Moderated What Caused the Plane Shaped Hole

yankee451 said:
in Randi World, the mass and weight of the building doesn't matter, only the speed of the wing, which also happens to be as sharp as a basketball
Click to expand...
While driving down the road, a firefly strikes the windshield of a bus and makes a quite obvious mess in front of the face of the driver. This is a clear case of Newton's third law of motion. The firefly hit the bus and the bus hits the firefly. Which of the two forces is greater: the force on the firefly or the force on the bus?
 
Last edited:
yankee451 said:
in Randi World, the mass and weight of the building doesn't matter, only the speed of the wing, which also happens to be as sharp as a basketball
Click to expand...

In the REAL world, the mass and weight of the building doesn't matter because the plane didn't impact the entire building, it impacted a handful of columns.
 
fess said:
A heavily reinforced jet? And you claim others are making silly statements? In fact, I would say that most of your responses are not only silly, some of them are down right stupid invincibly ignorant.
Click to expand...
.
ftfy. :)
 
phunk said:
In the REAL world, the mass and weight of the building doesn't matter because the plane didn't impact the entire building, it impacted a handful of columns.
Click to expand...

I believe the count was 44 columns. A very large handful.

In the real world parts of the jet allegedly impacted parts of the building, so to calculate the jet as one solid mass is a false premise.
 
yankee451 said:
I believe the count was 44 columns. A very large handful.

In the real world parts of the jet allegedly impacted parts of the building, so to calculate the jet as one solid mass is a false premise.
Click to expand...

Actually it's not. It is one mass in motion. This figure is needed to calculate the kinetic energy. The mass of the building is only important if you want to know if this energy is enough to move the entire building. Naturally this would assume that the impacting areas were strong enough to allow the transfer.

This is where you go off. You have not calculated the area of impacts ability to arrest this motion. NIST and Perdue did but, you don't believe in physics so you don't believe them.
 
fess said:
A heavily reinforced jet? And you claim others are making silly statements? In fact, I would say that most of your responses are not only silly, some of them are down right stupid.
Click to expand...

Only some?
 
yankee451 said:
Man, at least read the transcript.
Click to expand...

As I stated before, if you had paid any attention, I did watch the video and at the same time I read the transcript. Certainly not something I want to admit more than twice.
But thanks for finally answering one of my posts.
 
DGM said:
Actually it's not. It is one mass in motion. This figure is needed to calculate the kinetic energy. The mass of the building is only important if you want to know if this energy is enough to move the entire building. Naturally this would assume that the impacting areas were strong enough to allow the transfer.

This is where you go off. You have not calculated the area of impacts ability to arrest this motion. NIST and Perdue did but, you don't believe in physics so you don't believe them.
Click to expand...

This is where you look at the evidence and explain how it is consistent with the tripe you're serving.
 
ozeco41 said:
Exactly.

"What Caused the Plane Shaped Hole?"

The plane shaped hole(s) were caused because the buildings were struck by a plane shaped object. To wit - a plane.

[/thread] :)
Click to expand...

This should have been the first (and only) response in this thread. Nothing else need be said.

Job done. Stick a fork in it. Move along people, nothing to see here.
 
Mark F said:
This should have been the first (and only) response in this thread. Nothing else need be said.

Job done. Stick a fork in it. Move along people, nothing to see here.
Click to expand...
thumbup.gif


I don't think it has been said but...

one characteristic of a plane is that it is plane shaped.


:runaway
 
yankee451 said:
This is where you look at the evidence and explain how it is consistent with the tripe you're serving.
Click to expand...
Your video is not up to the level of tripe. Best suited for Pilots for Truth, or another fantasy forum where 911 truth nuts hang out, who will eat up your lies.

What happen to the people on Flight 11 and 175? How does you fantasy handle murder? Here you are making fun of murdered people, killed by 19 terrorists, and you make up silly lies.
 
Got to love 911 truth vs 911 truth.
This is at yankee451's web site, see OP if you need to see fantasy in action.
12-years after 9/11, the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, with a 500 thousand dollar yearly budget still can’t explain what caused the holes in the towers, instead focusing on building 7’s collapse and demanding a new investigation, an activity much like demanding Nazis investigate the Reichstag fire. Their real goal appears to be to run out the clock while keeping their members busy donating money , but one thing they won’t do is investigate the impact damage.
Click to expand...

Richard Gage is debunked by fantasy missiles and no planes. Gee what did cause the holes the WTC towers. Two plane can't be the answer, that is reality, and Gage knows it is truth, or Richard Gage, AIA master of woo, is an idiot like the rest of 911 truth followers.

The 500k/yr is the answer why Gage makes no progress. If 911 is solved in the minds Gage's cult of drones, there will be no more money for Gage.

Will Gage fund yankee451's wing test? No, Gage needs 1,000 dollar suits, the latest computers, and the 400 dollar rooms, dinner, and first class travel.

There are only a few (not really) who spend money to building fantasy, Disney, Six Flags, and yankee451.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom