Who does NIST work for? and who put together the 9/11 commission?
NIST is an agency of the Department of Commerce. I know almost as little as you do about the ideological leanings of the bureaucrats who staff it. I would guess, given the nature of bureaucracies, that there are more Democrats than Republicans. Your mindless insistence that this agency charged with determing why structures fail lent itself to supporting an evil conspiracy to do--your side has never figured out what the conspiracy was supposed to do--well, to do
something requires considerable fleshing-out. Is it your position that NIST deliberately publishes reams of bad science? Is Bill Smith justified in fleeing in terror whenever he is asked why no scientists or engineers in countries unfriendly to the U.S. show us the "errors" that are so obvious to angry, empty-headed adolescents? So, c'mon now, why
is NIST so sure that no one will call attention to the "errors"? Can you--heh-heh--show us
ONE of those "errors"? Why not?
The 9/11 Commission was put together to mollify family members of the Islamists' victims. The Democrats on the commission were eager to whitewash Clinton's years of passivity, while the Republicans wanted to lay the entire blame on Clinton, ignoring the awkward fact that Bush promised to do more to fight terrorism. Neither side takes your idiocy seriously.
The answer to both of those is the government of course. So are you saying that the 2 agencies/groups that the government tasked to find the answers to 9/11 cannot be considered "the government" when talking about their theories? If not them then who?
Sorry, you're not in the schoolyard now. People here are much smarter than you and know much more. NIST was tasked with explaining the mechanism by which the towers collapsed. The 9/11 Commission was tasked with bringing together in a convenient, readable form answers to frequently asked questions. As you know, the original investigation that determined the identities of the hijackers was a massive, multi-agency effort. If you want to pretend that your imaginary conspiracy controls the FBI, the CIA, the NSA, and the police and fire departments of NYC and Washington, D.C., no adult can stop you. But don't expect anyone to take you seriously.
And if not them then does the government even have a Conspiracy Theory on 9/11? If not how can they justify invading Afghanistan? (Iraq was of course invaded for other spurious reasons)
When it was determined that the hijackers were affiliated with al Qaeda, a group led by Osama bin Laden that operated training camps in Afghanistan, the Taliban, the rulers of Afghanistan, were asked to turn over bin Laden. Their refusal was based on the conviction that the U.S. would lob a few cruise missiles and bluster impotently in the U.N. They failed to reckon with the man who occupied the White House, who happened to be George Bush, not Al Gore.
But of course this is you playing semantics so you could call Bill a liar, when in truth you are lying about Bill lying and the reasons for it.
As liars go, Bill is a very foolish one, but he does lie constantly. He seems to enjoy getting caught. You are, as usual, wrong, and you were exposed again.
There's the smear and ridicule all rolled into one tactic. This is probably the favorite tactic here on JREF, but to any critical thinker it just makes you look silly.
You are the antithesis of a critical thinker. You are an agenda-driven sheep who bleats assent to any rubbish shoveled your way by cynical, insane frauds.
