judge others harshly,

must threaten others with hellfire,

must follow what I've been taught no matter how cruel and meanspirited,

must put three smilies after saying something really nasty,

must try to model perfect Christian behavior by judging others,

must pretend to be holier than everyone else,

must obey

must obey

must obey...

logic of 'arse is for pooping' too powerful to argue with.


You will all go to hell! And your souls will rot for eternity!
:):):)
 
Considering that neither of your posts displayed intelligence, you certainly do not have to worry about "mincing it up." Although "simple" still applies.


My statements stated a fact:
I think you want to confuse fact with fiction.
 
I think I'm right in asserting that nearly all human body parts have a 'biologically functional purpose' (they're simply my choice of words - I don't seek to infer any specific biological, scientific, medical, anatomical or whatever meaning). Some parts seem to serve a clearly definable single purpose, such as the eye, or ear; others serve dual or multiple purposes, such as the nose or penis.

As a race we have, for whatever reason, discovered or 'acquired' dual or multiple purposes for certain parts of the anatomy over and above the biologically functional purpose. To my mind, the penis, vagina and anus, for example, have obvious biologically functional purposes, and it seems obvious to me that one such function of the vagina is to accommodate the penis during copulation. I do not, however, see the anus in the same way. As an orifice to accommodate the penis for sexual pleasure, just like the mouth, seems like a secondary, 'man-made' purpose.

Does that make anal sex or felatio wrong, whether it be heterosexual or homosexual? I don't think so. I do, however, consider it wrong to try to suggest that the anus or mouth, for example, have equivalent validity to the vagina when seeking to 'defend' homosexual acts.
 
Last edited:
Just like some very old folks used to say "If god wanted men to fly he would have given us wings"...

All homosexuals engage or like anal sex? So, as long they do not, they will go to Heaven, eh?

And what about heterosexuals who engage anal sex? Hellbound?
 
It's so obvious!!!
Arse is for defecation not for sex:
If you can't see that then you need your brain examined.


Your first claim was that homosexuality was wrong. Next you referred to the use of the human rear end to pass fecal matter. That's quite a leap. Your reasoning is as compelling as that of Mel Gibson, so, not at all.

Does not everyone have a rear end, gay, straight or bisexual? If you feed a heterosexual, does she not poop?

Let us establish three facts:

1) Straight people can have anal sex or sex that is not anal sex
2) Gay people can have anal sex or sex that is not anal sex.
3) Bisexuals can have anal sex or sex that is not anal sex

Thus if "arse is for pooping" proves that homosexuality is wrong, does it not also prove that heterosexuality and bisexuality are wrong?

So you admit that you are wrong, I gather. Wrong in the sense that as you are probably at least one of gay, straight, or bisexual; therefore you are wrong because arse is for pooping.

What if a heterosexual has had major surgery and has to wear a colostomy bag. Now they could have heterosexual arse sex while their arse was no longer used for pooping. Would they receive a special dispensation for being straight while anally sexy and colostomized?

Could a colostomy bag-wearing Ho Mo Sexual have gay queer anal sex while their arse was not for pooping and still escape the wrath of your logic?

I just want to get the details straight before we start documenting these new rules that everyone will be required to honor and obey, what with the rules being so logical.
 

Back
Top Bottom