dirtywick
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2006
- Messages
- 10,156
probably. i don’t think it’s that complicated.So, the change you like then.
probably. i don’t think it’s that complicated.So, the change you like then.
Here's the thing. I don't think you need to racist to be uncomfortable with change. I think leadership in the most countries only experiences the positive side of immigration. I agree for the most part it is mostly positive but there are negative consequences. Schools with a large percentage of kids that don't speak the language of country in question for instance. That's not going to be the fancy private school or public school in the fancy area. They aren't living in neighborhoods where 20 years ago there weren't a lot of immigrants speaking a foreign language. And the response to the folks complaining about this as mostly been, "shut you racist!" Those folks are going to look elsewhere for leadership.probably. i don’t think it’s that complicated.
You can't at all empathize with someone who's lived in a place their whole life and sees it completely change and finds that disconcerting? The go to grocery they've always gone to and have trouble communicating with the clerk and find that disconcerting? You don't see anything that would cause a strain on resources in say a school with a large population of students who don't speak the common language?i guess i don’t understand the negatives of people speaking foreign languages. if you’re uncomfortable with that, i’m sorry but a political party feeding into that and making it seem negative and scary to manipulate you into voting for them is seems awfully racist to me.
i agree the dems could be better at trying to peel voters back into a more rational and reasonable place with immigration. but that discussion needs to happen in the framework under making people less xenophobic, not where we pretend it’s not imo
Here's the thing. I don't think you need to racist to be uncomfortable with change. I think leadership in the most countries only experiences the positive side of immigration. I agree for the most part it is mostly positive but there are negative consequences. Schools with a large percentage of kids that don't speak the language of country in question for instance. That's not going to be the fancy private school or public school in the fancy area. They aren't living in neighborhoods where 20 years ago there weren't a lot of immigrants speaking a foreign language. And the response to the folks complaining about this as mostly been, "shut you racist!" Those folks are going to look elsewhere for leadership.
The Dems and various center parties in the world can kvetch about the racism but that's not going to get them votes. They need to figure out how to deal with that obvious reaction their policies. The GOP leadership had basically the same attitude towards immigration as the Dems and they all got blindsided by Trump. He basically did the opposite of what the famous 2012 post mortem recommended.
![]()
6 Big Takeaways From The RNC’s Incredible 2012 Autopsy
President Obama’s campaign staff boasted throughout the 2012 race that the GOP’s...talkingpointsmemo.com
The most ironic is number 2. Listen to minorities. He's done better with minorities than any republican since the depression.
This is what most bothers me about the "Its racism" response.
A. Fine, what if it is? You still lost the majority of the vote.
B. Trump is doing better with minorities than any republican in god knows how long. If they can overlook his racism, maybe you should consider overlooking Joe the Plummer's if you can get his vote for some other reason. That was FDRs coalition. Northern Immigrants, Southern Blacks, and Southern Racists.
Worst thing from the last couple of election, aside from Trump winning was Biden getting excoriated for saying he had worked with deplorable racists to get good legislations. Everyone forgets, the original progressives were mostly a bunch or Racists.
You can't at all empathize with someone who's lived in a place their whole life and sees it completely change and finds that disconcerting? The go to grocery they've always gone to and have trouble communicating with the clerk and find that disconcerting? You don't see anything that would cause a strain on resources in say a school with a large population of students who don't speak the common language?
i guess i don’t understand the negatives of people speaking foreign languages. if you’re uncomfortable with that, i’m sorry but a political party feeding into that and making it seem negative and scary to manipulate you into voting for them is seems awfully racist to me.
i agree the dems could be better at trying to peel voters back into a more rational and reasonable place with immigration. but that discussion needs to happen in the framework under making people less xenophobic, not where we pretend it’s not imo
You can't at all empathize with someone who's lived in a place their whole life and sees it completely change and finds that disconcerting? The go to grocery they've always gone to and have trouble communicating with the clerk and find that disconcerting? You don't see anything that would cause a strain on resources in say a school with a large population of students who don't speak the common language?
Oh, I can empathize.You can't at all empathize with someone who's lived in a place their whole life and sees it completely change and finds that disconcerting? The go to grocery they've always gone to and have trouble communicating with the clerk and find that disconcerting? You don't see anything that would cause a strain on resources in say a school with a large population of students who don't speak the common language?
Oh boy.Oh, I can empathize.
In Tennessee a few years ago, a supermarket checkout person asked to see my ID.
"I'm paying cash."
"I need to see your ID."
"Why?"
"For the bear."
"What bear?"
"I can't give you the bear unless you show me your ID."
"I don't want a bear. I just want to pay for these groceries."
"I'm going to call security."
At that point, I just threw up my hands and walked out, leaving the store to re-shelve the groceries I wanted to buy. I went to a different supermarket, where much the same thing happened at checkout, except the checkout person was a lot better at explaining the problem.
It turns out that, in Nashville, "beer" is pronounced "bear".
I see the negatives of having large number of people in the country who don't speak thenativemost commonly spoken language, but there are ways to address that and in the UK at least the people who complain most vocally about people who "won't learn the language" correlate strongly with people who oppose services for migrants such as free/subsidised English lessons.
ETA: They also tend to be the people who don't understand that people who come from an English speaking foreign country (say a former colony) might prefer to settle in an English speaking country such as, say, England, rather than France.
i live in a city that was one of the "sanctuary" cities for the hmong after vietnam. most of the first generation barely spoke english, most of the younger ones do and so on. most all of them tried to learn enough to get by.
what they didn't do is stop speaking hmong.
That's because you're a feckless libtard cuck.Yes, I don't see the problem with people speaking multiple languages, infact I can see considerable upside.
Yes, I don't see the problem with people speaking multiple languages, infact I can see considerable upside.
Sure, a single person speaking multiple languages, great. A bunch of people speaking different languages, great? Or a bunch of folks that can't communicate well with each other?Yes, I don't see the problem with people speaking multiple languages, infact I can see considerable upside.
Sure, a single person speaking multiple languages, great. A bunch of people speaking different languages, great? Or a bunch of folks that can't communicate well with each other?
My reading of P. J. Denyer's post was that they considered speaking multiple languages including the local default is a good thing - I may have projected my own bias onto their words.Sure, a single person speaking multiple languages, great. A bunch of people speaking different languages, great? Or a bunch of folks that can't communicate well with each other?
My reading of P. J. Denyer's post was that they considered speaking multiple languages including the local default is a good thing - I may have projected my own bias onto their words.
Of course we don't want "them" to speak English, we want them to **** off back to Bongo Bongo Land where they came from.Yep, thank you. I've also said that not speaking the local default is a bad thing but pointed out that, in the UK at least, the people most outraged by it also oppose measures to rectify the situation through free or affordable English lessons.