Who's really faking evidence?

Jones'
[qimg]http://drjudywood.com/articles/dirt/dirtpics/jones_firemen.jpg[/qimg]

Reality
[qimg]http://drjudywood.com/articles/dirt/dirtpics/5575.jpg[/qimg]

I always love bringing this up, so far I have seen nothing that the Truthers have proven to be faked evidence and yet they do it all the time.

Algebra, BS--don't you guys find this a little embarrassing?

I'll check out the quote you posted Algebra but it doesn't even look that ground breaking and I'm sorry but since it seems to be the OP of the TM to take things out of context, it wouldn't surprise me if that were the case in this example.

PS thanks Dr Wood for the photos. You guys should just stick to debunking the other faction of the TM instead of talking about space beam weapons.
Also, that is a REALLY good photograph. I need to look up that photographer.

No I don't find this picture embarrassng at all. Never did. Did Al say that the firemen were rescuing somebody ? Wow...it must be Superman to have survived a 500,000 ton building falling on him, lol
 
Last edited:
Jones'
[qimg]http://drjudywood.com/articles/dirt/dirtpics/jones_firemen.jpg[/qimg]



Also, that is a REALLY good photograph. I need to look up that photographer.

It's one of the Naudet Brothers. It's the shot I'm talking about in my post immediatly proceeding yours.
 
Last edited:
You go, girl!

All I have to do is sit here and Bill's going to present a series of the worst TM deconstructivist videos (as seen on YouTube, of course).

Hey, Bill... maybe MaGZ will loan you his clips of the missile pigeon at ground zero.
 
Or the video shows a massive pool of molten metal that looks like a rectangle of light on the ground that then on the right shows buldings covered in molten metal!! :rolleyes:

How would all that metal stay molten anyway Bill? No kind of thermite could do it. Guess it must be the goverments dark magic spellz!

No apparently the thermite reaction continues for some time. It carries it's own onboard oxygen supply and can keep the steel molten for considerably longer.
 
No apparently the thermite reaction continues for some time. It carries it's own onboard oxygen supply and can keep the steel molten for considerably longer.

No, a thermite reation is very quick.

So why didnt anyone notice massive rivers of molten metal and buildings covered in the stuff?
 
No, a thermite reation is very quick.

So why didnt anyone notice massive rivers of molten metal and buildings covered in the stuff?

They did Don't you remember ? ' Molten steel running like lava' (FDNY) Molten steel running down the walls of WTC6. Les Robertson and Mark Loiseaux among around 100 other eyewitnesses report molten steel. Try and remember this time. It really is a fact whether you like it or not.
 
Last edited:
No I don't find this picture embarrassng at all. Never did. Did Al say that the firemen were rescuing somebody ? Wow...it must be Superman to have survived a 500,000 ton building falling on him, lol
Do the names John McLoughlin and Will Jimeno ring a bell, Bill?
 
It's one of the Naudet Brothers. It's the shot I'm talking about in my post immediatly proceeding yours.

In the video, if you keep watching, you can actually see them pick up this "Molten metal" and move it to another angle.

Who knew that those halogen lamps ACTUALLY were powered by MOLTEN METAL!! I laugh every time.
 
They did Don't you remember ? ' Molten steel running like lava' (FDNY) Molten steel running down the walls of WTC6. Les Robertson and Mark Loiseaux among around 100 other eyewitnesses report molten steel. Try and remember this time. It really is a fact whether you like it or not.

Oh really, would you kindly list them? And please put numbers beside their names, (1,2,3,4...) so you don't lose count of all of them.
 
They did Don't you remember ? ' Molten steel running like lava' (FDNY) Molten steel running down the walls of WTC6. Les Robertson and Mark Loiseaux among around 100 other eyewitnesses report molten steel. Try and remember this time. It really is a fact whether you like it or not.

Im not saying there wasnt molten metal but you arent just claiming there was molten metal.

Bill no one reported rivers of molten steel and buildings covered in moltel steel.

:rolleyes:

That video must be one of dumbest thing Ive seen truthers use as "evidence".
 
Last edited:
It's one of the Naudet Brothers. It's the shot I'm talking about in my post immediatly proceeding yours.

Yeah I know, that is why I didn't just quote your post. I probably should have though.

And I've seen the Naudet Brothers film, this is a still from that film? I looked at the original source of the photograph but they don't say who took it.

Also I want to see the MaGZ missile at GZ video! Is it still on youtube?
 
Some posts moved to AAH.

Keep on topic please.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Gaspode
 
Last edited:
Wasn't there a photograph of the towers that was altered to look like there were clouds of dust from the base of the tower before the collapse?
 
No apparently the thermite reaction continues for some time. It carries it's own onboard oxygen supply and can keep the steel molten for considerably longer.

[Need a Picard facepalm here]

Typical ignorance. Oxygen is a spectator ion in the thermite reaction. It is an oxidation/reduction reaction between iron ions and metallic aluminum to form aluminum ions and metallic iron. NO OXYGEN REQUIRED!!! :covereyes

Yet another example of fraud from the 9/11 deniers. :cool:
 
They did Don't you remember ? ' Molten steel running like lava' (FDNY) Molten steel running down the walls of WTC6. Les Robertson and Mark Loiseaux among around 100 other eyewitnesses report molten steel. Try and remember this time. It really is a fact whether you like it or not.

Why didn't the survivors in the towers get scalded to death by the rivers of molten metal running down the stairwells of the WTC towers? :rolleyes:
 
Wasn't there a photograph of the towers that was altered to look like there were clouds of dust from the base of the tower before the collapse?

Someone made a short video that explained that the smoke was from a vehicle that had been set on fire by flaming debris from one of the plane impacts.
 
I'm bumping this thread because of this post:
I did some research and found this (and already presented this on polish forum as Aquila):

Stalls from this fake video:

[qimg]http://img717.imageshack.us/img717/7910/fake2.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/3922/fake1g.jpg[/qimg]

(Cruise missile painted like AA airplane).

Now look here:

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/smart/agm-86c.htm

and see photos on that website:

[qimg]http://img576.imageshack.us/img576/4162/calcm990330f3588h002.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://img52.imageshack.us/img52/981/agm86apiiop101141200.jpg[/qimg]

The same photos - what do you think - which ones were photoshopped? :D


I love this stuff. The idea that a bunch of people talking about how the government fakes everything faking their own evidence.

Anyways, I want to know more about those missile images, like who originally made them? I'm in an argument with a Truther right now and he is saying that those could just be examples to illustrate some Truther's hypothesis or whatever and not made to be passed off as real.
 

Back
Top Bottom