• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

What has happened to the UK

He's now helping to set up a version of Pegida in the UK. Says a lot about him.

His actions serious jeopardised the trial. A re-trial would cost millions and would potentially leave the accused on the streets for longer (if convicted).

He's a self-aggrandising racist twonk who deserves everything he gets. No sympathy at all from this callsign!
 
At the risk of derailing the thread, what public interest is there in knowing that (say) a particular eight year old girl was raped, as opposed to her having anonymity which she can choose to break if she wants to? How does having her name, age, address and school bandied about in the press help the child recover from that ordeal, or help her to live as normal a life as she can?

What sort of prurient person needs to know the name of a child victim of sexual abuse anyway? Isn't it enough that to know their age and gender?

Because to tolerate this would be to tolerate a sliding slope that would eventually end in islamo-communist matriarchical totalitarianism... or something.
 
Anyway - back on topic. Allowing people to observe but temporarily not report the trial until all the associated other legal cases are over simply shows an appropriate respect for due process and fair trials.
 
Anyway - back on topic. Allowing people to observe but temporarily not report the trial until all the associated other legal cases are over simply shows an appropriate respect for due process and fair trials.

That doesn't seem to be the topic on hand. This person wasn't observing the trial.
 
Regardless, outside a government building is a public place, no matter what the government declares. The government declaring public spaces as under their demesne is another thing us crazy libertarians are not going to support.
By that definition there are no private spaces.
 
Tommy supporters are trying to find the names and addresses of the Judge and police involved with his arrest and sentence.

This should be no surprise as Tommy was convicted of similar actions in the past.

@JasFazolka "Replying to @robert_marteau @BreitbartLondon @Lauren_Southern
It is a whore from #Leeds and her name is #D********* . Unfortunately, her home address is still unknown . Also, the cops who arrested #TommyRobinson should be docx IMHO. Let them experience the fear of rape of their own daughters. "

and

"Clearly, people who run @WestYorksPolice and most of the British government seems to be controlled by pedophile supporters"

Even Roseanne Barr got in on it

"@therealroseanne Replying to @RealJamesWoods
he has tried to report on rape gangs being protected in UK. He was just arrested-which is a death sentence-please get involved! it's sick pedo ****"

" @therealroseanne
Pedos and their agents are now arresting those who oppose them, in ENGLAND! #FreeTommyRobinson @Nigel_Farage @POTUS #Pedogate"
 
Last edited:
Tommy supporters are trying to find the names and addresses of the Judge and police involved with his arrest and sentence.

This should be no surprise as Tommy was convicted of similar actions in the past.

@JasFazolka "Replying to @robert_marteau @BreitbartLondon @Lauren_Southern
It is a whore from #Leeds and her name is #D********* . Unfortunately, her home address is still unknown . Also, the cops who arrested #TommyRobinson should be docx IMHO. Let them experience the fear of rape of their own daughters. "

and

"Clearly, people who run @WestYorksPolice and most of the British government seems to be controlled by pedophile supporters"

Even Roseanne Barr got in on it

"@therealroseanne Replying to @RealJamesWoods
he has tried to report on rape gangs being protected in UK. He was just arrested-which is a death sentence-please get involved! it's sick pedo ****"

" @therealroseanne
Pedos and their agents are now arresting those who oppose them, in ENGLAND! #FreeTommyRobinson @Nigel_Farage @POTUS #Pedogate"

Crazy, crazy, crazy...
 
@JasFazolka "Replying to @robert_marteau @BreitbartLondon @Lauren_Southern
It is a whore from #Leeds and her name is #D********* . Unfortunately, her home address is still unknown . Also, the cops who arrested #TommyRobinson should be docx IMHO. Let them experience the fear of rape of their own daughters. "

Docx?
 
Then he had no right to defy court orders, nor to appropriate the case solely to increase his own notoriety. Just shot your own argument in the foot, mate.

You don't know what I'm objecting to. I have no issue with the court applying restrictions to people observing the trial. I have said so repeatedly. I do have a problem with restricting people not observing the trial.
 
The government declaring public spaces as under their demesne is another thing us crazy libertarians are not going to support.

There are no public spaces in libtopia. The standard Libertarian viewpoint is that all spaces should be privately owned witch means there is no such thing as a public space.

I have no issue with the court applying restrictions to people observing the trial. I have said so repeatedly. I do have a problem with restricting people not observing the trial.

Observing the trial or not, he’s taking an action that harms someone else. This is a no-no in Libertarianism.

Even if you don’t accept that, he’s selling or giving away something that isn’t his which at a minimum violates the property rights of those involved. “But he wasn’t the one to commit the theft” doesn’t matter either because if you happen to receive stolen property Libertarianism doesn’t acknowledge any right for you to resell it or give it away.
 
You don't know what I'm objecting to. I have no issue with the court applying restrictions to people observing the trial. I have said so repeatedly. I do have a problem with restricting people not observing the trial.


Why? Predjudicial material is predjudicial no matter who publishes it. I know that pesky presumption of innocence is a bit of a nuisance, but it’s necessary for a fair trial.
 
Why? Predjudicial material is predjudicial no matter who publishes it. I know that pesky presumption of innocence is a bit of a nuisance, but it’s necessary for a fair trial.

We have an inalienable right to publish and read prejudicial material if we are not interacting with the trial itself.

We have it period. If a reporter gets to attend a trial, and publishes anyway, that is their right. I'm fine with them not being allowed back, but they have a right to not be punished for it.
 
Last edited:

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom