• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Split Thread Where is the evidence for Flight 77?

vinniem said:
Do you have a source for the bolded statement?

The video shows an employee of Iron Mountain confirming that Flight 93 wreakage is there.
Click to expand...
Do you have an independent source verifying that the aircraft debris is there?
 
Algebra34 said:
Why can't debunkers just say they don't have it? It's not like they need to admit it means something. They just can't admit it wasn't done. That's all I was trying to point out.

Most of the physical evidence surrounding 9/11 was destroyed before a real investigation could be conducted.

Debunkers rely on that destruction.
Click to expand...

When considered in the context of the massive amount of evidence we have for what happened on 9/11, the disposition of the Flight 77 debris is uninteresting and irrelevant. Nothing that could possibly have been done with the debris can add to or change the basic story;

19 Arab Islamists hijacked 4 commercial jets and crashed them. This caused all the death and destructionon 9/11.
 
Last edited:
Algebra34 said:
I really am sorry debunkers have no evidense of any of the 9/11 plane debris. That's all I was ever trying to say.
Click to expand...
8 years of failure, marked with susspetion of 2 weeks. Typical truth member in the vapor movment which only truth is 10 dollar DVDs, begging for money, and spewing lies for 8 years.

flt93debris11b.jpg

No evidnece to you means what? failure?
flt93debris11c.jpg

Flight 93 had evidence; now 77, is there real evidence used at trail for 77?

Yes
77engine.jpg

77's engine; you posted poorly; you were wrong; maybe next time an event happens you will figure it out faster than 8 years.


heloportSean.jpg

I see lots of aircraft parts, but I was trained to spot aircraft parts, maybe you need training instead of 2 weeks suspension. Can you see part of aircraft or do you need glasses and training?
pentagonbrickwall.jpg

Parts of aircraft, but you can't see them; do you have learning disability? People parts too, it is sad you can't contact relatives of victims and expose 911 there is no evidence of 77 at the Pentagon on 911; you would be without evidence. So you are calling firemen lairs when they found people and aircraft in the Pentagon? Who else is a liar in your delusions?
 
Last edited:
leftysergeant said:
Do you have an independent source verifying that the aircraft debris is there?
Click to expand...

Are we rejecting the news report because a source hasn't verified it?

If you would like to play that game then there is a positive raft of debunker claims that are based on news articles that are unverified, where should I start?
 
vinniem said:
Are we rejecting the news report because a source hasn't verified it?

If you would like to play that game then there is a positive raft of debunker claims that are based on news articles that are unverified, where should I start?
Click to expand...

I'll bite! Start a thread on such topic Vinni.
 
vinniem said:
Are we rejecting the news report because a source hasn't verified it?

If you would like to play that game then there is a positive raft of debunker claims that are based on news articles that are unverified, where should I start?
Click to expand...

We start by studying all the physical and forensic evidence and all the eyewitness statements we can find and read each one in it's entirety.

Any specific report has to be put in the context of all of the above. When you do that, each report can be evaluated for what it's worth.
 
When a reporter makes an error in their favor the truthers pounce all over it. When a reporter makes an error not in their favor truthers ignore it.
 
leftysergeant said:
Iron Mountain stories sound kind of like the "pools of molten steel" stories. No valid source.
Click to expand...

Sticking to flight 93, do you have an independent source that 95% of the plane was recovered?

You see, you set a dangerous precedent here. I can now reject your factoids if they only have a news source.
 
vinniem said:
Sticking to flight 93, do you have an independent source that 95% of the plane was recovered?
Click to expand...

yes, the FBI. please come back and join us in 2010. 95% of the plane was found in 2001, shortly after the crash

FBI is the source, so they are credible since they handled the investigation and have FIRST HAND knowledge.

However, your reporter is nothing of the sort.
 
vinniem said:
Sticking to flight 93, do you have an independent source that 95% of the plane was recovered?

You see, you set a dangerous precedent here. I can now reject your factoids if they only have a news source.
Click to expand...

"One source" beats zero sources, which is the case for much of the assertions by the no-planers.

All reports and claims get examined in the context the massive pile of all physical and forensic evidence we have. We know that thousands of people were first-hand participants in the investigation of each crash site. For the public story to be fake, those people would know it and over the past years, someone would have blown the whistle. It might even be a death-bed statement.

You have nothing.
 
vinniem said:
Just came by to see if the "skeptics" have found any evidence that identifies Flight 77. Sursprise, surprise, they haven't.

Oh well, keep looking, you might find something in the end.
Click to expand...

Do you have any evidence that you exist?

No birth certificates or ID cards, please. Those can be faked.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom