Why a one-way Crush down is not possible

Status
Not open for further replies.
tfk said:
Again, you did not answer ANY of the questions that I asked you.

I did not ask where WTC7 failed.
I did not ask about the free fall of the upper stories.
I did not ask whether NIST agrees with anything.
I did not ask if WTC7 was a CD.

Please go back to my post http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4907298#post4907298 and answer the questions that I ask.

Thank you.

tk
Click to expand...

You ask:

AA. Do you claim that the collapse of WTC7 was impossible?

BB. Just to be clear, is "bigger" by weight?

CC. Does this mean that you believe that, if the failure in the WTC7 tower occurred on the 24th (out of 47) floor, then the failure would have arrested. But that if it occurred on the 23rd, the failure progresses to the ground?

DD. And similarly, for the 56th vs. 54th floor of the Towers?

AA. WTC 7 is an obvious controlled demolition.
BB. By strength and weight.

CC. According NIST column 79 failed at floor 13 or so as a consequence of thermal expansion ... and the whole structure was destroyed. Cannot happen.

DD. Local failures in a structure cannot produce a one-way crush down.

Happy?
 
Than you have ABSOLUTELY NO BUSINESS anywhere NEAR a FIRE EXTINGUISHER, let alone a hose nozzle.

Thanks for proving that you are in fact a fraud.

Ok, just so you know, a HNI is a Higbee Notch Indicator. It is a small notch that is designed into a single lug on the couplings of all hoses that, when lined up properly, will prevent crossthreading. This is especially helpfull because a crossthreaded coupling is more likely to burst during firefighting operations.

Ok, an even easier question for you.

Why do most firefighters carry a wooden wedge in a strap on their helmet??

Or, how about another one.

What are the two tools you will need when disconnecting a hose coupling??
 
triforcharity said:
Than you have ABSOLUTELY NO BUSINESS anywhere NEAR a FIRE EXTINGUISHER, let alone a hose nozzle.

Thanks for proving that you are in fact a fraud.

Ok, just so you know, a HNI is a Higbee Notch Indicator. It is a small notch that is designed into a single lug on the couplings of all hoses that, when lined up properly, will prevent crossthreading. This is especially helpfull because a crossthreaded coupling is more likely to burst during firefighting operations.

Ok, an even easier question for you.

Why do most firefighters carry a wooden wedge in a strap on their helmet??

Or, how about another one.

What are the two tools you will need when disconnecting a hose coupling??
Click to expand...

You are way off topic, my friend. Try to prove that a one-way crush down is possible instead.
But I have to say that I always enjoyed fire fighting training. In principle I prefer fixed sprinkler and similar extinguishing systems.
 
Yeah, because fixed sprinklers did a WHOLE lotta good on 9/11 :rolleyes:

I have already told you, I am not an engineer. I leave that up to the experts.

In my opinion, the only way to demonstrate this is to build a 110 storey identical structure, and crash a plane into it and watch and see what happens.

But, you claimed to be an expert with "Extensive training" in firefighting, and you prefer sprinklers?? How much more idiotic could this statement get?!?!?!
 
Triforcharity:
But, you claimed to be an expert with "Extensive training" in firefighting, and you prefer sprinklers?? How much more idiotic could this statement get?!?!?!
Click to expand...

Heiwa can win awards for idiocy. My personal opinion is that he chews through the restraints on his straitjacket once a day and sprints down the ward corridor to the computer room to fire off a few posts before being caught up with by his nurses who wrestle him back to his room again, re-administer his catheter and make sure he's taken his medication.

Oh, but that's right, he's a nautical engineer.

The shipping industry is stuffed.
 
Last edited:
Oscar,

I will be sending you the bill for a new keyboard. I WAS drinking a cup of coffee, but after reaading that, it was PROMPTLY displaced onto my entire computer. Thanks buddy..........:D
 
Heiwa said:
You ask:

AA. Do you claim that the collapse of WTC7 was impossible?

BB. Just to be clear, is "bigger" by weight?

CC. Does this mean that you believe that, if the failure in the WTC7 tower occurred on the 24th (out of 47) floor, then the failure would have arrested. But that if it occurred on the 23rd, the failure progresses to the ground?

DD. And similarly, for the 56th vs. 54th floor of the Towers?

AA. WTC 7 is an obvious controlled demolition.
BB. By strength and weight.

CC. According NIST column 79 failed at floor 13 or so as a consequence of thermal expansion ... and the whole structure was destroyed. Cannot happen.

DD. Local failures in a structure cannot produce a one-way crush down.

Happy?
Click to expand...

Happy? No. For you, it is a game to avoid answering direct simple, questions questions. An annoying game.

1. With your answer DD, you are saying that Controlled demo is impossible. Bombs produce only "local damage" no matter where they are placed.

2. Please answer question here: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4907221#post4907221

3. Please answer question here: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=4908416#post4908416
 
Thread closed due to length. Please continue the discussion here. Note that the continuation thread has been set to moderated status due to the bickering and derailing that has been going on.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Cuddles
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom