• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Why is homosexuality wrong?

God relieved society of that task in the New Testament.

I thought God was immutable ?

What i'm saying is that homosexuality remains a sin. Homosexuality is condemned in no uncertain terms throughout the New Testament. They are worthy of death as is any unrepentant sinner.

Ignorance. I so HATE ignorance.

God is an idiot.

Now being a transvestite is still a sin and just because its socially acceptable nowadays for women to dress up like men (personally I think it's gross and un-ladylike) doesn't make it right or acceptable in the eyes of God.

It's a good thing that I don't care about what's acceptable to him.

Society calls a lot of things that are evil nowadays good, this is an example of that and God warned us this very thing would happen in the end times that we now face ourselves in.

And yet you people have been saying that for 2000 years and we're still kicking.

How long is that second coming supposed to take, anyway ?

Ah! Yes, I seem to remember now. During the lifetime of the apostles. I guess we've missed something, here. :rolleyes:

God did not create any human being as a homosexual. They are not born that way, just as murderers are not born that way. Homosexuality is a chosen lifestyle, a rebellion against the Almighty. God created Adam and Eve NOT Adam and Steve!

Actually, homosexuality seems pretty much genetic. So how are they NOT born that way ?
 
Ah! Yes, I seem to remember now. During the lifetime of the apostles. I guess we've missed something, here. :rolleyes:
Actually Bartholomew and Andrew are both still alive in the Congo where they ride their Tyrannosaurs against each other in playful jousts.

Loser catches that night.
 
Not only do I frequently indulge in sex for recreational as opposed to procreational purposes, I am of mixed race. Now if I could only find some other women to jump into a shower with, I would be Xenon II's worst nightmare.

Heh heh heh.
If you provided evidence of the shower romp, you might be the hero of many of this board's horny denizens.

Heck of a way to make a 12,000th post: a salicious reference. Oh, yeah, it's me, and the caffeine is at high tide.

DR
 
You know there are other things we (yep, this really is a gay man typing) can do, right? And you can get AIDS from straight missionary position. See the AIDS stats for southern Africa.
AIDS only transmutes through the anus. Especially when you wear a condom.

On inter-racial sex, the 'morality' of it in my eyes has to do with genetics. Generally, the more genetic diversity the better. So I'd be better of having kids with an Asian or African than with another white person. Bible be damned.

That's certainly true for in the beginning, however he obviously did create the other races later otherwise they wouldn't exist today.
Oh, so that's how it is. First He created us superior human beings, meant to rule the Earth and be fruitful, and then as an afterthought He created them lowly brown animals so we'd have someone to oppress:rolleyes:.

Does that pic date from the 1960's and are those people Christians? That pic was probably taken well before any "civil rights" movement and those people are certainly not Christians. Christians do not believe in the genocide of groups of people, but liberals do. Liberals holocaust the unborn in their thousands day in day out.
Puh-leeze. Who is for free condoms distributed to whoever asks for them, so that unwanted pregnancies go down? Liberals are. Who is for comprehensive sex education, so that we learn of our bodies and safe sex and don't have unwanted pregnancies? Liberals are. Who is for gay adoption, which is in part an attempt to get more parents for the kids in orphanages? Liberals are.

Who scream as loudly as they can about sex ed and condoms being evil, thus increasing the number of unwanted pregnancies and as such abortions? Who try to make abortion illegal and thus far more unsafe, and then proceed to have abortions anyway? You guys.

It gets severely on my nerves when fundies complain about abortions. My parents gives 1000 Norwegian crowns a year to the Norwegian Red Cross, which with its condom distribution and sex ed programs does more to reduce abortions than your juvenile abortion clinic picketing in the rain ever will.

Spare me.

Society calls a lot of things that are evil nowadays good, this is an example of that and God warned us this very thing would happen in the end times that we now face ourselves in.
Didn't Jesus say He would return within the lifetime of His disciples? Who died 2000 years ago?

If I go on a date and my girl is an hour late, and all attempts to contact her by cell phone or other means have failed, I'm long gone. And here you see fundies wait for a guy who's 2000 years overdue. You can say what you want about fundies, but they sure are a patient breed:).
 
Last edited:
Can we revisit the no-kitten rule? Sure threads like this one indicate that there is a pressing need to allow kittens and recipes.
 
The thing that makes me laugh the most at people like Xenon is that they will never have significant power. I mean, face it: Not even the most extreme conservative would even begin to suggest in public that we should go back to supporting segregation... at least, not if he wants a career in politics.

People like Xenon are only good at laughing at, just like Fred Phelps. In fact, we should make that "love wagon" (was that what it was called?) that people rolled in front of Phelps, and roll it in front of Xenon.

Xenon, I just have one suggestion. The JREF is not for you -- you won't convince nor convert anyone here. Instead, why don't you go to Storm Front? You'll probably find many like-minded individuals.

And then hey, you may even end up hanging a negro or two while in white pillowcase masks. Fun times, fun times.

Why should I go to Stormfront? Isn't there room for me here? Is this a "Liberals ONLY!" Forum? I didn't see no sign proclaiming such when I signed up! As far as I'm concerned I bring some much needed diversity to the discussions here. :D

Talking about diversity which liberals claim they support even to the extent they accept bizarre and perverted sexual fetishes like homosexuality as normal, offensively raising them up to the same level as heterosexuality (the two are NOT equivalent, one creates life the other perverts it!) they seem to be against it when it comes to a diversity of opinion or maintaining racial diversity. Funny that.

I am not a racist, but unlike many Conservatives today I am not scared of blacks and I am not an apologist for them. Conservatives will claim blacks are socially conservative, which must be why over 90% of them vote democrat and why they make up less than 13% of the population but blacks are responsible for 37% of all of the abortions each year. Blacks practically keep the abortion mills running, it's disgusting.

Conservatives whine on about beleiving that people should be held personally responsible for their behavior but they don't apply that to blacks. What are blacks not people now? How racist! When a black screws up who do they blame? They blame WHITE liberals! Why? Because its socially acceptable to attack liberals and white people but it isn't to "attack" blacks, even liberal blacks. Many Conservatives today are cowards, just like those phoney Christians in the 1960's who re-interpretated their Bibles, gave them a liberal makeover, just to pander to a tiny minority that launched a unholy war against God's Word.

The Conservative attitude to blacks, blaming others for their bad behavior, is very condescending to blacks, it's saying the black community can't think for themselves. It's giving blacks a free ride, saying they aren't responsible for their own actions, it's always "whiteys" fault! Well I believe holding the blacks accountable for their own behavior. I'm not scared to be branded a "racist" or other such nonsense because I know I am not!

I don't want to bring back segregation or make the Negro sit at the back of the bus (geez can you think of anything more petty for a group to whine about?!) however I don't believe interracial "marriage" is right. I believe it is an abomination that goes against the word of God and is unnatural. It brings together what God has created seperate. A white man in an interracial relationship was not created that way, both his parents were white.

I would settle for a constitutional amendment defining marriage as a union of one man and one woman of the same race and so-called Christians get back to sound Biblical teaching that race mixing is a sin. That's as far as we need to go for the 21st century, perhaps a ban on non-white immigration is in order as well. America was founded as a white Christian nation and has become multi-racial more than enough already.

We also need an Israeli style security fence for the southern American border to keep out the criminal Mexicans who have no respect for a nation's sovereignty or the rule of law, and who are swarming into the USA like there's no tomorrow! Illegals should be shown zero tolerance as these parasites murder several American citizens every day. They bring crime and disease and before long the USA will degenerate into a 3rd world hell hole if things are allowed to continue. RINO Bush the phoney Christian who blabbers on about all religions believing in the same God (AS IF!, what blasphemous offensive nonsense!) has been particularly useless in this area, even tag teaming up with Senator Ted Kennedy to introduce an outrageous pro-amnesty bill, but then what's new. If Bush is a Conservative then I'm a dutch man and I'm not a dutch man.
 
Last edited:
I am not a racist, but....<snip> Blacks practically keep the abortion mills running, it's disgusting...<snip> a tiny minority that launched a unholy war against God's Word.<snip> I'm not scared to be branded a "racist" or other such nonsense because I know I am not!...<snip> perhaps a ban on non-white immigration is in order as well. America was founded as a white Christian nation and has become multi-racial more than enough already.

If you're not a racist, the word has no meaning at all. Another word will have to be found for what you are. Unfortunately, rule 8 prevents me from suggesting some.

You still haven't answered my question: Was Martin Luther King a Christian?
 
Originally Posted by XenonII View Post
I am not a racist, but....<snip> Blacks practically keep the abortion mills running, it's disgusting...<snip> a tiny minority that launched a unholy war against God's Word.<snip> I'm not scared to be branded a "racist" or other such nonsense because I know I am not!...<snip> perhaps a ban on non-white immigration is in order as well. America was founded as a white Christian nation and has become multi-racial more than enough already.

It is the eugenic supporters that keep the mills open. They think they are culling the population of undesirables.
 
Why should I go to Stormfront? Isn't there room for me here? Is this a "Liberals ONLY!" Forum? I didn't see no sign proclaiming such when I signed up! ... I don't believe interracial "marriage" is right. I believe it is an abomination that goes against the word of God and is unnatural. It brings together what God has created seperate. A white man in an interracial relationship was not created that way, both his parents were white.
...I would settle for a constitutional amendment defining marriage as a union of one man and one woman of the same race and so-called Christians get back to sound Biblical teaching that race mixing is a sin. That's as far as we need to go for the 21st century, perhaps a ban on non-white immigration is in order as well. America was founded as a white Christian nation and has become multi-racial more than enough already.
Right on, Bunky, you sure didn't see no sign that said that. And that interracial marriage stuff, I forget where God said that was an abomination in the Bible. I lent my Gideon out to my half-sister, and can't recall the chapter and verse. Could you help a feller out and look that up for me?
 
If you're not a racist, the word has no meaning at all. Another word will have to be found for what you are. Unfortunately, rule 8 prevents me from suggesting some.

You still haven't answered my question: Was Martin Luther King a Christian?

correction: rule ten
 
It brings together what God has created seperate. A white man in an interracial relationship was not created that way, both his parents were white.
And how long is that supposed to be taken?

A rich man in a relationship with a poor girl was not created that way, both his parents were rich.
A Norwegian man in a relationship with an Icelandic girl was not created that way, both his parents were Norwegian.
A blonde man in a relationship with a brown-haired girl was not created that way, both his parents were blonde.
A city boy in a relationship with a country girl was not created that way, both his parents were city people.
A Houstonian man in a relationship with a Galvestonian was not created that way, both his parents were Houstonians.

And so on.

I'm not scared to be branded a "racist" or other such nonsense because I know I am not!
Most racists and bigots
'know' they're not either.

And that interracial marriage stuff, I forget where God said that was an abomination in the Bible.
As far as I recall, it doesn't. Which is why they have to shoehorn phrases like that you shouldn't have two different animals pull the same carriage.

[...] perhaps a ban on non-white immigration is in order as well. America was founded as a white Christian nation and has become multi-racial more than enough already.
America was originally populated by Native Americans, buddy. Did God supposedly create us white people in North America? Don't think so.

Saying that only whites should be allowed in the USA since it's 'the whites' land' is like saying only Asians should be allowed to immigrate to Europe, 'since it's their continent and all'. It simply makes no sense whatsoever.
 
Last edited:
If you're not a racist, the word has no meaning at all. Another word will have to be found for what you are. Unfortunately, rule 8 prevents me from suggesting some.

You still haven't answered my question: Was Martin Luther King a Christian?

I wonder if he's as "not gay" as he is "not a racist".
 
Homosexuality is anal sex. It's what they do. They put a round peg in a square hole. It just isn't natural and it spreads AIDS. You can't not talk about homosexuality and avoid the subject it is one and the same.

A) Only gay men have anal sex?
B) Homosexual women aren't gay?
C) 'Normal' sex does not spread AIDS?
 
Why is it that liberals claim to support diversity UNLESS its racial diversity? If God only wanted one race he would have only created one race. If everyone mixes there will be only one race something which God certainly did not intend for mankind. Mainstream Christianity may have abandoned God's word on this matter by re-interpretating the Bible to pander to blacks and support a liberal view but this flies in the face of any sound hermeneutical principles as well as 1900 years of Christian theology.

It is odd that no one ever interpreted the Bible to be pro de-segregation or race mixing until suddenly there was a great amount of pressure put on certain people by "civil rights" lobbyists and advocates. It is always more than a little suspicious when ones theology changes along with the winds of political correctness.

Does that pic date from the 1960's and are those people Christians? That pic was probably taken well before any "civil rights" movement and those people are certainly not Christians. Christians do not believe in the genocide of groups of people, but liberals do. Liberals holocaust the unborn in their thousands day in day out.

Fail. Become an hero.
 

Back
Top Bottom