What book is everyone reading at the moment?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I just started into Iain Banks' "Culture" novels. "Consider Phlebas" is the first one, and apparently the first straight sci-fi novel Banks wrote.
It's quite a romp...
 
Annie Proulx's Bad Dirt: Wyoming Stories 2. Don't much like it; didn't much like Close Range either. She was once a better stylist than in these stories; she used to come up with fresh and vivid language.

She has a system that you start to notice after a while: no matter what part of the world or what topics she's writing about, she lays on plenty of unexplained specialized vocabulary, and unless she commits a howler, you get a sense -- an illusion? -- of authenticity.

But no writer's cute tricks will compensate for being fundamentally wopperjawed. Annie's dust jacket may declare that she "lives on Crazy Woman Creek" (although the last I heard, she was living up in Centennial), but she sure as hell has Wyoming people wrong. Creating ramshackle primitives with goofy names and putting them through near-Faulkneresque travails may sell to The New Yorker, but it does neither truth nor fiction any good at all.

Of course, I can find holes in anybody's Wyoming tales, as easy as finding commas.
 
Last edited:
I'm about halfway through Kafka's Curse, by Achmat Dangor (1997). A South African novel in which an old Islamic folk tale is acted out in the complex and confusing world of pre and post apartheid society. A feast of prose, highly recommended for lovers of language.
 
I have Lamb by Christopher Moore, as and audiobook. its a pretty good story. (I think he is serious though).
 
Reading - American Gods
Listening - Under Milk Wood (Richard Burton edition)
 
I have Lamb by Christopher Moore, as and audiobook. its a pretty good story. (I think he is serious though).
I wasn't sure about serious... though ultimately he was mostly respectful. I think he didn't want to take on the religious right, so he walked a fine line and made a probable story out of a historical enigma. Lots of authors are doing it these days.

I actually ended up enjoying the Dean Koontz book. Odd Thomas was a likeable hero, and the supporting cast -- even Elvis -- were human(ish) and interesting. I bought the next one in the series ("Brother Odd") today as a holiday gift for Mr.Sis.
 
Mathematics in Fun and in Earnest by Nathan A. Court. Originally published in 1935 and written by a mathematics professor from the University of Oklahoma, it's credo (from the preface) is:
Mathematics in earnest should be fun,
Mathematics in fun may be earnest.
 
Nineteen Eighty by David Peace. It's the first of his novels that I've tried, and I'm not at all sure that I want to read any of the others.
Not that it's badly written - the reverse, the writing is brilliant and compelling. It's just that the subject matter, the Yorkshire Ripper murders (graphically described), plus Peace's extraordinary insight into his characters' inner darkness is very unsettling. Distuburbing even. I'm having to read it a chapter at a time.
 
Last edited:
I'm about a 1/3 of the way through Rendezvous With Rama, and so far I'm enjoying it. I've also just heard they're working on a film version starring Morgan Freeman (who's way too old for the character I think he's going to play). Of course, knowing Hollywood, they'll &$@% it up by dumbing it down to the lowest common denominator. I'm sure they'll throw in some sort of pointless space battle or drooling CGI monsters to sell it to a general audience. (Not that I'm against such things, it just that RwR is hard sci-fi, not a space opera.)

This is how sci-fi movies should look by the way:

 
Last edited:
I'm re-reading Theodore H. White's In Search Of History: A Personal Adventure. For those who don't recall, he was the author of the The Making Of A President... series, and this memoir was the result of an intellectual crisis in his life, which he explains well in his preface. Briefly, he was trying to cover the 1976 Presidential election as he had previous campaigns since 1960, but the magic was gone for him. He did not grow with the times, imo, and did not understand the new influence of the media on politics, and the affect the counterculture had on it. And so, he turned backwards into his own life for his next book.

I read the book once before, when I first got it, but it was a long time ago, as the dates above suggest, and I'm re-reading it now because I've just finished David Halberstam's The Coldest Winter: America And The Korean War, and realized how little I know of this crucial turning point in American history, when the USA was thrust unwillingly into the role of a "superpower". White was a reporter on the scene in Asia during much of this transition, and later in Europe, and his firsthand observations of the players in the drama cannot but help to add to this gap in my knowledge.
 
Just finished...

"Lake Monster Mysteries" by Bradford & Nikell
and
"Why Darwin Matters" by Shermer.

Now I'm trying to read "The Gulf Breeze Sightings" and I think my head may explode.
 
The Third Chimpanzee, by the ever-popular Jared Diamond. Not as good as his later blockbusters, but sane, learned, literate, and smooth reading. Only his rather short chapter on extraterrestrial life is disappointing. I don't think the topic much engaged his interest.

It's also a little dated here and there. That's not his fault. Knowledge is expanding so fast that nobody could issue new editions fast enough.
 
The World Without Us by Alan Weisman. He points out how high maintenance our systems are and what would happen if we weren't here.
 
The World Without Us by Alan Weisman. He points out how high maintenance our systems are and what would happen if we weren't here.

Ditto. Fascinating book, and one of the downright scariest I've ever read that wasn't written by Stephen King. What really got me was the thought that we don't all have to vanish in order for all those systemic breakdowns to occur; we just need an emergency--like, say, a good solid pandemic--keeping the right (or wrong) people off work for a while, and the failsafes could well start to fail.

In summary - yikes. :boggled:
 
I just started into Iain Banks' "Culture" novels. "Consider Phlebas" is the first one, and apparently the first straight sci-fi novel Banks wrote.
It's quite a romp...

"Use of Weapons" is one of my favourite books, I slightly prefer it to "Consider Phlebas".

It's quite a romp

"...flinging the wo vessels across the four-dimensional void at an equivalent speed in real space of rather less than ten light-years per hour. At the time, this was considered particularly fast"

That is my favourite line in Consider Phlebas

It would only take such ships a thousand hours to cross the 10k-light year diameter sphere of water that one would need to have a molecule of "active" ingrendient in a homeopathic 10C solution...
 
I just finished "Letter to a Christian Nation" by Sam Harris.

I am in the middle of "Big Blast of Science" by Bill Nye the Science Guy

I am seven books into the "Bible" by ?.

I have "God is not Great" by Christopher Hitchens, audio, read by the author, on order at the library.
 
Terrorist, John Updike
and
The Portrait of a Lady, Henry James.


How are you liking Terrorist? Just finished reading that a few weeks ago actually. Thought it was good and provocative but nothing that is memorable.

Right now i am reading- Our Man in Havana by Graham Greene and Siddhartha by Hermann Hesse.
Both good books so far, almost done with the latter.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom