thaiboxerken
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2001
- Messages
- 34,573
Today they do. Prior to Trump winning, they wanted Ukraine to kick Russia out.His supporters want Ukraine to die, and become part of the Russian Empire again.
Today they do. Prior to Trump winning, they wanted Ukraine to kick Russia out.His supporters want Ukraine to die, and become part of the Russian Empire again.
12 million voters didn't show up for the Democrats in this election as compared to last - are you telling me people are so driven by bigotry they just stayed at home?
I was struck by his comment that people asked him if he was still a Democrat anymore after his apostasy on transwomen in women's sports. Turning this issue into a litmus test when about 80% of the population is on the other side strikes me as political suicide. And the irony is that Democrats desperately don't want to debate this issue, so they can't even claim they are in the process of educating the public and bringing them around to their side. There are some interesting parallels with this forum; note the siloed discussion of most trans issues to "the thread that shall not be named."
His supporters want Ukraine to die, and become part of the Russian Empire again.
Yes. He and his supporters might frame it differently, but he campaigned on this outcome, people voted for him hoping for this outcome, and he's succeeding so far in his attempts to achieve this outcome.What's that? Peace at the cost of Ukraine's independence?
No. There has been an isolationist, America-first faction on the right that was in favor of withdrawing from NATO and winding down the Pax Americana, before the 2014 invasion of Ukraine. They were always in favor of America letting Ukraine fend for itself. They voted for Trump because Trump played to that desire.Today they do. Prior to Trump winning, they wanted Ukraine to kick Russia out.
He's succeeding at what his supporters wanted for Ukraine.
Trump will quickly bring the war to an end. There will be a negotiated solution. Ukraine will lose territory, but the people of Kiew will be able to sleep in peace.
You should have hope with Trump... that no more healthy male Ukranians will need to die in a futile war come January. Putin will save face with a Trump deal. Kamala will just extend the war machine efforts.
Putinwill not make a deal with her.
Yes. He and his supporters might frame it differently, but he campaigned on this outcome, people voted for him hoping for this outcome, and he's succeeding so far in his attempts to achieve this outcome.
It is a mistake to say he's failing at every major issue his supporters claim are the reason they voted for him. On at least one major issue, he's succeeding.
No. There has been an isolationist, America-first faction on the right that was in favor of withdrawing from NATO and winding down the Pax Americana, before the 2014 invasion of Ukraine. They were always in favor of America letting Ukraine fend for itself. They voted for Trump because Trump played to that desire.
There are others of us on the right who are not isolationists, who always favored a strong and victorious Ukraine, and who have not changed our views on this since the election.
Another thing the Democrats probably did wrong was woefully and intentionally misunderstand this.
The reason why Trump won is because 12 million Democrat voters stayed home and "bu bu bu because Trump" isn't the reason for that, men in women's safe spaces was
"Of the 2,128 Democrats who participated, 79% said biological males who identify as women should not be allowed to participate in women's sports."
Not a vote winner for the Dems, neither is mutilating children with no scientific backing it's appropriate
But my clutching pearls!!B) Anyone who is comfortable with allowing a sex abuser into the White House to destroy the economy and allow children to die of preventable diseases isn’t interested in keeping anyone safe, let alone women.
Your ability to politicize and weaponize ANYTHING AT ALL is kind of astonishing. Seriously, I provided a reasonable discussion point about efficiency, and the how incentives differ in the private sector, with no discussion of any party at all... and you're turning it into yet another opportunity to get your rocks off by exclaiming how evil those other guys are. It's tiring.That is putting it mildly. Your own source notes that more than three-quarters of improper payments result from administrative omissions on the part of third parties, such as state governments and contractors. This suggests that anyone looking for fraud, waste, and abuse here by "draining the swamp" is looking in the wrong place.
The factsheet further identifies one of the main factors in the improvement from the early 2010s as being improved compliance from state governments. Let's see, was there anything going on politically in the early 2010s that might have contributed to poor state compliance with federal healthcare policy? Perhaps something that rhymes with "refund Osama dare"?
Medicare FFS in my source was 7.66%. Medicare Part C was 5.61%. I'm not sure why you think 7.66% is less than 5.61%.Is that what your source claims, or did you make that bit up?
The improper payment rate noted in the factsheet for Medicaid is even lower than that of Medicare Part C. Is that because it's even more privately administered?
REalistically, it's not that 12 million didn't show up for Dems this election. It's that the prior election had an absolutely unprecedented turnout.12 million voters didn't show up for the Democrats in this election as compared to last - are you telling me people are so driven by bigotry they just stayed at home?
2024 was a 4% drop from the previous election and apart from 08 was also the highest since 1968REalistically, it's not that 12 million didn't show up for Dems this election. It's that the prior election had an absolutely unprecedented turnout.
Voter Turnout in Presidential Elections | The American Presidency Project
www.presidency.ucsb.edu
2020 had turnout levels that haven't been seen since 1968.
Democrat voters aren't into it. Activists and ideologically captured politicians have been pushing it anyway. Speaking of things the Democrats did wrong.I just think it is interesting how Democrats can be actively pushing for surgery on transgender children at the same they are widely opposed to it.
Democrat voters aren't into it. Activists and ideologically captured politicians have been pushing it anyway. Speaking of things the Democrats did wrong.
All Americans have the right to access the sex segregated spaces and sports leagues of the opposite sex? I didn't know that.Media: What are your views on transgender rights.
Dems: I think they should be able to enjoy the same rights as any other American.
Maga: The Dems want to make your kids transgender.
I guess, I have summarised the American pre-election rhetoric accurately.