Caustic Logic
Illuminator
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2007
- Messages
- 4,494
No, he says that he didn't see them (5:45). Therefore, when he says they were to the north later at 7:45, it must have been deduced after the fact.
That's what I get starting at 6:00. So there he sez
"i didn't see it hit 'em. but obviously it did, cause (inaudible, cross-fade)"
Not here he doesn't say that. I mean see them after, in context, where they actually were. In the PentaCon, at 1:05:25 "cause it broke 'em knocked down (?)." He's 100% vague on how he knows this for a fact.
Methinks he saw them knocked down, by the wings, in reality world at least.
Good eye.You're speculating.
Against reality."I know for a fact" could mean that he saw pictures of the downed light poles later. He says he "knows for a fact" that the lightpoles to the north were knocked down because "it had to be on the North Side- I don't have eyes in the back of my head" (6:40). He deduced the position of the cab and lightpoles
That you are joined at the base of the brain with Ranke Lyte Brite, yes.- its painfully obvious, Larson.
What he told Eastmen was simply inaccurate, because, as he said on site in the video "you can't really see the light poles from here" (5:45).
That's why he says he didn't see them get hit, that's the context. In fact he'd have a great view of them, if at the north row of pumps. If he were facing the right way. Then he wouldn't have been a liar when talking to ol' Dick.
And either way, Would you deny that he probably saw the poles, and Lloyd's cab, where they actually were after? That's my point here - his memory of the scene had to be totally shifted from the distinctive overpass at the cloverleaf, to a different flatter spot. That's another unlikely memory error, IMO.
Last edited: