• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Why fake the SoC path?

DGM said:
When did he say that? Not in any interview I've seen.
Click to expand...

Well, then you haven't read Reheat's paper (you know- the one you've been mindlessly praising for months now).

reheat.jpg


Why do you ignore Morin's claim that the plane flew over the Navy Annex (aka FOB)?
 
Last edited:
So Ranquis, how does the plane flying right over Morin and parallel to the outer portion edge of the FOB fit in with your fantasy?
 
He also calls Roseborough a "possible flyover witness". Why? I have no idea.

Roseborough - I got out into the parking lot, just walking along, and all of a sudden, I hear what I would describe as a 'lion's roar' above my head.

It caught my attention, and as I looked up, I heard another roar and I saw this airplane flying low. I thought, 'Oh, my God, this thing is really low.'

I thought it was going to crash onto the highway, just as I thought that, I saw a fireball come from over the Pentagon. I was just standing there dumbfounded, thinking, 'What just happened?'
Click to expand...

It'd be more persuasive to rip a page out of the American Free Press's playbook and just make up an interview and publish it on your website, rather than tell everyone "what he really meant to say." Some people don't care where the "source" comes from (American Free Press, Prisonplanet, truthism.com), as long as they have something on the computer screen to reinforce their twisted beliefs.
 
Last edited:
dtugg said:
So Ranquis, how does the plane flying right over Morin and parallel to the outer portion edge of the FOB fit in with your fantasy?
Click to expand...


Good question. The FOB is at least 7 stories high (i was unable to find exact measurements with a quick search) with over 1 million square feet of office space. This is one big building.

Morin stepped out and watched the plane fly over him...and saw it fly directly toward the Pentagon. He goes into great detail explaining what he witnessed. There is no way he would be able to see the plane going directly toward the Pentagon using a NOC route.
 
dtugg said:
So Ranquis, how does the plane flying right over Morin and parallel to the outer portion edge of the FOB fit in with your fantasy?
Click to expand...

Especially when he was outside in the parking lot (Columbia Pike side) and saw the flash from the pole area unobstructed. So why do you ignore that he says it went over his head and parallel to the FOB TLB?
 
Mr.Herbert said:
Good question. The FOB is at least 7 stories high (i was unable to find exact measurements with a quick search) with over 1 million square feet of office space. This is one big building.

Morin stepped out and watched the plane fly over him...and saw it fly directly toward the Pentagon. He goes into great detail explaining what he witnessed. There is no way he wo uld be able to see the plane going directly toward the Pentagon using a NOC route.
Click to expand...

Actually, it is only 4 on Morin's side. Here is a pic I took in '97 of his POV area.



The gate house he was talking about is about halfway down. Taken on Columbia Pike near State Police Area HQ.
 
Thank you sir!

I stand corrected

EDIT:

That was Morins POV? I have to be missing something.
 
Last edited:
911files and Reheat,

Please answer my question:

Why do you ignore Morin's claim that the plane flew over the Navy Annex (aka FOB)?
 
Mr.Herbert said:
Thank you sir!

I stand corrected

EDIT:

That was Morins POV? I have to be missing something.
Click to expand...

Sorry, his POV was near the gate house, not where the camera was set up. I would have gotten closer, but a fsew minutes after this I found myself in the back of a DPS car for taking pictures :)

TLB...I did!
 
TheLoneBedouin said:
...
Why do you ignore Morin's claim that the plane flew over the Navy Annex (aka FOB)?
Click to expand...

The aircraft was essentially right over the top of me and the outer portion of the FOB (flight path parallel the outer edge of the FOB).
Click to expand...
Morin said 77 was south of the Annex. Sorry, lookup parallel, you will not find anyone at p4t or CIT who understand parallel.

You realize you debunk yourself every time you post?

If you understood over, parallel and how to understand what people say. You would not be posting p4t junk ideas.

Morin statement has not changed, thus CIT can’t figure out 9/11, and this make p4t math and flight path complete stupid even when it is a non-path, and a no theory issue due to Balsamo no clue non-theories stand of woo.
 
Last edited:
TheLoneBedouin said:
Why do you ignore Morin's claim that the plane flew over the Navy Annex (aka FOB)?
Click to expand...


Why do YOU ignore the fact that Morin does not have X-ray vision?

Why do you ignore the real meaning of parallel?

Oh, wait. Show this picture to Alpo and Ranke... Ask them if these lines are parallel.

cocaine_lines_on_a_mirror.jpg
 
TheLoneBedouin said:
911files and Reheat,

Please answer my question:

Why do you ignore Morin's claim that the plane flew over the Navy Annex (aka FOB)?
Click to expand...

Why do you want to ignore Morin's claim the it flew parallel to the outer edge of the FOB?

You want to place Morin between the wings of the FOB (without verification) with the plane between him and the outer edge of the FOB then we can discuss his original statements. However, that does not explain how the cartoon can place the plane NORTH of where he said it was in either intervew...
 
911files or TLB-
this might be a dumb question but is there any way to acquire radar data from an E4B. supposedly these things are state of the art command centers. one would think they would have their own radar system. anyway, i was reading a link someone posted and saw this:

http://www.the911mysteryplane.com/index.php

While my book was in press I received an email from a staff member of the 9/11 Commission. The staffer, whose name must remain confidential for the present, was involved in the radar analysis for the official 9/11 investigation. He had formerly worked at the Pentagon. The staffer acknowledged that he knew about VENUS 77 (and also SWORD 31, a second E-4B that departed from Andrews AFB at 9:26 AM) but did not investigate either of these command and control flights because he was told by his supervisor, Daniel Marcus, that the US Air Force had already briefed the commissioners about these departures.

that E4B would have been in the air before the pentagon hit. i guess im asking is do E4B's have a radar system and could the data be acquired like 911files acquired his radar data??
 
Last edited:
An E-4B doesn't have an installed air search radar. Notice the lack of giant frisbee on top. It's an airborne C2 platform that has data fed to it from other sources. Try again.
 
Reheat said:
Why do you want to ignore Morin's claim the it flew parallel to the outer edge of the FOB?
Click to expand...
You're the one who was supposed to model all witness statements at face value. CIT realize witnesses are not FDR's (especially when you're in between wings and saw the plane for a fraction of a second).

You want to place Morin between the wings of the FOB (without verification) with the plane between him and the outer edge of the FOB then we can discuss his original statements. However, that does not explain how the cartoon can place the plane NORTH of where he said it was in either intervew...
Click to expand...
You can verify it yourself easily (go talk to Morin).

Morin was in between wings, exactly where PFT shows the flyover.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom