Why did they "pull" tower seven?

[Sabretooth]

At the appropriate juncture Sabretooth all will be made clear.

Somehow, I really doubt it.

 

[Horatius]

In due course my dear Horatius....in due course

Hey, I'm just making another prediction about your actions and results. So far I'm doing pretty well on that score.


But hey, do feel free to come back here and post an "I told you so!" if you ever do get off your ass and prove my prediction wrong.


I won't be holding my breath, of course.

 

[tsig]

At the appropriate juncture Sabretooth all will be made clear.

Bill, you're starting to sound like a Magic 8 Ball.


http://www.thefind.com/family/info-magic-8-ball

 

[JLord]

At the appropriate juncture Sabretooth all will be made clear.

What are you talking about? Do you have some information that you are not revealing, or are you predicting some future revelation from another source?

In either case I am still interested in knowing if you are able to come up with any possible theories as to why a conspiracy would target WTC7. You have probably been the most helpful poster in this thread so far in terms of providing information so that is why I am asking you specifically.

(although I'm still interested in anyone else's theories as well)

 

[tsig]

Hey, I'm just making another prediction about your actions and results. So far I'm doing pretty well on that score.


But hey, do feel free to come back here and post an "I told you so!" if you ever do get off your ass and prove my prediction wrong.


I won't be holding my breath, of course.

Try this link:

http://8ball.tridelphia.net/

You'll get better answers

 

[bill smith]

This is I guess what I should have been asking all along. I am willing to accept that the tower was demolished and I should have made this clear in my original post.

I also accept that the had to do to hide evidence of the failed plane attack. I didn't realize this when I first posted so I asked the wrong question.

Knowing what I now know, I will ask again a different way:

What possible conspiracy theory (or grand strategic plan) can you think of in which it would make sense to have WTC7 as a target?

9/11 was designed to 'shock and awe' the American people into a trance-like state in which they would go along with any kind of government excess.

It worked perfectly as you are all aware.

But in order to set up the conditions for the 'shock and awe' mechanic the stage had to be set- quite literally in lots of ways.

In this case the'stage' was New York on 9/11 and the attractions on the stage were WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7.

The plan was for WTC1 to be struck by the first plane. Then a 20-minute gap while people all over America called each other and televisions were switched on in their millions in nice time to catch the second plane with the impressive Hollywood-spectacular style fireball. At this point hndreds of millions of people are watching spellbound and terrified....and then the last plane comes screaming out of the sky in a high-speed powerdive and ploughs straight into the roof of WTC7.

If you thought the WTC2 fireball was spectacular you cannot imagine what the WTC7 one was designed to look like.

But of course the best laid plans and all that.....Flight 93 got held up on the runway for 40 minutes by a fire making it too late to carry on with it's mission of hitting WTC7. So the perps sent it out over rural Pennsylvania while they worked out what to do.

Then they lit those unlikely looking fires in WTC7 after the collapse of the North Tower hoping they would develop into a general inferno allowing them to demolish the building under that cover. Unfortunately the fires did not really take and with the lowering of the light they had to go ahead and demolish the building anyway at 5:20.

 

[aggle-rithm]

Bill, you're starting to sound like a Magic 8 Ball.


http://www.thefind.com/family/info-magic-8-ball

Hee! They need to come out with a special truther edition that says things like, "I don't know, that's why we need a new investigation", and "I don't have a theory", and "google '9/11', you'll find all the answers there!"

 

[DGM]

Then they lit those unlikely looking fires in WTC7 after the collapse of the North Tower hoping they would develop into a general inferno allowing them to demolish the building under that cover. Unfortunately the fires did not really take and with the lowering of the light they had to go ahead and demolish the building anyway at 5:20.

It must be fun working from "whole cloth" with no need to consider reality.

 

[beachnut]

9/11 was designed to 'shock and awe' the American people into a trance-like state in which they would go along with any kind of government excess.

It worked perfectly as you are all aware.

...

WTC 7 was on fire, it fell; that is what buildings do in fire. You were lied to by 911 truth and you have zero capability to resist the idiotic delusions they have, so you spread them. It is called failure and ignorance.

You are exactly what you say others are; gullible. You are the one who is in a trance state spewing lies and posting idiotic nonsense. This post the proof.

