Who started both World Wars?

Status
Not open for further replies.
So the Jews are responsible for the 'Glorious Revolution' as well?

here was me thinking it was an umpopular Catholic King went off to fight in Ireland. Then, while he was away a group of the Protestant Nobility seized the opportunity to invite Whilliam of Orange into the country as a Protestant King. I guess everyone else in the world was wrong about that one as well.

Is there any event in history the Jews are not responsible for?

Not in the sad twisted minds of Neo Nazi scumbags.no.The ignorance of history that our Hitler groupies display is truly breathtaking.Discussion with them is pointless.Still,lurkers like me are learning a lot.
 
Really? From the same Dutch wikipedia link:

De naam V1 (Duitse afkorting) of V-1 (Engelse afkorting) was een afgeleide van Vergeltungswaffe 1 (Vergeldingswapen). Eigenlijk was de aanduiding Fieseler Fi 103 of FZG-76 (FZG betekende Flak Ziel Gerät ofwel luchtafweerdoelapparaat).

From this I understand that it's original purpose war air defense (against Anglo destruction).

By the same logic, this:



is a water-carrying device intended for use in Mesopotamia. But I suspect it's only the Jewish-controlled Anglos who use code-names in wartime to conceal the true purpose of secret weaponry, whereas the honest Germans refer to everything according to its true function even when it would be stupid to reveal vital intelligence by doing so.

Dave
 
Last edited:
So the Jews are responsible for the 'Glorious Revolution' as well?

here was me thinking it was an umpopular Catholic King went off to fight in Ireland. Then, while he was away a group of the Protestant Nobility seized the opportunity to invite Whilliam of Orange into the country as a Protestant King. I guess everyone else in the world was wrong about that one as well.

Is there any event in history the Jews are not responsible for?

I never said that 'the Jews were responsible for the Glorious Revolution'. I said that they helped financing it and that they in return where allowed to found the 'Bank of England'.

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=1145&letter=S&search=suasso

Antonio (Isaac) Lopez Suasso: Son of Abraham Lopez Suasso; married in 1714 a daughter of Moses Mendes da Costa, governor of the Bank of England.


http://www.ziopedia.org/wiki/Bank_of_England
The creation of the Bank of England in 1694 is a result of Cromwell's decision to ignore the law banning the Jews from entering England, and allowing them back in defiance of the law. Only thirty-three years later, a Dutch Prince arrived from Amsterdam surrounded by a whole swarm of Jews from that Jewish financial centre. Driving his royal father-in-law out of the kingdom, he graciously consented to ascend the throne of Britain. A very natural result following on this event was the inauguration of the National Debt by the establishment six years later of the Bank of England for the purpose of lending money to the Crown. Britain had paid her way as she went until the Jew arrived." 1694: The name "Bank of England" deceptively gives the impression it is controlled by the Government of England when in fact it is a private institution founded by Jews.


Buchanan will not say it but British politics is bought and paid for by these Jewish dominated financial circles in London, whether it is about the Iraq war of 2003 or the behavior of Winston Churchill. Britain will always work for the interests of the Jews.

In modern politics every British leader has his private Jew:

Tony Blair had Lord 'cashpoint' Levy
Gordon Brown had Ronald Cohen
David Cameron has Chaim Zabludowicz
 
Last edited:
I guess he forgot about the Saxons, Angles, Jutes and Danes who colonized England. I guess he hasn't heard the term 'Anglo-Saxons'? LOL

You are guessing too much, bad habbit.

I know very well that Anglo-Saxon is derived from Angelen und Sachsen, pure Germanic tribes.

They were invaders from northern Germany into the British Isles.

Now a slightly embarrassing question: what kind of Angelen und Sachsen do you think emigrated to Britain? You think it were the bright and shining aristocrats, the ones giving up a good position in Germany, in short the best? Or were it the losers, the huddled masses of those days, the Lads, who were looking for a new life elsewhere? Hint: the Moroccans who emigrated to Holland, do you think they represent the best Morocco has to offer?


Onbehouwen !

Are you trying to market yourself as Dutch?
 
Wow. I'm almost speechless. I didn't expect you to make my point for me so elegantly. Everything, to you, is about race. You are a relic of an obsolete race of superstitious, silly men best left to ancient history.

In the modern world it is almost forbidden to talk about race, thanks to the outcome of WW2 and the interpretation of the events as handed over to us by the victors.

But in their hearts the majority has racial preferences (for their own kind). As a consequence everybody pays lip service to the official morale but the reality is white flight.

There is hardly an article that described the depressing race reality in America better than this one:

The 19th century was imperial and race conscious.
The 2nd half of the 20th century was imperial and 'raceless'.
The 21st century will be post-imperial, identitarian and again race conscious.
 
Angles and Saxons don't bother me. I can trace my roots back to the Vikings. I was born and bred in the heart of the old Viking Kingdom.

I still consider myself to be English and by extension British.
 
You are guessing too much, bad habbit.

I know very well that Anglo-Saxon is derived from Angelen und Sachsen, pure Germanic tribes.

They were invaders from northern Germany into the British Isles.

Now a slightly embarrassing question: what kind of Angelen und Sachsen do you think emigrated to Britain? You think it were the bright and shining aristocrats, the ones giving up a good position in Germany, in short the best? Or were it the losers, the huddled masses of those days, the Lads, who were looking for a new life elsewhere? Hint: the Moroccans who emigrated to Holland, do you think they represent the best Morocco has to offer?



Are you trying to market yourself as Dutch?


Yet another period of history that you know nothing about.Keep that ignorance coming.You are an ideal anti-Nazi advert.
 
First, you missed the essential point of the aircrew loss figures: It utterly demolished your claim of it being a 'safe' way for the Allies to wage war on Germany. Funny how you overlooked that part of it. No mea culpas from you on getting that completely wrong, I guess?

The Allies waging war are the politicians and generals. In their eyes a few hundred of aircrew are expendable.

Second, please remind me: Who was it again who worked in the factories of Germany building the tanks, artillery, fighters, bombers, rifles, machine guns, pistols, uniforms, bullets, bombs, shells, destroyers, U-boats, torpedoes, and other assorted implements of war? Who was it who worked in the fields growing the food to feed the German military? Who was it who worked in the mines who dug up the raw resorces needed for the factories building the implements of war? Who was it who ran the railways which transported the raw resources to the factories and the finished goods to the men fighting at the fronts? Who was it who worked in the oil refineries and electrical plants which provided the energy to power German military production and fuel the military's vehicles and vessels? Who was it who supplied the replacements for those military personnel who were killed or captured during battle?

Who could it be? Oh, yes, CIVILIANS.

The point you constantly avoid addressing: Without the vital input of the German civilian population, the war would have come to a quick halt. Armies cannot fight without equipment and provisions, especially large militaries with large arsenals.

No civilians, no economy; no econonmy, no military; no military, no war.

Well then, Corsair is basically pleading for the next time to kill the entire population, because you see, these civilians are all somehow involved in the war effort. Mind you, Corsair is talking about a war that was declared by the Anglos, not by Germany. And do not give me this BS about Poland because the Anglos never cared about Poland, they gave it on a silver platter to the USSR after the war. The frightning point is that Corsair is not even trying to hide his intentions and gives an unlimited licence to kill to himself and his kind.

It seems you're just jealous of the fact that the Allies were able to do to Germany what Germany wanted to do but failed to do to its enemies. But then, Germany was dumb enough to fight a war where the GDP of its rivals outnumbered it by some two to one. Pretty stupid, that. War between industrialized nation-states is, first and foremost, a war of attrition. Whichever side produces the most for the longest wins. One side electing to wage war when it's on the short end of a 2:1 production ratio has chosen to lose. Painfully.

I am not jealous because I am Dutch. What I am not buying however is your moralistic BS stories of your kind about the so-called good war. It was your kind who sought the war because your Jewish overlords told you to do so, that is the Jewish financial backers of Churchill and Zionist mob around Roosevelt. They order to jump and the Anglos ask: "how high?".

About Chamberlain (the one who really defended British interests):

The American Secretary of State, James Forrestal, who later died in mysterious circumstances, wrote in his Forrestal Diaries (Cassel and Co., London 1952):

'Have played golf with Joe Kennedy [US Ambassador in Britain, father of President John Kennedy]. According to him, Chamberlain declared that Zionism and world Jewry have obliged England to enter the war.'

Corsair again:

Do tell me, if you're sitting in the chair of the Allies high command, how do you prosecute the war? What is your strategy? How do you intend to prevent German industry from building war material? Ask them nicely not to?

I would not have declared war on Germany in the first place.

It seems you're ignoring the most obvious reason: Demonstrating once and for all the futility of Japan to continue fighting when it was clear to every other sane person the nation had lost the war. And yet, even after being hit by an atomic bomb, Japan still didn't surrender. It took a second atomic bomb to finally convince them to give up. Stubborn bunch of folks, it seems. Suicidally stubborn, in fact.

Why was it necessary to look for war with Japan in the first place? Ah wait, your Jewish overlords wanted to grab world power at the expense of everybody else. In this light you can throw any number of atom bombs because, you see, any resistance would be suiocidal.

It's fine if you declare yourself as the completely unrestricted Machiavellist and totally let go any moral consideration, but than you should not be surprised that the rest of the world will turn against you. You probably did not notice but the US and Israel are not very popular in the world and we all smell the (financial) blood that is visibly pooring from your wounds.

USA 2020 equals Ukraine 2010.

http://dollarcollapse.com/
 
Last edited:
Why don't you get yourself a nice girl/boyfriend and a relaxing hobby. Fishing is is good, plenty of fresh air, the thrill of the hunt, nice gadgets and tackle to collect. Maybe try a new job. Turn off the Internet and go outside in the sunshine, there is a whole world out there that isn't full of hate and lies.

I am sure you will have a better outlook on life.
 
You think it were the bright and shining aristocrats, the ones giving up a good position in Germany, in short the best?

The hardy intelligence ones who invaded and drove the Romanized Britans from their lands - like you know otherwise 'Mr. History-is-a-mystery-to-me'

Come on 9/11 confess untill you looked it up you had no idea what the Angles and Saxons were or what they did. You were banging around 'anglos' without even knowing what you were talking about...right? You were saying in effect ...'Germans'...LOL

Double LOL

Here are those questions you keep dodging the third time we've asked....we'll keep track for all the lurkers

Tell us about operation Tannenbaum? Were the Swiss going to attack the Germans? Or were the German's planning to save the Swiss from an Anglo invasion?

What is the importance of 'veetig'?

What did you think of Anton's treason against the Dutch?

Tell us why the German's invaded Luxembourg then treated those fine people so harshly? Were the Luxies going to attack Germany?

All questions will repeat until properly answered


Well then, Corsair is basically pleading for the next time to kill the entire population, because you see, these civilians are all somehow involved in the war effort. Mind you, Corsair is talking about a war that was declared by the Anglos, not by Germany.

From Mein Kampf and the plans for East were what again?

Poland 9/11 remember Poland LOL I guess you didn't what .....vergeetachtig?? LOL
 
Last edited:
Why don't you get yourself a nice girl/boyfriend and a relaxing hobby. Fishing is is good, plenty of fresh air, the thrill of the hunt, nice gadgets and tackle to collect. Maybe try a new job. Turn off the Internet and go outside in the sunshine, there is a whole world out there that isn't full of hate and lies.

I am sure you will have a better outlook on life.

Yeah man get a more useful hobby like tearing pages out of library books or somethin'
 
So, basically we have this small group of people that is capable of manipulating everything around them, controlling huge numbers of the population without them knowing it (except for a select few), and you want us to oppose them.
Sorry, I'm joining up. You can stay on the losing side if you want, but I want to be with the winners.
What do I have to do? I'm already circumcised and everything!

P.S. Why is it that the "select few" always seem to be nuttier than Aunt Martha's fruitcake?
 
So, basically we have this small group of people that is capable of manipulating everything around them, controlling huge numbers of the population without them knowing it (except for a select few), and you want us to oppose them.
Sorry, I'm joining up. You can stay on the losing side if you want, but I want to be with the winners.
What do I have to do? I'm already circumcised and everything!

P.S. Why is it that the "select few" always seem to be nuttier than Aunt Martha's fruitcake?

Hell yeah I mean if they are THAT powerful I'm joining that team! Hey I had a Jewish girlfriend once that should count for something!

I mean causing two world wars to destroy Germany! Yep and look at Germany today completely destroyed.....oh wait, er, ah...hmmmm...

Jim think about it we both now want to join the 'first' team. Maybe that was 9/11 plan all along!!! OMG he's a Jewish recruiter!!!!
 
Last edited:
Good thread dude, history is very warped around this subject.

Careful about who you are getting buddy,buddy, with pal. I hope you are not of those who gets sucked into Holocaust Revisionism and World War 2 moral equivilency because it is "daring" and "edgy".
Blind Anti Establishmentism is a good way to go down the Rabbit Hole.
 
So, basically we have this small group of people that is capable of manipulating everything around them, controlling huge numbers of the population without them knowing it (except for a select few), and you want us to oppose them.

I don't want you to do anything, certainly not things you are not able to do anyway. After all you are no Germans. No, I want you to sit back and relax and think that the Gods will be smiling to you for ever. Until the Jews smash you against the Chinese Wall.

Send us a postcard will ye!
 
I don't want you to do anything, certainly not things you are not able to do anyway. After all you are no Germans. No, I want you to sit back and relax and think that the Gods will be smiling to you for ever. Until the Jews smash you against the Chinese Wall.

Send us a postcard will ye!

Well, since you're not German, doesn't this mean you'll get smashed against the same wall?
Wouldn't it be better to join the winners, than wait to get smashed, since it's going to happen regardless of anything you do?
Especially since all you do is whine on internet forums?
 
Here are those questions you keep dodging the third time we've asked....we'll keep track for all the lurkers

Well, well, Hans is using majestic plural.

Tell us about operation Tannenbaum? Were the Swiss going to attack the Germans? Or were the German's planning to save the Swiss from an Anglo invasion?

What is the importance of 'veetig'?

What did you think of Anton's treason against the Dutch?

Tell us why the German's invaded Luxembourg then treated those fine people so harshly? Were the Luxies going to attack Germany?

All questions will repeat until properly answered

Looks like I have a stalker.

"Veetig"... that's local dialect for your flatulence?

Seriously. I am not going to guess what you want to hear. If you want to make a point regarding Switserland, Luxemburg, Antoin, etc. make your point.

Don't be surprised if you get a warning from the mods for the stalking you just announced.
 
Sorry no 9/11 it won't work. Asking questions on topic that you refuse to answer is not 'stalking' - try again your fourth dodge of the questions is noted and laughted at.

LOL

My, my don't know what veetig stands for huh I guess that makes you a light weight 'historian'. So we can now drop that question - see you can answer questions.

The questions are asked again. Answer them its part of your thread - ya know.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom