• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Why fake the SoC path?

jhunter1163 said:
The onus is now on CIT. The fly in your ointment, as I see it, is Morin (well, that and the fact that most of your witnesses say the plane hit the Pentagon). At the very, very least, you need to produce the recording where he recants his prior statements and says he was in between the wings of the Navy Annex. You need to justify placing him in there. If you can do that, then maybe someone could work out at least a possible path.
Click to expand...
Why do you ignore Morin's claim that the plane flew over the Navy Annex?
 
Bell said:
Allthough I really appreciate how you peeps are all handling the truthers, I don't like it how all these NoC related threads turn into threads about the impossibilities of the NoC theory.

All I want from PfT/CIT is an answer to
Why fake the SoC path?

Come on, TheLoneBedouin and Roundhead, answer the question allready!
And don't give me the BS that you don't know, because you have everything else figured out allready.
Click to expand...

I guess the answer is that they flew on a different path than was faked so any witnesses could write the "flyover jet" off as the "second jet" described by "deceptive media reports." They had to have the fake path and the "flyover jet" be on such different paths otherwise the cover story for the "flyover jet" reported by "deceptive media reports" wouldn't work, and covering up the flyover was of supreme importance.

I know this makes no sense whatsoever, which is why I don't have to kill myself. Of course, nothing that Craig says makes any sense.
 
DGM said:
When did he say that? Not in any interview I've seen.
Click to expand...

I think it is supposedly in one that Ranquis refuses to release for some reason. We should just trust them because they are such honest people.
 
TheLoneBedouin said:
Answered way back in post 15. Let's not play "if-I-keep-asking-the-same-question-you-haven't-answered-it" please.
Click to expand...

You mean this post 15?

So the planners obviously wanted complete control of the damage to their own building and clearly this would be achieved most efficiently with pre-planted explosives. This is the obvious reason why they would "fake" the damage. The plane was a psychological tool and while most believed it hit the building, others were quite deliberately fooled into thinking it was a "2nd plane". Roosevelt Roberts Jr. is a prime example.
Click to expand...

Sorry, but you fail.

According to you/PfT/CIT, ALL the wittnesses saw AA77 (or whatever plane it was you thought up) fly NoC.

If so, why fake the SoC path and damage?
Why not keep with the alleged NoC path?
 
dtugg said:
I think it is supposedly in one that Ranquis refuses to release for some reason. We should just trust them because they are such honest people.
Click to expand...
Ah ha, I see. Until I hear it from the man himself I'll go with his original report. PFT/CIT needs to toss him under the bus or produce this interview.
 
TheLoneBedouin said:
Why do you ignore Morin's claim that the plane flew over the Navy Annex?
Click to expand...
Wowzer
Over means, over, like higher than. I noticed you have no idea what happen on 9/11 and glom to the idiot ideas of CIT. You know over. The sky is over us. You and CIT, and p4t have the dumbest ideas on 9/11. Why?

Terry Morin has fooled p4t and CIT and used the math/geometry term parallel. Math makes CIT and p4t dissolve into stupid statements of woo.

Terry Morin 9/01 - Former USMC aviator outside the Navy Annex “(flight path parallel the outer edge of the FOB).”

Morin means 77 was south of the Annex. You need help with this, go get it.
 
TheLoneBedouin said:
Not necessarily. PFT does not speculate on what happened to the passengers of flight 77.
Click to expand...
Do you always talk about yourself in the third person? Does PFT answer for you, or did you turn control of your mind over to them?

You see, this is one of the plane-sized holes in your little nursery rhyme. You don't speculate on it, because you cannot explain it away. The plane went somewhere. The people went somewhere. The fact you cannot come up with an explaination as to where shows just how ridiculous this whole thing is. If you cannot show absolute proof of what happened to them, you're just "speculating" (making stupid stuff up) on the entire rest of this nonsense. Until you dig up evidence that shows some alternate explaination (the plane in a hangar, the people somewhere else, something) no one should listen to anything else you say. To do so is to do things out-of-order. Prove what else DID happen to the plane and passengers first. Then we'll listen. Otherwise, the rest is hand-waving nonsense.

So get busy. Find the plane, Scooby. Until then, there's nothing else you should say or do.
 
TheLoneBedouin said:
You don't know the extant of the explosion/smoke. Besides, the key point is that the explosion was a huge distraction.
Click to expand...

Please have the courtesy of addressing my question #207 and then explain to all us of your reasoning for believing that a flyover jet would also be a "huge distraction."

From exactly what do you think hundreds of eyewitnesses would think a "flyover jet" would be distracting them? The explosion?

I think you can understand why your claims make no rational sense, TLB. First, you have an "explosion" to supposedly distract a certain number of witnesses to think a "flyover" plane actually hit the Pentagon. So, what was to distract the potential hundreds of eyewitnesses from a much wider geographical area from the "flyover" aircraft?

Please detail your reasoning.
 
TheLoneBedouin said:
Have you not read Reheat's paper? Morin says there was an "FOB flyover".
Click to expand...

Morin said:
Within seconds the plane cleared the 8th Wing of BMDO and was heading directly towards the Pentagon.
Click to expand...

HEADING DIRECTLY..... not off to the north, "directly towards."

Sorry Lonesome Arab, you lose again. Your ship has sprung a leak, all you have is Captain Bob to help you with his "Water - letter - outer. "

drill.jpg
 
TheLoneBedouin said:
Have you not read Reheat's paper? Morin says there was an "FOB flyover".
Click to expand...

Ok, pipsqueak, In an earlier thread you agreed that the aircraft was between Morin's "revised" position and the outer edge of the FOB. WHERE is that position included in any of the "flight paths" so eloquently demonstrated in the latest cartoon from the FRAUDULENT wankers?

Please challenge me or someone else to find it and your fantasy is over. I dare you to challenge me to find that post.

You lose......



 
Here's Morin's original statement again:
Quote:
“The Attack

I had just reached the elevator in the 5th Wing of BMDO/Federal Office Building (FOB) #2 – call it approximately 9:36 AM. I was already trying to make some sense out of the World Trade Tower attacks having heard about them on the radio. The news was sketchy, but the fact that it was a terrorist attack was already known. I then realized that I was wearing sunglasses and needed to go back to Lot 3 to retrieve my clear lenses. Since it was by no means a short walk to my car, I was upset with myself for being so distracted. Approximately 10 steps out from between Wings 4 and 5, I was making a gentle right turn towards the security check-in building just above Wing 4 when I became aware of something unusual. I can’t remember exactly what I was thinking about at that moment, but I started to hear an increasingly loud rumbling behind me and to my left. As I turned to my left, I immediately realized the noise was bouncing off the 4-story structure that was Wing 5. One to two seconds later the airliner came into my field of view. By that time the noise was absolutely deafening. I instantly had a very bad feeling about this but things were happening very quickly. The aircraft was essentially right over the top of me and the outer portion of the FOB (flight path parallel the outer edge of the FOB). Everything was shaking and vibrating, including the ground. I estimate that the aircraft was no more than 100 feet above me (30 to 50 feet above the FOB) in a slight nose down attitude. The plane had a silver body with red and blue stripes down the fuselage. I believed at the time that it belonged to American Airlines, but I couldn’t be sure. It looked like a 737 and I so reported to authorities.

Within seconds the plane cleared the 8th Wing of BMDO and was heading directly towards the Pentagon. Engines were at a steady high-pitched whine, indicating to me that the throttles were steady and full. I estimated the aircraft speed at between 350 and 400 knots. The flight path appeared to be deliberate, smooth, and controlled. As the aircraft approached the Pentagon, I saw a minor flash (later found out that the aircraft had sheared off a portion of a highway light pole down on Hwy 110). As the aircraft flew ever lower I started to lose sight of the actual airframe as a row of trees to the Northeast of the FOB blocked my view. I could now only see the tail of the aircraft. I believe I saw the tail dip slightly to the right indicating a minor turn in that direction. The tail was barely visible when I saw the flash and subsequent fireball rise approximately 200 feet above the Pentagon. There was a large explosion noise and the low frequency sound echo that comes with this type of sound. Associated with that was the increase in air pressure, momentarily, like a small gust of wind. For those formerly in the military, it sounded like a 2000lb bomb going off roughly ½ mile in front of you. At once there was a huge cloud of black smoke that rose several hundred feet up. Elapsed time from hearing the initial noise to when I saw the impact flash was between 12 and 15 seconds.
Click to expand...

Bolding mine. TLB, you may fire with Morin's recanting interview when you are ready.
 
If I could have some help here with finding a post by "TLB" (aka Ranquis) it would put this crap to bed.

It is a post from a few months ago by him in reply to me that Morin's secret "new" interview placed the aircraft between his position and the outer edge of the FOB, but not South of Columbia Pike.

It occurred shortly after he appeared here, so it should not be that difficult to find. I probably don't know how to exploit the search function here as I've not been very successful in finding relevant posts in the past.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom