Who Feels Like Debunking a Debunker Debunker?

I liked this part:

This point is almost silly: "Not one of the leading conspiracy theorists has a background in engineering, construction or related fields." Physics is not considered a related field apparently. And what of computer science? After all, the government explanation of the fall of the twin towers relies on a computer simulation.

In other words:

A computer expert is qualified to assess/critique the work of structural engineers because structural engineers use computers.

Okay ... :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Leave it to the twoofers who can't dispute the evidence...so they come up with an unanswerable question. A question that most likely had no bearing or contemplation in a terrorist mindset.
It could be just like asking a twoofer if a tree falls in a forest and no one was around to hear it, would it still make a sound? I would bet there was a long pause before they answered.
 
Ask the clown why it is impossible to find a champion of Da Twoof who has the stones to face Mark and Arthur Scheuerman on "Hardfire." I thought the collapse of WTC 7 was an "obvious" demolition. There must be somebody who can make the case.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom