• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

What was the point of blowing up WTC7

Galileo said:
Either FL93 or FL23 was supposed to fly into it, but never made it. They blew up WTC 7 before anyone found the explosives.
Click to expand...
How do you make up nutcase idea like this? What do you use to make pure delusional posts?


A keyboard (that was funny, they blew up WTC7 and now they can't find the explosives that make no noise and leave no blast effects. Good one



 
Galileo said:
Either FL93 or FL23 was supposed to fly into it, but never made it. They blew up WTC 7 before anyone found the explosives.
Click to expand...

So nobody working in the building, even the maintenance crews and bomb sniffing dogs, ever found any explosives in the building prior to 9/11.

The workers or the government or NIST did not look for explosive residues, so what makes you think that "they" would not just remove the explosives and not mention it.

This also does not mesh with the whole: "They cleared the area and planted the explosives while the building was burning." theory that I have heard in the past.

What was the topography of the area with the towers intact? How easy would it be to fly a passenger jet into WTC7? It was less than 1/2 the height of the towers and how tall were the surrounding buildings? I honestly don't know .
 
Drs_Res said:
What was the topography of the area with the towers intact? How easy would it be to fly a passenger jet into WTC7? It was less than 1/2 the height of the towers and how tall were the surrounding buildings? I honestly don't know .
Click to expand...

should be a cinch if he could pilot half as good as the pilot of FL77.
 
Galileo said:
should be a cinch if he could pilot half as good as the pilot of FL77.
Click to expand...
Flight 77 was aiming at the largest office building, and you think WTC7 was target but loaded with silent explosives that leave no trace of blasts.

How do you make up such stupid ideas? What evidence do you use to make failed ideas on 911?

Fact is anyone can wreck a plane into a building or crash on the runway. Not crashing is a skill pilots strive for, so your cinch is stupid about pilot on 77 being good, he was bad, and if he had not had one of the largest targets to hit in the world he would have failed like his murdering buddies on flight 93. The terrorists only had to be just a slightly better than the believers of 911Truth.

 
beachnut said:
Flight 77 was aiming at the largest office building, and you think WTC7 was target but loaded with silent explosives that leave no trace of blasts.

How do you make up such stupid ideas? What evidence do you use to make failed ideas on 911?

Fact is anyone can wreck a plane into a building or crash on the runway. Not crashing is a skill pilots strive for, so your cinch is stupid about pilot on 77 being good, he was bad, and if he had not had one of the largest targets to hit in the world he would have failed like his murdering buddies on flight 93. The terrorists only had to be just a slightly better than the believers of 911Truth.

Click to expand...

The blasts weren't silent, people heard them. Do you know that it is un-American to defend mass murderers?
 
Galileo said:
The blasts weren't silent, people heard them. Do you know that it is un-American to defend mass murderers?
Click to expand...
You apologize for terrorists. You must hate the USA, and you will never understand 911, or have evidence to support you delusions, or what?

Why do you apologize for terrorists?
 
Galileo said:
The motives of mass murderers are not determined by logic. They just hate America.
Click to expand...

I am not talking about their logic genius, I am talking yours. Or lack of logic, if you want to get technical.
 
JamesB said:
I am not talking about their logic genius, I am talking yours. Or lack of logic, if you want to get technical.
Click to expand...

Galileo is the master of logic. Determining motives is not done by the deductive logic of the Peripathetics.
 
dtugg said:
Has any twoofer ever given any reason that makes even a modicum of sense as to why the NWO blew up WTC7? Any twoofer that still posts here want to take a stab at it? Keep in mind that I am not interested in how you "know" it was a controlled demolition, I want know why they did it.
Click to expand...

Has anybody done a serious estimate of what it would cost to fix WTC 7? Compared it to what it would cost to demolish and rebuild? My cousin is an architect, and she told me that it wouldn't take much deviance from code before a building is condemned. (Well, something like that. It's been a while.)

Of course, for entertainment purposes, one can construct any number of implausible theories. E.g.: the NWO realized that they had stocked too much thermite, and wanted to get rid of the extra. For one thing, the next false flag will involve bioterror, anyway. What's a vast, monolithic conspiratorial organization to do when their quartermasters screw up and order too much thermite? It's not like you can eat it. You can't even brush your teeth with it.
 
Galileo said:
Do you know that it is un-American to defend mass murderers?
Click to expand...

It is? Doesn't the 6th amendment say that everyone had a right to be represented by an attorney? Therefore it is not un-American to defend mass murderers at all. Which is what truthers do every day so I guess they are just as American as I am.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom