What's your theory about 9/11?

You Rock Hans Peper

If the file is closed, what are you doing here ?
Is it your job to tell the sceptic people that they shall go to sleep ?

You draw the victims into the discussion, do you think they are satisfied with your work if they would hear that thousands of people are sceptic ?

We are sceptic, since 12 years. We are the hope of the victims, not you.
If there is a minimum chance to find the real terrorists, the familys of the victims are looking at us sceptical mankind.

Where I am ?

I'm on my way.

Kick it dude. You rock.:D Yes, if 9/11 wasn't a false flag operation they wouldn't be here, anonymously, poised to swarm and badger anyone who says otherwise.

Be sure to notice, in the real world, there are NO groups of people, professional or not, defending the 9/11 Original Conspiracy Theory(OCT).
 
Let's go on

Yeah,
this private dispute keeps to nothing at all.

Looking forward and back to work.

I will soon return, with the next part, if requsted.

regards Hans Peper
 
Last edited:
Hmmm, quite the eye.


AisW_2_zpsf872adf9.png
 
Last edited:
Yes, if 9/11 wasn't a false flag operation they wouldn't be here, anonymously, poised to swarm and badger anyone who says otherwise.

And if "over-unity energy" were not a reality that is being squelched by Big Oil then there wouldn't be lines of JREFERs explaining why "over-unity energy" is impossible. Therefore it does exist and is being squelched by Big Oil and those JREFERs are shills for Big Oil.

I get it now.
 
Hans Peper said:
I am new in the conspiracy business.

Hans Peper said:
We are sceptic, since 12 years. We are the hope of the victims, not you.


Ah so... Anyway, are a few shots from Full Metal Jacket that in all probability don't have the slightest thing to do with 9/11 the only thing you came up with so far after 12 years of noble questing for truth and hope or is there more?
 
Ah so... Anyway, are a few shots from Full Metal Jacket that in all probability don't have the slightest thing to do with 9/11 the only thing you came up with so far after 12 years of noble questing for truth and hope or is there more?


No, there is no more.

I am fascinated about the possibility that Kubrick gives that hints about 911.
And he is a genius, so it is worth to follow that track to see, what it is with it.

Hans
 
I am fascinated about the possibility that Kubrick gives that hints about 911. And he is a genius, so it is worth to follow that track to see, what it is with it.


And by all accounts he was also a nice and decent chap (except sometimes towards his actors) and we can assume that he was neither able to look into the future, nor did he leave any hints in Full Metal Jacket that could have been decoded in any meaningful way, so what exactly are you implying here? That he was a significant part of a conspiracy that killed thousands of people?
 
Hmmm, quite the eye.


We just finished the topic of M and A and Y...
I became convinced from Mac and carlitos facts.

But I also said, when I see the fairground shooting scene I get remenbered at New York. It happens inside the scene where the monolithe is burning.

And there are more points, I will post it soon.
 
... so what exactly are you implying here? That he was a significant part of a conspiracy that killed thousands of people?


A genius like him, will never do that. See his works, you will agree.

What was his intention ? I will find out. A man like him won't give a single hint which will not really help.
There must be more hints. If I know his way of working, its more easy to find further hints.

If there is nothing in it, okay. But such a track must be checked.
 
A genius like him, will never do that. See his works, you will agree. What was his intention ? I will find out. A man like him won't give a single hint which will not really help. There must be more hints. If I know his way of working, its more easy to find further hints.


Ok, so I guess we can imagine it like this: 1985, Stanley Kubrick begins filming Full Metal Jacket. Let's just accept that somehow he knows that in 16 years someone will destroy the World Trade Center and kill thousands of people, but hey, he cannot just speak up, so he only puts some hints in the movie that can not possibly be decoded beforehand, and even afterwards it requires an enormous amount of imagination. It's basically just a signature that says "hey, sheeple, I knew it". Is that your working hypothesis? Or did he just smoke something and had a vision he himself did not understand?
 
Ok, so I guess we can imagine it like this: 1985, Stanley Kubrick begins filming Full Metal Jacket. Let's just accept that somehow he knows that in 16 years someone will destroy the World Trade Center and kill thousands of people, but hey, he cannot just speak up, so he only puts some hints in the movie that can not possibly be decoded beforehand, and even afterwards it requires an enormous amount of imagination. It's basically just a signature that says "hey, sheeple, I knew it". Is that your working hypothesis? Or did he just smoke something and had a vision he himself did not understand?


My working hypothesis is that he knows something at that time and he pointed it out.
And as much as I know people like him (Genius painters), I await more facts from him. He will not only point out what will happen, he will point out who planed the attack. And I hope he will give an device.
 
My working hypothesis is that he knows something at that time and he pointed it out.
And as much as I know people like him (Genius painters), I await more facts from him. He will not only point out what will happen, he will point out who planed the attack. And I hope he will give an device.

Don't hold your breath. Stanley Kubrick is dead.
 
Thanks, I'm familiar with the german word. I grew up with that language. The problem is that you are not applying any skepticism to the thoughts that cross your mind when you watch Kubrick movies. You should follow the advice you give in your signature there.
 
Thanks, I'm familiar with the german word. I grew up with that language. The problem is that you are not applying any skepticism to the thoughts that cross your mind when you watch Kubrick movies. You should follow the advice you give in your signature there.


Know what ya mean.

I do not trust my brain, because it fails a lot. I trust my nose and the dog running in front of me.

See this link, you see it hundred times, but your brain falls into the trap every time. The brain knows that it is wrong, but it fails again and again.
You cannot trust your brain, but your subconscious mind can be trusted.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=vhoSqSHMIAc&feature=endscreen

warm regards Hans
 
I have not failed.

I see the twin towers in the final scene.
I see the monolithe burning
I see some letters reminding me at New York (is that better?) cut in from Kubrick while the monolith is burning.
I see Kubricks interwiev where he is pointing to that scenes.

I see that, you not. Who failed ?
Maybe me, or you, or both. I do not want to force you to agree what I see.
I respect other meanings.

I asked if someone heared about, that Kubrick gave hints to 911.

Until now, I get no answer from you but a lot of comments to my person and the way I how am working. I am not in anger because of that, I found everywhere the same reactions.

Hans

Fine example of subjective epistemology (How do you know you are right- by subjective individual, not universal standards).

cartooon0001_zps60eed934.jpg
 
Mahlzeit Hans,

reading what you wrote brought me to remember that I once looked up what that super-scary music during the masked ball in Eyes Wide Shut is - you'll know what I mean when you hear it. It's a piece by Jocelyn Pook which includes a chant by a Romanian priest played backwards. Maybe you should mirror it back and ask a Romanian what it means - in case he's chanting "Bush blew will blow up the Towers" or something? :D:)
 
Last edited:
How on Earth can a film director who died before the events in question have been involved in 9/11???
 

Back
Top Bottom