What's your theory about 9/11?

Justin39640 said:
You should study what happened to the Soviets when they went up against many of the same "cave dwellers".
Click to expand...

But what would have happened to those "cave dwellers" WITHOUT the funding,intelligence & weapons (stinger missiles) provided by the CIA? In fact,I'd go so far as to say (because Brezenski did) the Soviets would never have invaded Afghanistan (the "Afghan trap") had we not intentionally provoked them into to doing so. We knew once they did we could use our "Islamic militant" assets to give them a prolonged 'Vietnam' like war that we hoped would lead to their collapse. Everyone should read Zbignew Brezenski's interview in Le Nouvel Observateaur Jan. 1998
The plan worked the USSR is no more,but GONE TOO was the apparent need for the USA to continue to maintain a huge,Cold War sized military. And everyone was expecting a MASSIVE downsizing,world wide base closings (why bases in Western Europe with the Soviet's gone?) UNTIL 911 came along and 'SAVED' them. And best,yet, it came at the hands of the same "Islamic assets" we'd use to bring down the USSR in the first place. So,what did 911 do for the CIA? FBI budget? Military budget? Tell me why I should believe they 'innocently' failed us?
 
I have a really out there and wild theory.

Two planes crashed into the buildings causing irreversible structural damage and eventual collapse. Crazy, I know.
 
FrankHT said:
But what would have happened to those "cave dwellers" WITHOUT the funding,intelligence & weapons (stinger missiles) provided by the CIA? In fact,I'd go so far as to say (because Brezenski did) the Soviets would never have invaded Afghanistan (the "Afghan trap") had we not intentionally provoked them into to doing so. We knew once they did we could use our "Islamic militant" assets to give them a prolonged 'Vietnam' like war that we hoped would lead to their collapse. Everyone should read Zbignew Brezenski's interview in Le Nouvel Observateaur Jan. 1998
The plan worked the USSR is no more,but GONE TOO was the apparent need for the USA to continue to maintain a huge,Cold War sized military. And everyone was expecting a MASSIVE downsizing,world wide base closings (why bases in Western Europe with the Soviet's gone?) UNTIL 911 came along and 'SAVED' them. And best,yet, it came at the hands of the same "Islamic assets" we'd use to bring down the USSR in the first place. So,what did 911 do for the CIA? FBI budget? Military budget? Tell me why I should believe they 'innocently' failed us?
Click to expand...

This is your fodder for making up lies about 911, off topic paranoid political claptrap? Your theory of 911 failed with crazy claims, using the SOF as part of your cover-up-inside-job nonsense.
 
FrankHT said:
But what would have happened to those "cave dwellers" WITHOUT the funding,intelligence & weapons (stinger missiles) provided by the CIA? In fact,I'd go so far as to say (because Brezenski did) the Soviets would never have invaded Afghanistan (the "Afghan trap") had we not intentionally provoked them into to doing so. We knew once they did we could use our "Islamic militant" assets to give them a prolonged 'Vietnam' like war that we hoped would lead to their collapse. Everyone should read Zbignew Brezenski's interview in Le Nouvel Observateaur Jan. 1998
The plan worked the USSR is no more,but GONE TOO was the apparent need for the USA to continue to maintain a huge,Cold War sized military. And everyone was expecting a MASSIVE downsizing,world wide base closings (why bases in Western Europe with the Soviet's gone?) UNTIL 911 came along and 'SAVED' them. And best,yet, it came at the hands of the same "Islamic assets" we'd use to bring down the USSR in the first place. So,what did 911 do for the CIA? FBI budget? Military budget? Tell me why I should believe they 'innocently' failed us?
Click to expand...
Every Monday morning it's the same thing around the watercooler. What if they pulled the quarterback at the half and went with the backup? Why didn't they go for it on 4th down at the end of the 3rd quarter?

Rear view mirrors are so interesting. Things sure look different once you've moved on and all the headlights have turned to taillights.
 
FrankHT said:
But what would have happened to those "cave dwellers" WITHOUT the funding,intelligence & weapons (stinger missiles) provided by the CIA? In fact,I'd go so far as to say (because Brezenski did) the Soviets would never have invaded Afghanistan (the "Afghan trap") had we not intentionally provoked them into to doing so. We knew once they did we could use our "Islamic militant" assets to give them a prolonged 'Vietnam' like war that we hoped would lead to their collapse. Everyone should read Zbignew Brezenski's interview in Le Nouvel Observateaur Jan. 1998
The plan worked the USSR is no more,but GONE TOO was the apparent need for the USA to continue to maintain a huge,Cold War sized military. And everyone was expecting a MASSIVE downsizing,world wide base closings (why bases in Western Europe with the Soviet's gone?) UNTIL 911 came along and 'SAVED' them. And best,yet, it came at the hands of the same "Islamic assets" we'd use to bring down the USSR in the first place. So,what did 911 do for the CIA? FBI budget? Military budget? Tell me why I should believe they 'innocently' failed us?
Click to expand...

Is this where you say Tim Osman was Bin Laden? Sorry Franky, debunked years ago. So, you were wrong about the F-15s, NORAD tapes proves you wrong even though you lied and said they didn't. Now you just ignore that and go blasting on about CIA trained militants, LIHOP for added budget bull ****. For this I have no more patience for you. Bye.
 
Last edited:
fess said:
“Find me a tanker”. Why were they so frantic about finding a tanker when in your previous post you stated a tanker was in the air to support a training mission out of Otis. This tanker, (Maine 85) was in the air to support a training mission that never happened.
Click to expand...

First off,what I assume you're talking about is this: "(Shortly After 9:35 a.m.) September 11, 2001: Otis Fighters Refueled by Tanker out for Training Mission
Edit event

A KC-135 Stratotanker.A KC-135 Stratotanker. [Source: Boeing]The two F-15 fighter jets launched from Otis Air National Guard Base in response to Flight 11 (see 8:46 a.m. September 11, 2001) are finally able to refuel, after they request to rendezvous with a tanker plane that was scheduled to refuel Otis fighters out on training missions this morning. [Aviation Week and Space Technology, 6/3/2002; Spencer, 2008, pp. 153] [Quote-History Commons]

The "Otis fighters out on training missions" were NOT the two alert status F15 jets scrambled out of Otis because of the hijackings. It seems obvious to me that Nasypany (located on the operational floor at NEADS not at Otis) didn't know about the Otis training mission or the tanker put up to support it.
Are you sure the training mission never happened? I think those F15 on that training mission were already up & saw the two alert status fighters scramble. Should I go get?
 
FrankHT said:
First off,what I assume you're talking about is this: "(Shortly After 9:35 a.m.) September 11, 2001: Otis Fighters Refueled by Tanker out for Training Mission
Edit event

A KC-135 Stratotanker.A KC-135 Stratotanker. [Source: Boeing]The two F-15 fighter jets launched from Otis Air National Guard Base in response to Flight 11 (see 8:46 a.m. September 11, 2001) are finally able to refuel, after they request to rendezvous with a tanker plane that was scheduled to refuel Otis fighters out on training missions this morning. [Aviation Week and Space Technology, 6/3/2002; Spencer, 2008, pp. 153] [Quote-History Commons]

The "Otis fighters out on training missions" were NOT the two alert status F15 jets scrambled out of Otis because of the hijackings. It seems obvious to me that Nasypany (located on the operational floor at NEADS not at Otis) didn't know about the Otis training mission or the tanker put up to support it.
Are you sure the training mission never happened? I think those F15 on that training mission were already up & saw the two alert status fighters scramble. Should I go get?
Click to expand...

Nothing you post makes sense and never ties it to your non-theory. You never give a time-line and fail to completely read your sources before posting cherry-picked crap not correlated to anything.

What does a tanker on a training mission have to do with your theory? You have never boiled your theory down to a statement.

What time did the Tanker show up? Did the fighters go get the Tanker, not wait for the tanker to show up. What speed did they refuel at? How much fuel did they take? How many pumps can an F-15 take? What block altitude did the Tanker ask for? What was the AR heading? Where was the ARCP? ARIP?
 
FrankHT said:
But what would have happened to those "cave dwellers" WITHOUT the funding,intelligence & weapons (stinger missiles) provided by the CIA? In fact,I'd go so far as to say (because Brezenski did) the Soviets would never have invaded Afghanistan (the "Afghan trap") had we not intentionally provoked them into to doing so. We knew once they did we could use our "Islamic militant" assets to give them a prolonged 'Vietnam' like war that we hoped would lead to their collapse. Everyone should read Zbignew Brezenski's interview in Le Nouvel Observateaur Jan. 1998
The plan worked the USSR is no more,but GONE TOO was the apparent need for the USA to continue to maintain a huge,Cold War sized military. And everyone was expecting a MASSIVE downsizing,world wide base closings (why bases in Western Europe with the Soviet's gone?) UNTIL 911 came along and 'SAVED' them. And best,yet, it came at the hands of the same "Islamic assets" we'd use to bring down the USSR in the first place. So,what did 911 do for the CIA? FBI budget? Military budget? Tell me why I should believe they 'innocently' failed us?
Click to expand...

Cool story bro.
 
beachnut said:
Nothing you post makes sense and never ties it to your non-theory. You never give a time-line and fail to completely read your sources before posting cherry-picked crap not correlated to anything.

What does a tanker on a training mission have to do with your theory? You have never boiled your theory down to a statement.

What time did the Tanker show up? Did the fighters go get the Tanker, not wait for the tanker to show up. What speed did they refuel at? How much fuel did they take? How many pumps can an F-15 take? What block altitude did the Tanker ask for? What was the AR heading? Where was the ARCP? ARIP?
Click to expand...

It's a non subject. NORAD tapes (Channel 7) prove the refueling occurred around 0955, almost an hour after Frank claims (unproven) that they made a 'low fuel' call. He copy and pasting off the same website, over and over again for the last 4 pages. Nothing new presented. The source is off. Frank lied and said the tapes support him. They do not. He cannot even put it into a coherent narrative. A waste of time.
 
Last edited:
cjnewson88 said:
He cannot even put it into a coherent narrative. A waste of time.
Click to expand...

I gave up discussing this with Frank days ago because he never had a coherent theory to start with. I could see it was going to be utterly pointless.
 
I would just like to know why Frank so vehemently refuses to associate himself in any way with the no-plane/nanothermite WTC truth. Once we as a truth movement established the belief that no planes hit the WTC, controlled demolition logically becomes the ONLY possible way the towers could have fallen.

No-plane truth is the easiest way to prove the nanothermite truth.

What does Frank cover up?
 
Last edited:
Starving for Truth said:
I would just like to know why Frank so vehemently refuses to associate himself in any way with the no-plane/nanothermite WTC truth. Once we as a truth movement established the belief that no planes hit the WTC, controlled demolition logically becomes the ONLY possible way the towers could have fallen.

No-plane truth is the easiest way to prove the nanothermite truth.

What does Frank cover up?
Click to expand...

Frank is actually Bob in accounting, a couple offices down from my delightful corner office here in the gleaming NWO towers.

Whoops. I've already said too much...
 
Here is a simple equation:

T = Terrorists

P = Planes

B - Buildings

I = Impact

T+P+B+I = 3,000 murdered innocent people
 
twinstead said:
Frank is actually Bob in accounting, a couple offices down from my delightful corner office here in the gleaming NWO towers.

Whoops. I've already said too much...
Click to expand...

I've heard NWO perps stack up on wine and women occasionally, but not on both at the same time.
 
Justin39640 said:
You should study what happened to the Soviets when they went up against many of the same "cave dwellers". FYI, the caves were used after the attacks, not before. Cause, you know, caves make pretty decent shelter from bombs and such.
Click to expand...

And who can blame them. As Muslims they can't enjoy common pleasures and on top some idiots accuse them of things they never did.
 
Mikeys said:
C = Cavemen
I = Impact
A = Absurd
Click to expand...

P=Personal
I=Incredulity
N=Noted
A=And
D=Discarded

Got any evidence to support your rather blatant attempt at shifting the blame to the CIA?

No?

Thought not.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom