By which you once again firmly establish your cluelessness on the matter. Mossadegh resigned of his own free will. He was returned to power because of massive protests by literally all of the major Iranian political parties once Qavam (his successor) announced he would give in to the British, who were very unpopular as a result of doing things like refusing to allow disbursement of Iranian funds in British banks or, say, having established a huge naval blockade against Iranian oil exports. (Otherwise known as the Abadan crisis).
Mossadegh demanded the ability to appoint the War Minister, a horrible ghastly power possessed by the majority of western leaders. In response to a genuine crisis. The horror! A democratically elected official insisting that a non-elected, hereditary monarch make republican reforms.
?
Iran promises no mercy against aggressor
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 11:53:06 GMT
"Mistake can be rectified but the launch of an invasion of Iran would be an irreversible error that we will respond to until their collapse," said top Iranian Army commander, Major General Ataollah Salehi.*snip*
"Enemy threats considering their military power are serious, but we also possess military power," declared the Iranian commander regarding recent threats. *snip*
Full Article: http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=72643§ionid=351020101
Those are the actions of a nation in crisis with a government unable to effectively respond. Powers which were 1) democratically granted by a broad, popular coalition, 2) included exact expiration dates, 3) were given in a valid emergency, and 4) were surpassed by what the Shah took for himself as a direct consquence of US and British action. Mossadegh did show some heavy-handedness at the end (e.g. disbanded the then-present Majlis), but this was AFTER the joint intelligence forces had begun suborning the Iranian government or, in the case of the example given, had already attempted the initial, unsuccessful coup.
This is what the whole thread is about. 