 

[JLord]

But in order to set up the conditions for the 'shock and awe' mechanic the stage had to be set- quite literally in lots of ways.

In this case the'stage' was New York on 9/11 and the attractions on the stage were WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7.

That is a fine explanation of what happened, but I am still unclear as to why building seven was targetted or how this would fit into the conspiracy. Are you saying that they just needed another building to crash into and make a spectacular explosion and it didn't really matter what building and they just randomly decided on building seven?

Flight 93 got held up on the runway for 40 minutes by a fire making it too late to carry on with it's mission of hitting WTC7.

What happened within the 40 minutes that made it too late to carry out the mission? After 40 minutes there would surely be a lot of cameras on scene. Or is that exactly what they were trying to avoid, having too many cameras around?

 

[Sabretooth]

9/11 was designed to 'shock and awe' the American people into a trance-like state in which they would go along with any kind of government excess.

It worked perfectly as you are all aware.

But in order to set up the conditions for the 'shock and awe' mechanic the stage had to be set- quite literally in lots of ways.

In this case the'stage' was New York on 9/11 and the attractions on the stage were WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7.

The plan was for WTC1 to be struck by the first plane. Then a 20-minute gap while people all over America called each other and televisions were switched on in their millions in nice time to catch the second plane with the impressive Hollywood-spectacular style fireball. At this point hndreds of millions of people are watching spellbound and terrified....and then the last plane comes screaming out of the sky in a high-speed powerdive and ploughs straight into the roof of WTC7.

If you thought the WTC2 fireball was spectacular you cannot imagine what the WTC7 one was designed to look like.

But of course the best laid plans and all that.....Flight 93 got held up on the runway for 40 minutes by a fire making it too late to carry on with it's mission of hitting WTC7. So the perps sent it out over rural Pennsylvania while they worked out what to do.

Then they lit those unlikely looking fires in WTC7 after the collapse of the North Tower hoping they would develop into a general inferno allowing them to demolish the building under that cover. Unfortunately the fires did not really take and with the lowering of the light they had to go ahead and demolish the building anyway at 5:20.

That is the most fantastical, baseless, fact less, and dim-witted load of ◊◊◊◊◊◊* craziness I have ever seen…

Does a whole post qualify for the stundies?

 

[excaza]

What a wild story. And again, if they're were going for "shock & awe" why wouldn't they go for the Chrysler or Empire State Buildings? That would definitely piss off a lot more people than WTC7. There was absolutely nothing significant or symbolic about WTC7.

Nice try though.

 

[Sabretooth]

What a wild story. And again, if they're were going for "shock & awe" why wouldn't they go for the Chrysler or Empire State Buildings?

Naw. Too obvious. They were going for "subtle shock & awe".

 

[bill smith]

That is a fine explanation of what happened, but I am still unclear as to why building seven was targetted or how this would fit into the conspiracy. Are you saying that they just needed another building to crash into and make a spectacular explosion and it didn't really matter what building and they just randomly decided on building seven?



What happened within the 40 minutes that made it too late to carry out the mission? After 40 minutes there would surely be a lot of cameras on scene. Or is that exactly what they were trying to avoid, having too many cameras around?

Just think of all those helicopters hanging in the sky with cameras rolling all ready to catch the plane screaming down in a powerdive and huge explosion into the roof of WTC7 ? The wall-to-wall coverage day and night would have been splendidly enhanced just as the 'shock and awe' effect would be considerably reinforced.

If the plane had arrived 40 minutes late the chances were that they might have encountered some fighters. I believe the plane was under remote control anyway and if it HAD been shot down, explaining an empty plane with state-of-the-art remote technology would have been kind of uncomfortable.

 

[HawksFan]

Yeah, Bill, why WTC7? Why not the Empire State or Chrysler buildings?

Screaming power dive? Really? That's the best you've got?

I'd never even heard of 7 until 9/12.

 

[Disbelief]

If the plane had arrived 40 minutes late the chances were that they might have encountered some fighters. I believe the plane was under remote control anyway and if it HAD been shot down, explaining an empty plane with state-of-the-art remote technology woulld have been kind of uncomfortable.

Why would they have shot down a remote controlled empty plane?

Wait, you already think that the plane was shot down over Shanksville. What's the location difference mean?

 

[The Charnel Expanse]

Uh... Flight 93 took off from New Jersey and made it across all of Pennsylvania before it was hijacked. Wouldn't it have made more sense to hijack another plane coming out of Boston-Logan if their intention was to hit WTC7 and the attack was time-sensitive?

 

[excaza]

If the plane had arrived 40 minutes late the chances were that they might have encountered some fighters. I believe the plane was under remote control anyway and if it HAD been shot down, explaining an empty plane with state-of-the-art remote technology woulld have been kind of uncomfortable.

The plane crashed into a field. No remote controls were found. It was not empty. It was also heading towards DC, not NYC.

 

[JLord]

Just think of all those helicopters haging in the sky with cameras rolling all ready to catch the plane screaming down in a powerdive and huge explosion into the roof of WTC7 ? The wall-to-wall coverage day and night would have been spendidly enhanced just as the 'shock and awe' effect would be considerably reinforced.

So just to be clear then, there is no particular reason in your view why it was building 7 as opposed to anywhere else? In other words they just needed a third building within view of the first two and it could have been any nearby building?

If the plane had arrived 40 minutes late the chances were that they might have encountered some fighters. I believe the plane was under remote control anyway and if it HAD been shot down, explaining an empty plane with state-of-the-art remote technology woulld have been kind of uncomfortable

How would shooting down the plane wind up leaving more suspicious evidence than if the plane just crashes in a field? I am assuming they crashed that plane in the field on purpose if it was remote controlled. It would seem to me that being shot out of the sky would be an even better means of destroying any evidence than just crashing in a field.

 

[Horatius]

Well well, looks like we finally got some sort of a straight answer from bill. Of course, like all such straight answers from truthers, it's still full of holes.

In this case the'stage' was New York on 9/11 and the attractions on the stage were WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7.

The plan was for WTC1 to be struck by the first plane. Then a 20-minute gap while people all over America called each other and televisions were switched on in their millions in nice time to catch the second plane with the impressive Hollywood-spectacular style fireball. At this point hndreds of millions of people are watching spellbound and terrified....and then the last plane comes screaming out of the sky in a high-speed powerdive and ploughs straight into the roof of WTC7.

So the best you can come up with is "Even more Shock&Awe"? Exactly how was WTC 7 supposed to produce more shock and awe than the earlier crash into the second tower, which was broadcast live by pretty much every news service in the world?

If you thought the WTC2 fireball was spectacular you cannot imagine what the WTC7 one was designed to look like.

Oh, I see, you answer the above with baseless speculation.

So, if the prepared "fireball" for WTC 7 was so much more spectacular, how is it it collapsed in such an unassuming manner? It's safe to say its eventual fire and collapse was one of the least dramatic events of that day. Did they unplug the fireworks? While the building was on fire? And Unoccupied?

Oh, and if the third plane was intended to hit WTC 7 just so we could see yet another crash on live TV, why was the fourth plane crashed into the Pentagon? Did they just skip the drama for that one?

Also note, that had flight 93 hit the Capitol or Whitehouse, as most people believe was intended, we still would have gotten the Live TV Shock&AWE! that bill claims they wanted from, oh, what building was that again? Oh, right, the one no one had ever heard of.

But of course the best laid plans and all that.....Flight 93 got held up on the runway for 40 minutes by a fire making it too late to carry on with it's mission of hitting WTC7. So the perps sent it out over rural Pennsylvania while they worked out what to do.

Because of course there's no point in crashing it into WTC 7 after the Twin Towers collapsed, right? By that point, no one was pointing any TV cameras at the WTC complex. Another plane coming screaming in at that point would have had no useful result, so we might as well ditch it, blow up the building anyway, and make it look all suspicious-like.

Then they lit those unlikely looking fires in WTC7 after the collapse of the North Tower hoping they would develop into a general inferno allowing them to demolish the building under that cover. Unfortunately the fires did not really take and with the lowering of the light they had to go ahead and demolish the building anyway at 5:20.

And of course they decided all this, and got the men in place to accomplish it, in the time between 8:42 and 10:03.