• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Split Thread What does "MIHOP" mean?

fI am repeating this because you don't seem to get it.
I understand, but disagree with you. Do you get that ?

If you include all possible culprits in the "who" (which is necessary to give the phrase any meaning at all), it becomes meaningless.
As I have said on multiple occasions within this thread, I would suggest that each variable term has limits and scope.

There are a number of "who"'s already listed, which include...
  • Cheney-Bush MIHOP
  • Peak Oil MIHOP
  • Mossad MIHOP
  • Zionist MIHOP
  • Jewish MIHOP
  • New World Order MIHOP
  • Rogue Network MIHOP

The other terms also have practical limits, in my opinion.

Everyone's MIHOP. You, me, my mother, President Obama, the King of god-damned Siam!
I disagree. As I said recently somewhere else...

IF signs of MIHOP emerge from analyses THEN who could be looked at.

Unless "something" can be found which confirms "someone" MADE it (destruction of the buildings) happen on purpose..."who" is redundant.

I'm not going to point fingers at anyone, saying "you did it" before stating what "it" is and that "it" did in fact occur.
 
There are a number of "who"'s already listed, which include...

  • Cheney-Bush MIHOP + The US Government
  • Peak Oil MIHOP + The US Government
  • Mossad MIHOP + The US Government
  • Zionist MIHOP + The US Government
  • Jewish MIHOP + The US Government
  • New World Order MIHOP + The US Government
  • Rogue Network MIHOP + The US Government

Corrected free of charge.

Did you miss the list I posted earlier? You know... the one with the 7,000 FBI agents, more than a dozen different military commands, FEMA, NIST, ATF and Treasury Department and so on and so on?

The US Government knows. If the collapses on 9/11 were caused by anything other than impacts and fire, then the US government knows. If you don't have the courage to acknowledge the inevitable consequences of the scenario you propose, then you're just a coward. If you will not take your own claims seriously, we don't have to either.
 
Did you miss the list I posted earlier?
No, though it had little to do with the meaning of the acronym M.I.H.O.P., contained overtly long and unnecessary quoted portions from a link you had already enclosed, and I have already responded to that post.

If you don't have the courage to acknowledge the inevitable consequences of the scenario you propose, then you're just a coward.
Disagreeing with your viewpoint does not require courage.

What scenario do I propose ?

Calling someone a coward is rather uncivil. Doing so via a flawed logical argument is silly.

I will concede that a twoofer could say with a straight face that he isn't implying that the US government is involved. However, despite the fact that twoofers are pathological liars, racists and morons on a good day, any twoofer actually saying such a thing would have to be even less honest, less cognizant of reality or both than we are normally used to seeing from the idiot brigade.
Who are you referring to as "twoofer" ? Me ?
 
Last edited:
I understand, but disagree with you. Do you get that ?


As I have said on multiple occasions within this thread, I would suggest that each variable term has limits and scope.

There are a number of "who"'s already listed, which include...
  • Cheney-Bush MIHOP
  • Peak Oil MIHOP
  • Mossad MIHOP
  • Zionist MIHOP
  • Jewish MIHOP
  • New World Order MIHOP
  • Rogue Network MIHOP

The other terms also have practical limits, in my opinion.


I disagree. As I said recently somewhere else...

IF signs of MIHOP emerge from analyses THEN who could be looked at.

Unless "something" can be found which confirms "someone" MADE it (destruction of the buildings) happen on purpose..."who" is redundant.

I'm not going to point fingers at anyone, saying "you did it" before stating what "it" is and that "it" did in fact occur.

You seem to have forgotten several other options that have been suggested, including alien powers, the Reptoid overlords of the Earth, and psychic powers similar to those described by David Cronenberg. In fact, I think the list is endless if you are willing to include the NWO. You might as well include fairies, goblins and trolls in that list or even the ghosts that David Ray Griffin tells us travel the Earth communicating with people. Just think of all the possibilities. It's really exciting now, isn't it.
 
Femr, todays date is July 19th, 2011. It has been ten years minus a few weeks since the attacks. 9/11 was the most documented, recorded and heavily investigated event in history. These investigations were conducted by the US government.

If the attacks and the damage they caused were anything other than what the US intelligence services, federal law enforcement, FEMA, NIST, the Department of Defence and a dozen other agencies have been telling us they were for going on ten years, then the US government knows. They know and they've been sitting on the evidence from their investigations and actively covering it up.

What you're doing here, is akin to a child running about the school yard calling other children something that rhymes with "maggot" and when intercepted by the teacher claims he never called anyone a homosexual and then giggling into his hands thinking he's pulled one over on the grown ups.

Your behavior in this thread is that pathetic.

Grow up.
 
You seem to have forgotten several other options that have been suggested
No. I said...
There are a number of "who"'s already listed, which include...
...in the post you are responding to.

I think the list is endless
You are incorrect. At the most abstract level, there are a finite number of people.

However, I'm sure there have been MANY flavours of MIHOP discussed, and many more "who"s to add to the list if you were inclined to do so.

In my opinion it suffices for the purpose of this thread to assert that the "who" is subjective and the "who" can be one of many different entities. A few examples suffice to make that point.
 
Last edited:
No. I said...

...in the post you are responding to.


You are incorrect. At the most abstract level, there are a finite number of people.

However, I'm sure there have been MANY flavours of MIHOP discussed, and many more "who"s to add to the list if you were inclined to do so.


That's your list for discussion with SOT, but if we're to include every speculation that's ever been made about who could have 'carried out' 9/11, there are endless number. Or do we have to limit it to only the choices that you tell could be real? Like the NWO?
 
That's your list for discussion with SOT, but if we're to include every speculation that's ever been made about who could have 'carried out' 9/11, there are endless number.
Endless ? I disagree, as suggested in the post you responded to. Quite a few, sure.

Or do we have to limit it to only the choices that you tell could be real? Like the NWO?
No, you can add as many as you like if you feel inclined to.

Similarly for the "what" and "how".
 
Endless ? I disagree, as suggested in the post you responded to. Quite a few, sure.


No, you can add as many as you like if you feel inclined to.

Similarly for the "what" and "how".

Wow, so let's talk about whether it was the NWO super-secret world government or the aliens from Planet X that MIHOP. Maybe we could tie this in with the foamification theory that Dr. Dusty is working on with Dr. Judy.

You wonder why a 9/11 Truth demonstration can't get more than a few dozen people? Can you imagine how stupid this sounds? The NWO super-secret world government...
 
Hey Femer, if Al-Qeada wasn't behind 9/11. And the US Government wasn't behind 9/11.... then how did US forces "find" the Osama Bin Laden video in Afghanistan that featured him taalking about how he planned the attacks?
 
I still can't believe that there is a thread in the 9/11 Conspiracy Theory forum discussing the meaning of MIHOP. The meaning has always included USG involvement and as SoT has pointed out, the USG would have to be involved since it carried out the extensive investigation.
 
You should start all your posts with that, Disbelief.


Clearly not.

femr2 is so right. Some of these will tell ya' that a super-secret global government code named the New World Order was behind 9/11. The NWO really runs everything and it's only you ninnies here at JREF who don't know this. Even all the guys down at the video store know its the super-secret global NWO that runs everything. Obama can't do a thing without their OK. Right femr2? It's the super-secret guys running around doing their super-secret stuff that only super-secret super-dupper guys can know about.
 
OK, there you're wrong.

No, no, no...he's so right. There's the one where the NWO is run by the Jews. There's another one where it's run by the Freemasons. There's another where it's run by Satanists. There's even one where the NWO is run by alien Reptoids. There's just so many possibilities here one of them has to right!!
 
OK, there you're wrong.

Incorrect. A number of alternate "who"s have been listed a number of times in this thread, from an article written years ago.

If you want a more recent example of suggested involvement other than USG, consider...
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2011/08/9-11-2011-201108
For 10 years now, a major question about 9/11 has remained unresolved. It was, as 9/11-commission chairmen Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton recalled, “Had the hijackers received any support from foreign governments?”
...
Three years later, the commission would consider whether any of three foreign countries in particular might have had a role in the attacks. Two were avowed foes of the United States: Iraq and Iran. The third had long been billed as a close friend: Saudi Arabia.

I don't need to go on a hunt to find endless examples, because...

There is nothing about the acronym M.I.H.O.P. which denotes "who".

"They made it happen on purpose !"
"Who made what happen on purpose, and how ?"
 
Incorrect. A number of alternate "who"s have been listed a number of times in this thread, from an article written years ago.

Try to keep up.

This is a 9/11 forum. Any use of any term is related to that, and to that only.
 

Back
Top Bottom