Schrodinger's Cat
Unregistered
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2010
- Messages
- 3,456
Do you eat apes? Would you raise, slaughter, and then eat a chimpanzee? Note a chimp evinces about the intelligence of a three year old.
Dolphins play with forethought (say, blowing bubbles in a way that they combine so the dolphin can swim through them and burst a big bubble). They recognize themselves in mirrors. Though we have hardly begun to crack the code, they communicate with each other through sound. They are curious and play with humans, and have even saved drowning people. They form alliances. They have assisted other species in giving birth. They learn from each other through observation. Their brains have anatomical features that are correlated with higher intelligence.
It's obviously too early to reach any firm conclusions, but it seems reasonable to give them the benefit of the doubt and treat them like an intelligent species rather than a protein source.
Personally, I'm not sweating somebody eating a river dolphin with a 7oz brain. But a bottlenose exhibiting very complex behaviors coupled with the convoluted folds that a human brain has? I think there are more reasonable sources of protein than this.
This.
On planet Earth, there is a certain amount of protection given to people. It is socially acceptable to do things to animals it is not okay to do to people. Is this fair? it's not for me to say...but at this point, in this day in age, we've made a sort of deal as a species that to some capacity or another we're going to have a set of rules that says you can't just do whatever you want to people the way you can to non people. That's why we have Holocaust museums and not Cow Holocaust Museums memorializing slaughter house cows. It's why most of the world's governments condemn the prison nation of North Korea but not factory farms.
so in any event, we decided to draw the line. And of course there's the point that it just make sense for a species to want to create a set of rules that protects their population, but there's more to it than that. people don't fight for human rights for the survival of the species. They do it because they can empathize with the suffering of other humans. we share a bond with other humans because of our similarities...our base intelligence, our emotions, our behaviors. I feel we want to protect humans because they are like us. Now granted with human to human empathy, you could say that's still just part of a species survival instinct...but for me, when I look at a chimp or a dolphin, and how like us they are, I feel a great amount of empathy for them even though it's not the same as with a human being. But it's different than the way I feel for an animal very unlike me, like a sheep.
i feel empathy for dolphins I think because, like humans, they are like me. (now granted i'm a vegetarian, but i am not against humanely raised meat animals. But i do have MORE empathy and want MORE protection to dolphins and certain other animals) Certain animals stand above the rest in their similarities to humans in the way they learn, behave, think, etc. dolphins, whales, elephants, primates. I think many humans who study them, or have interacted with them, are just amazed at how like us they are. I feel that they are enough like us that they deserve the same special protection that we offer to humans in that you can't just kill them for food or sport....that they are enough like us that, as stated above, we just have more appropriate forms of protein.
Last edited: