Just finished in the last two months:
1). DEAD SOULS, by Nikolai Gogol. Very different than both Tosltoy and Dostoyevsky, being much earlier, but great in its own peculiar way.
2). GREAT EXPECTATIONS, by Charles Dickens. Great fun to read, with his usual magnificent characters. The conclusion has a bit of a deus ex machina feel to it, but it is done so well you don't mind.
3). The SHORT STORIES OF SAKI, by Saki (H. H. Munro). People were looking at me oddly, since I was walking in the street, reading this book, and laughing out loud. On a more serious note, his short essays about World War I (he was killed at the front in 1916), are as good as anything Orwell or Hashek ("The Good Soldier Schweik") ever wrote.
READING NOW:
1). ART: A NEW HISTORY by Paul Johnson. The good: Johnson concentrates on the art itself, not its theory. Clear writing, no technical jargon where it isn't needed. The bad: uses too many superlatives and often goes on about works that are not illustrated in the book, which defeats his purpose.
2). THE PLAGUE, by Albert Camus. Should be required reading these days, for reasons that those who read it understand.
1). DEAD SOULS, by Nikolai Gogol. Very different than both Tosltoy and Dostoyevsky, being much earlier, but great in its own peculiar way.
2). GREAT EXPECTATIONS, by Charles Dickens. Great fun to read, with his usual magnificent characters. The conclusion has a bit of a deus ex machina feel to it, but it is done so well you don't mind.
3). The SHORT STORIES OF SAKI, by Saki (H. H. Munro). People were looking at me oddly, since I was walking in the street, reading this book, and laughing out loud. On a more serious note, his short essays about World War I (he was killed at the front in 1916), are as good as anything Orwell or Hashek ("The Good Soldier Schweik") ever wrote.
READING NOW:
1). ART: A NEW HISTORY by Paul Johnson. The good: Johnson concentrates on the art itself, not its theory. Clear writing, no technical jargon where it isn't needed. The bad: uses too many superlatives and often goes on about works that are not illustrated in the book, which defeats his purpose.
2). THE PLAGUE, by Albert Camus. Should be required reading these days, for reasons that those who read it understand.