Why did they "pull" tower seven?

[Bell]

Just think of all those helicopters haging in the sky with cameras rolling all ready to catch the plane screaming down in a powerdive and huge explosion into the roof of WTC7 ? The wall-to-wall coverage day and night would have been spendidly enhanced just as the 'shock and awe' effect would be considerably reinforced.

If the plane had arrived 40 minutes late the chances were that they might have encountered some fighters. I believe the plane was under remote control anyway and if it HAD been shot down, explaining an empty plane with state-of-the-art remote technology woulld have been kind of uncomfortable.

 

[excaza]

One would think 'power diving' into the White House would be the ultimate shock and awe, not some building nobody outside of NYC had ever heard of.

 

[sheeplesnshills]

This is I guess what I should have been asking all along. I am willing to accept that the tower was demolished and I should have made this clear in my original post."

Why? There is not evidence that it was. None.

"I also accept that the had to do to hide evidence of the failed plane attack. I didn't realize this when I first posted so I asked the wrong question."

What failed attack? No plane was heading for the WTC7

Knowing what I now know, I will ask again a different way:

What possible conspiracy theory (or grand strategic plan) can you think of in which it would make sense to have WTC7 as a target?

None, it was an insignificant (well relatively) building in a world of bigger better targets. Its destruction makes no sense other than as collateral damage.

 

[The Charnel Expanse]

I'm gonna stick with my poltergeist theory.

 

[Scott Jurgenson]

Uh... Flight 93 took off from New Jersey and made it across all of Pennsylvania before it was hijacked. Wouldn't it have made more sense to hijack another plane coming out of Boston-Logan if their intention was to hit WTC7 and the attack was time-sensitive?

No that makes too much sense to fit into his **** tard conspiracy.

 

[Scott Jurgenson]

Why can't CT's just stop and consider that maybe...just MAYBE...building 7 was not a smoking gun or significant at all. Maybe it just came down becuase a sky skraper fell on top of it and fires weakened it. Why can't they just accept that it is a possibility?

 

[excaza]

Why can't CT's just stop and consider that maybe...just MAYBE...building 7 was not a smoking gun or significant at all. Maybe it just came down becuase a sky skraper fell on top of it and fires weakened it. Why can't they just accept that it is a possibility?

Because they think Occam is a new camera from Nikon.

 

[Sabretooth]

Why can't CT's just stop and consider that maybe...just MAYBE...building 7 was not a smoking gun or significant at all. Maybe it just came down becuase a sky skraper fell on top of it and fires weakened it. Why can't they just accept that it is a possibility?

They would have to enter reality first.

If they accept one, they would be expected to accept the next. And we all know they are far too stubborn and idiotic to admit they were wrong.

 

[The Charnel Expanse]

Here's United 93's flight path
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UA93_path.svg
In what universe does that lead it anywhere close to Lower Manhattan?

 

[sheeplesnshills]

9/11 was designed to 'shock and awe'

No argument there

the American people into a trance-like state in which they would go along with any kind of government excess.

Yes perhaps Osama hoped the the US gov would overreact. They did.

It worked perfectly as you are all aware.

I don't see that they got away with "any kind of excess"

But in order to set up the conditions for the 'shock and awe' mechanic the stage had to be set- quite literally in lots of ways.

Why, four plane loads of terrorists seem to have managed just fine without setting any stages......

In this case the'stage' was New York on 9/11 and the attractions on the stage were WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7.

Nobody had heard of WTC7 prior to 911, it makes no sense as a target when you have The Empire State building, The Chrysler building, the Statue of Liberty, three major airports with lines of planes full of passengers on the ground, Times square etc etc

T

he plan was for WTC1 to be struck by the first plane. Then a 20-minute gap while people all over America called each other and televisions were switched on in their millions in nice time to catch the second plane with the impressive Hollywood-spectacular style fireball. At this point hndreds of millions of people are watching spellbound and terrified....and then the last plane comes screaming out of the sky in a high-speed powerdive and ploughs straight into the roof of WTC7.

where your evidence for that......and why the pentagon?, was that another plane that was supposed to hit WTC6 and got lost????

If you thought the WTC2 fireball was spectacular you cannot imagine what the WTC7 one was designed to look like.

Why would it look any different? you don't think two of the tallest buildings in the world collapsing was impressive enough??????...........

But of course the best laid plans and all that.....Flight 93 got held up on the runway for 40 minutes by a fire making it too late to carry on with it's mission of hitting WTC7. So the perps sent it out over rural Pennsylvania while they worked out what to do.

sent it out? how?

Then they lit those unlikely looking fires in WTC7 after the collapse of the North Tower hoping they would develop into a general inferno allowing them to demolish the building under that cover. Unfortunately the fires did not really take and with the lowering of the light they had to go ahead and demolish the building anyway at 5:20.

and the NYFD just stood back and watched them do that????? What unlikely looking fires? The NYFD said there were big uncontrolled fires and the building was failing.......and we are supposed to believe you with your zero evidence, over them? I think not.

OK Bill thanks for showing us you are as insane as Jammo.

 

[excaza]

Here's United 93's flight path
[qimg]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UA93_path.svg[/qimg]
In what universe does that lead it anywhere close to Lower Manhattan?

Scenic route.

 

[bill smith]

So just to be clear then, there is no particular reason in your view why it was building 7 as opposed to anywhere else? In other words they just needed a third building within view of the first two and it could have been any nearby building?



How would shooting down the plane wind up leaving more suspicious evidence than if the plane just crashes in a field? I am assuming they crashed that plane in the field on purpose if it was remote controlled. It would seem to me that being shot out of the sky would be an even better means of destroying any evidence than just crashing in a field.

Yes. I think WTC7 was to be the crescendo. It was just in the right location to be on the stage for the positioned cameras to capture it's attack by 'pure chance'.

I don't believe that flight 93 was crashed in Shanksville at all actually. But that's a spin-off story.

 

[Bell]

Here's United 93's flight path
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UA93_path.svg
In what universe does that lead it anywhere close to Lower Manhattan?

Does that map compensate for the rotation of the Earth? Huh?

 

[The Charnel Expanse]

Yes. I think WTC7 was to be the crescendo. It was just in the right location to be on the stage for the positioned cameras to capture it's attack by 'pure chance'.

Crescendo? LOL
Do you even know what that word means?

 

[sheeplesnshills]

If the plane had arrived 40 minutes late the chances were that they might have encountered some fighters. I believe the plane was under remote control anyway and if it HAD been shot down, explaining an empty plane with state-of-the-art remote technology would have been kind of uncomfortable.

Yet not so when it crashes in PA??????

 

[Scott Jurgenson]

I don't believe that flight 93 was crashed in Shanksville at all actually. But that's a spin-off story.

So what about all the remains of people that were there? Were they dropped out of the sky by a C-130 or something?

 

[sheeplesnshills]

I don't believe that flight 93 was crashed in Shanksville at all actually. But that's a spin-off story.

LOL Not an easy thing to fake It was clever of them to make it look exactly like it should have looked like instead of what truthers imagine it would have with strewn bodies and big bits of plane.

 

[bill smith]

So what about all the remains of people that were there? Were they dropped out of the sky by a C-130 or something?

.

You should remember that all information that comes through the government about 9/11 is highly suspect and unreliable.

 

[sheeplesnshills]

Scenic route.

I blame their Tom Tom, the chose cycle routes by mistake.

 

[excaza]

Yes. I think WTC7 was to be the crescendo. It was just in the right location to be on the stage for the positioned cameras to capture it's attack by 'pure chance'.

I don't believe that flight 93 was crashed in Shanksville at all actually. But that's a spin-off story.

Crescendo doesn't mean what you think it does.

How on Earth is crashing an airplane into a building nobody's heard of more shocking than crashing it into something like the Chrysler Building, the Empire State Building, or the freaking White House? Not to mention your "giant fireball bigger than the WTC1/2 fireball" theory doesn't really hold water because anyone with a functioning brain cell knows that those giant explosions only happen in movies.