What JohnDoeX thinks we are afraid to post

As someone else pointed out, he is using the FDR of flight 77 which was recovered from the wreckage of the pentagon to prove that flight 77 didn't hit the pentagon.
So I say; stupid or crazy- take your pick.
 
I am guessing, based on the only actual leg work the LTW guys did, with their trip to washington, combined with the JDX calcs, that LC:FC will state that they think a mysterious warplane flew over the pentagon, releasing a missile as it did, causing the Pentagon "Crash".

We'll see.

TAM
 
I contacted a professional engineer who analyses FDR data for a living, and got him in touch with with DOH!

He looked at the data (.csv file) and said that because the altitude data was taken above Vmo, we don't know if it is accurate or not. He's had that pointed out time & time again, but he's won't give up his pet project.

Also, you are using pressure altitude data for something that requires RADALT data (which was not a valid parameter on the DFDR).

He hasn't looked at the DFDR itself, how it gained its inputs, what those senors were, what their tolerences were, what factors could affect the data, etc, etc.

He simply see what he wants to.

I mean, really - if this is such a "smoking gun" then:

1. Why did the government release the DFDR data showing that it did not match the government claim, when they had 5 years to "fix" the data; and

2. Why hasn't it been picked up by news agencies ALL around the world?

Because it's crud, but those losers (that's not a typo) can't see that.

Also makes me wonder - why hasn't DOH! advertised his (Palm)Pilots for Truth(fulness if it suits Doh) forum on PPrune? Thousands of professional pilots, aircrew, engineers, etc from around the world. Civil, military, tech heads, phling wing phlyers, trash haulers, fisheads, knuckleheads, buggys, flappys, ginger beers, etc, from all around the globe.

I think he's afraid what will happen if some real pilots start inhabiting the forum; he'll be too busy banning to actually type a reply to anything. After all, look at the pasting he got when he went to PPrune the first time.
 
I'm also guessing here, but as anybody read a statement from a single witness that saw Flight 77 fly over the Pentagon? No, neither have I.

This crackpot theory just gets more and more credible with every passing moment.:rolleyes:
 
Obviousman said:
I contacted a professional engineer who analyses FDR data for a living, and got him in touch with with DOH!

He looked at the data (.csv file) and said that because the altitude data was taken above Vmo, we don't know if it is accurate or not. He's had that pointed out time & time again, but he's won't give up his pet project.

Also, you are using pressure altitude data for something that requires RADALT data (which was not a valid parameter on the DFDR).

He hasn't looked at the DFDR itself, how it gained its inputs, what those senors were, what their tolerences were, what factors could affect the data, etc, etc.

He simply see what he wants to.

I mean, really - if this is such a "smoking gun" then:

1. Why did the government release the DFDR data showing that it did not match the government claim, when they had 5 years to "fix" the data; and

2. Why hasn't it been picked up by news agencies ALL around the world?

Because it's crud, but those losers (that's not a typo) can't see that.

Also makes me wonder - why hasn't DOH! advertised his (Palm)Pilots for Truth(fulness if it suits Doh) forum on PPrune? Thousands of professional pilots, aircrew, engineers, etc from around the world. Civil, military, tech heads, phling wing phlyers, trash haulers, fisheads, knuckleheads, buggys, flappys, ginger beers, etc, from all around the globe.

I think he's afraid what will happen if some real pilots start inhabiting the forum; he'll be too busy banning to actually type a reply to anything. After all, look at the pasting he got when he went to PPrune the first time.
Click to expand...
Well done, Obviousman!
 
I contacted a professional engineer who analyses FDR data for a living, and got him in touch with with DOH!

He looked at the data (.csv file) and said that because the altitude data was taken above Vmo, we don't know if it is accurate or not. He's had that pointed out time & time again, but he's won't give up his pet project.

Also, you are using pressure altitude data for something that requires RADALT data (which was not a valid parameter on the DFDR).

He hasn't looked at the DFDR itself, how it gained its inputs, what those senors were, what their tolerences were, what factors could affect the data, etc, etc.

He simply see what he wants to.

I mean, really - if this is such a "smoking gun" then:

1. Why did the government release the DFDR data showing that it did not match the government claim, when they had 5 years to "fix" the data; and

2. Why hasn't it been picked up by news agencies ALL around the world?

Because it's crud, but those losers (that's not a typo) can't see that.

Also makes me wonder - why hasn't DOH! advertised his (Palm)Pilots for Truth(fulness if it suits Doh) forum on PPrune? Thousands of professional pilots, aircrew, engineers, etc from around the world. Civil, military, tech heads, phling wing phlyers, trash haulers, fisheads, knuckleheads, buggys, flappys, ginger beers, etc, from all around the globe.

I think he's afraid what will happen if some real pilots start inhabiting the forum; he'll be too busy banning to actually type a reply to anything. After all, look at the pasting he got when he went to PPrune the first time.
Click to expand...

JDX did sign up for pprune and tried mocking Billzillia's marker dots on the windscreen argument. He didn't make much headway and abandoned pprune like a rat on a sinking ship.
 
Alareth said:
JDX did sign up for pprune and tried mocking Billzillia's marker dots on the windscreen argument. He didn't make much headway and abandoned pprune like a rat on a sinking ship.
Click to expand...
More like a rat that gnawed its way into a room of starving cats.
 
Obviousman said:
I contacted a professional engineer who analyses FDR data for a living, and got him in touch with with DOH!

He looked at the data (.csv file) and said that because the altitude data was taken above Vmo, we don't know if it is accurate or not. He's had that pointed out time & time again, but he's won't give up his pet project.

Also, you are using pressure altitude data for something that requires RADALT data (which was not a valid parameter on the DFDR).

He hasn't looked at the DFDR itself, how it gained its inputs, what those senors were, what their tolerences were, what factors could affect the data, etc, etc.

He simply see what he wants to.
Click to expand...

That was your doing? Great work! :)

Another thing that stands out is that the plot times are recorded in 1 second intervals. Unless AA77 hit at exactly 0937:44.000000, the last recorded data may have occured as much as 800 ft from impact. The vertical path likely flattened out(ground effect right back atcha D'oh!) a touch in the final second. That would change both the pitch angle and the rate of descent(using Do'hs crude method of interpolating RoD from the difference in altitude{that likely isnt accurate anyway} between samples).

:solved1
 
Obviousman said:
Also makes me wonder - why hasn't DOH! advertised his (Palm)Pilots for Truth(fulness if it suits Doh) forum on PPrune? Thousands of professional pilots, aircrew, engineers, etc from around the world. Civil, military, tech heads, phling wing phlyers, trash haulers, fisheads, knuckleheads, buggys, flappys, ginger beers, etc, from all around the globe.
Click to expand...


Maybe somebody should drop JDX's forum URL in a thread over at PPrune. That should entice at least a few actual pilots to go there.
 
Mince said:
Maybe somebody should drop JDX's forum URL in a thread over at PPrune. That should entice at least a few actual pilots to go there.
Click to expand...
Or anyone besides's D'oh to post there. There's only been a few posts besides his in the past week. Poor D'oh boy, nobody wants to play w/ him.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom