Eh? Here are the terms of his condemnation in 1633. From http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/galileo/condemnation.html... Well in Galileo's case it was mainly irritating certain important people and publicly insulting his former patron Pope Urban VIII. Then there was his inability, when challenged, to support his stated beliefs with facts. Further the Copernican hypothesis did contradict the church's teachings and was therefore heretical. Given that Galileo was unable to show it was correct her was adjudged guilty, though not of heresy.
We say, pronounce, sentence, and declare that you, the said Galileo, by reason of the matters adduced in trial, and by you confessed as above, have rendered yourself in the judgment of this Holy Office vehemently suspected of heresy, namely, of having believed and held the doctrine—which is false and contrary to the sacred and divine Scriptures—that the Sun is the center of the world and does not move from east to west and that the Earth moves and is not the center of the world; and that an opinion may be held and defended as probably after it has been declared and defined to be contrary to the Holy Scripture; and that consequently you have incurred all the censures and penalties imposed and promulgated in the sacred canons and other constitutions, general and particular, against such delinquents. From which we are content that you be absolved, provided that, first, with a sincere heart and unfeigned faith, you abjure, curse, and detest before use the aforesaid errors and heresies and every other error and heresy contrary to the Catholic and Apostolic Roman Church in the form to be prescribed by us for you.
Last edited: