I did a report on this in middle school. The experiment that always stood out for me was when they hooked up the electrodes to the plants to "read" their "feelings." Whenever they gave the plants water or sunshine or love or companionship or conversation or music, the readings went one way. And when they gave the plants abuse, or destroyed another plant in front of one of the plants, the readings went the other way. But here's the fun part: when they killed a plant with the intention of using it for food, the readings of the other plants went the "good" way.
So - I'm not necessarily convinced that plants have feelings, but if they do, I think they're down with being eaten. But not with being destroyed for no reason.
I admit, I would like to know much more about how such an experiment was conducted.
For example: How would the plant know the intentions of the killer? Do you say aloud, "I am killing you as waste!"
"I am killing you as food!"
And then commit the dastardly deed and observe the readings?
If you can name them, please do
Dates, places, etc of their experiments too, please
Is there another way to shut them up?"If trees could scream, would we be so anxious to cut them down?"
Mmm, yes, someone wrote a book about that, way back in the sixties. "The Secret Life of Plants" I think was the title. Actually, he was pretty vague about his methods, and what could be gleaned didn't look good. I think you could get exactly whatever reading you desired from his hook-up.I did a report on this in middle school. The experiment that always stood out for me was when they hooked up the electrodes to the plants to "read" their "feelings." Whenever they gave the plants water or sunshine or love or companionship or conversation or music, the readings went one way. And when they gave the plants abuse, or destroyed another plant in front of one of the plants, the readings went the other way. But here's the fun part: when they killed a plant with the intention of using it for food, the readings of the other plants went the "good" way.
So - I'm not necessarily convinced that plants have feelings, but if they do, I think they're down with being eaten. But not with being destroyed for no reason.
How odd--I just read someone's signature on another board that went something like:
"If trees could scream, would we be so anxious to cut them down?"
It is food for thought, if only in a philosophical way.
"If trees could scream, would we be so cavalier about cutting them down? We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason." -Jack Handey

Well... actually, their best guess was that the heavy metal was most akin to actual wildlife. Anyone that has spent some time in the wilds of Africa can attest to this one; Wildlife is very loud and raucous.
It may have been the persistent, throbbing bass, which may have been sufficient to keep the plants subtly vibrating.
Plants respond to wind or other kinds of movement, like being brushed against, with more vigorous growth.
For example, tomato plants that are regularly touched and tousseled are more vigorous than ones which aren't.
Perhaps the stimulation of low-level vibration induces the same response.
The "wildlife sounds" theory sounds bogus to me.
Mythbusters did an episode covering some of this.
Does talking to plants help their growth?
Obviously the plants are psychic.I admit, I would like to know much more about how such an experiment was conducted.
For example: How would the plant know the intentions of the killer? Do you say aloud, "I am killing you as waste!"
"I am killing you as food!"
And then commit the dastardly deed and observe the readings?