What is a "globalist"

[dudalb]

When you're talking about a demographic that can barely walk upright and use simple tools, any string of words is an astounding achievement.

The pointy-hat club has never been known for their intellectual abilities. The Poet Laureate of that side of the street, William Pierce, writing as " Andrew Macdonald" lifted a bunch of material from Robert Heinlein - from The Puppet Masters and Revolt in 2100 to come up with The Turner Diaries.

Guy couldn't even write a white power wet-dream book on his own abilities.

God, Pierce even swiped his pen name from Heinlein with a minor change:
Heinlein used "Anson McDonald" as a pen name when more then one of his stories appeared in a single issue of "Astounding Science Fiction" (not unusual for that to happen to a pulp magazine writer).

 

[BStrong]

I spent much of my life, well, 10+ years, working on weapons of mass destruction (actually delivery systems), so I guess I'm one of the few people who actually believes they exist in something other than abstract terms (even the people creating them, i.e. the engineers, act for all practical purposes as if they are designing washing machines), and it is my hope that the lies of the 'globalists' that control the US can be exposed, before it is too late.

If 10 years is "much" of your life, I believe the problem has revealed itself.

 

[BStrong]

God, Pierce even swiped his pen name from Heinlein with a minor change:
Heinlein used "Anson McDonald" as a pen name when more then one of his stories appeared in a single issue of "Astounding Science Fiction" (not unusual for that to happen to a pulp magazine writer).

One of the almost straight lifts Pierce took was from The Puppet Masters.

IIRC, Heinlein mentions Burlingame California (S.F. peninsula suburb) as the site of one of the battles w/ the aliens.

Pierce moved one city south, to San Mateo where the pointy hat club fights off the mud people and race traitors.

Guy couldn't write his wet dream by himself without stealing Heinlein's material.

 

[Hans]

I suggest you consult the web site antisemitism101.com
to answer your questions.

E.g., what are they waiting for? As every Jew knows, they are waiting for the mashiach ...

Okay so your too intellectually dishonest to answer my questions. All we can do is state what you are unable to say:

You are in no danger from the evil conspiracy because there isn't one.

The world is in no great danger from a conspiracy trying to destroy the world/take over.

Anything else you'd like to conceded?

lol

 

[Hans]

It has already happened, the most monstrous crime imaginable, almost beyond imagination, and it is reality. We've, the US and the USSR, have spent 70 years of unstinting effort, endless planning, design, and engineering, using the best minds of 3 generations, to develop a doomsday machine that will destroy civilization if not the human race altogether.

Now, we're just waiting for an accident, misunderstanding, computer malfunction, lightening storm, or even a choreagraphed sequence of threat and counterthreat that gets off the tracks, and we're gone.

The point is the crime has been committed already. And the US globalists are pushing us to the brink in Syria, Ukraine, Poland, North Korea, etc., right now. Completely beyond rational consideration, but reality.

That's a bit silly mankind has always sought new an improved weapons, each more deadlier than before. So you think its a conspiracy huh?

So tell us what the US should do about Syria, Ukraine, Poland, North Korea then - and what you think the other nations will do once we do what you want us to do?

 

[Cosmic Yak]

(1) A card carrying member of International Skeptics is someone who believes whatever is on the front page of the NYT, and nothing else. And they have an unlimited capacity for idiotic comments, such as your comment; this is also a characteristic of the new hasbara. I'm not appealing to any authority here, I have come to this conclusion from careful personal observation.

As I have never read the NYT, I cannot therefore be considered to be a 'card carrying member of International Skeptics'. I trust, Saggy, that you wil then welcome me as a sane, non-gibberish-spouting, non-idiot who should be listened to.

It has already happened, the most monstrous crime imaginable, almost beyond imagination, and it is reality. We've, the US and the USSR, have spent 70 years of unstinting effort, endless planning, design, and engineering, using the best minds of 3 generations, to develop a doomsday machine that will destroy civilization if not the human race altogether.

Now, we're just waiting for an accident, misunderstanding, computer malfunction, lightening storm, or even a choreagraphed sequence of threat and counterthreat that gets off the tracks, and we're gone.

The point is the crime has been committed already. And the US globalists are pushing us to the brink in Syria, Ukraine, Poland, North Korea, etc., right now. Completely beyond rational consideration, but reality.

Let me focus on this one. Saggy, you have said that communists are Jews, and I assume this includes Chinese communists, or at least they are allies. In the Korean War, the Chinese invaded Korea in support of the communist regime, and were beaten back by the US, Britain and other allies, leaving a divided country. Since then, the oppression in North Korea has become legendary. The current dictator is sabre-rattling for all he's worth and the international reaction is a result of both these factors.
Now, phrased in your terms, the situation looks like this:
60 years ago, Jewish globalists set up a communist regime in North Korea, after a bloody battle with US globalists. The aim was to create a situation, 60 years in the future, in which this state of affairs could be used by US globalists to start a war with communist globalists, which will escalate to a nuclear war and end civilisation, in order to benefit Israel.
Is that about right?

 

[Saggy]

Edited by Agatha: 

Please stop insulting other participants in the thread by calling them idiots. Sophistry will not avail you.

let's have a look at yet another aspect of the globalist conspiracy theory ....

U.S. Special Ops Forces Deployed to 137 Nations—So Far—in 2017

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/us_special_ops_forces_already_deployed_to_137_nations_in_2017_20170627


“We operate and fight in every corner of the world,” boasts General Raymond Thomas, the chief of U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM or SOCOM). “On a daily basis, we sustain a deployed or forward stationed force of approximately 8,000 across 80-plus countries. They are conducting the entire range of SOF missions in both combat and non-combat situations.” Those numbers, however, only hint at the true size and scope of this global special ops effort. Last year, America’s most elite forces conducted missions in 138 countries—roughly 70% of the nations on the planet, according to figures supplied to TomDispatch by U.S. Special Operations Command. Halfway through 2017, U.S. commandos have already been deployed to an astonishing 137 countries, according to SOCOM spokesman Ken McGraw.

 

[Hlafordlaes]

Edited by Agatha: 

Removed moderated material

let's have a look at yet another aspect of the globalist conspiracy theory ....

U.S. Special Ops Forces Deployed to 137 Nations—So Far—in 2017

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/us_special_ops_forces_already_deployed_to_137_nations_in_2017_20170627


“We operate and fight in every corner of the world,” boasts General Raymond Thomas, the chief of U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM or SOCOM). “On a daily basis, we sustain a deployed or forward stationed force of approximately 8,000 across 80-plus countries. They are conducting the entire range of SOF missions in both combat and non-combat situations.” Those numbers, however, only hint at the true size and scope of this global special ops effort. Last year, America’s most elite forces conducted missions in 138 countries—roughly 70% of the nations on the planet, according to figures supplied to TomDispatch by U.S. Special Operations Command. Halfway through 2017, U.S. commandos have already been deployed to an astonishing 137 countries, according to SOCOM spokesman Ken McGraw.

US imperialism, with its long track record, has normally been considered a form of colonialism: aggressive pursuit of self-interest with disregard for the sovereignty of others, including forced regime change, invasion, and assassination, often done in defense of narrow corporate interests. This is nationalism, not globalism, sorry. Try keeping the political dictionary out of the blender, shall we?

 

[Saggy]

US imperialism, with its long track record, has normally been considered a form of colonialism: aggressive pursuit of self-interest with disregard for the sovereignty of others, including forced regime change, invasion, and assassination, often done in defense of narrow corporate interests. This is nationalism, not globalism, sorry. Try keeping the political dictionary out of the blender, shall we?

The British empire, at its peak, just before WW II, controlled 1/4 of the world's surface. That isn't nationalism, that is globalism.

The US military in 70% of the countries of the world is not nationalism, it is globalism.

If your dictionary tells you otherwise, get a new one.

Edited by Agatha: 

Edited to remove insult

Just as an aside, I was watching this vid the other day about British imperialism, and at its height, when Britain controlled a large portion of the entire world, the British working class was living hand to mouth.

 

[Hans]

The British empire, at its peak, just before WW II, controlled 1/4 of the world's surface. That isn't nationalism, that is globalism.

The US military in 70% of the countries of the world is not nationalism, it is globalism.

Nope Nationalism oh and counting the Marine detachments that guard embassies as being the 'US military" is a bit of stretch don't you think?

http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2012/04/us/table.military.troops/

This is where we have bases so an actual real presence.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_overseas_military_bases#United_States

Could we see the information and source for your '70%' claim or is this another 'claim and run' of yours? lol

 

[theprestige]

Can we take a moment to acknowledge the Gish Gallop?

The question to Saggy was, how would his alleged nuclear destruction of the world be a win for the globalists?

And Saggy responded by changing the subject.

 

[Hans]

Can we take a moment to acknowledge the Gish Gallop?

And Saggy responded by changing the subject.

I think changing the subject IS the subject of this thread. He seems to be reading from a script and has a lot of material to spew out. As already demonstrated quite clearly he has no interest in a discussion. He is treating this thread like his personal blog.

The question to Saggy was, how would his alleged nuclear destruction of the world be a win for the globalists?

Good question I think the answer is that the evil globalists are just really, really, Really, REALLY evil.

 

[Venom]

... that will destroy civilization if not the human race altogether...

But how is that a win for the globalists?

Perhaps....a different globe?

 

[Venom]

I'm particularly amused by how people hate the so called globalists for different reasons and the anti-Western and anti-Americanism that becomes intertwined in it.

For instance,
1) the warmongers are vilifying the Arab/Muslim world for the globalist agenda.
OR
2) the globalist agenda is allowing terrorism in to the West by pandering to evil Muslims and immigrants.

Israel usually is vilified along with both versions, but some side with Israel against Palestine in case 2).
Case 1) may have elements of 9/11 Truth or other anti-American conspiracy theories.

In both cases, the West is vilified.

 

[Cosmic Yak]

As I have never read the NYT, I cannot therefore be considered to be a 'card carrying member of International Skeptics'. I trust, Saggy, that you wil then welcome me as a sane, non-gibberish-spouting, non-idiot who should be listened to.



Let me focus on this one. Saggy, you have said that communists are Jews, and I assume this includes Chinese communists, or at least they are allies. In the Korean War, the Chinese invaded Korea in support of the communist regime, and were beaten back by the US, Britain and other allies, leaving a divided country. Since then, the oppression in North Korea has become legendary. The current dictator is sabre-rattling for all he's worth and the international reaction is a result of both these factors.
Now, phrased in your terms, the situation looks like this:
60 years ago, Jewish globalists set up a communist regime in North Korea, after a bloody battle with US globalists. The aim was to create a situation, 60 years in the future, in which this state of affairs could be used by US globalists to start a war with communist globalists, which will escalate to a nuclear war and end civilisation, in order to benefit Israel.
Is that about right?

Edited by Agatha: 

Edited previously moderated content

let's have a look at yet another aspect of the globalist conspiracy theory ....

As, by your own definition, I am not an idiot, would you mind answering my question?

 

[Border Reiver]

The British empire, at its peak, just before WW II, controlled 1/4 of the world's surface. That isn't nationalism, that is globalism.

The US military in 70% of the countries of the world is not nationalism, it is globalism.

I know this is tough for you, but try to get your history correct - the British Empire was at its height just prior to WWI, not WWII.

Second, you might actually figure out that in addition to the merchantile and upper classes getting even more wealth, there was a large component of "bringing the benefits of British civilization" to the Empire, several of which are actually of benefit even though the application at the time was exceptionally cynical - responsible government, rule of law, legal rights can be traced to British legal/political theory and practice from the days of Empire.

The idea that British ideas were the best is one that took strong roots and while the direct rule from London is long gone many of the elements remain in most of the former colonies, including the US. And the export of this idea is the core of nationalism - "our way of doing things is best."