Welcome to the Twilight Zone

[R.Mackey]

So if this can't support both theories, which one does it support?

How hard did you look?

Oh, if you only knew what you were talking about.

I spend sixteen pages treating the cream of the eyewitness accounts -- as hand-selected and cherry picked by Dr. Griffin -- in my whitepaper. That includes the "flash flash flash" one you picked here. All of them, without exception, match perfectly normal phenomena vis-a-vis the NIST hypothesis, and make absolutely no sense to any conspiracist claim.

To pick at random, the "flash flash flash" one you describe was at the base of WTC 2, stated by Assistant Commissioner Stephen Gregory. Despite seeing "flashes," he didn't even see glass break... and he himself states that he doesn't think it was caused by explosives.

If that's all you've got, then you've brought a rusty spoon to a gunfight.

ETA: I treat Chief Cruthers too. You don't need to deal with his recollection, since he's describing something that's on video. And what's on video is consistent with NIST.

But, lets leave this for later. I will post my hypothesis.

I look forward to it. Very, very few hypotheses have been presented, and the majority are totally screwy, i.e. Max Photon's.

 

[Dr Adequate]

Just wanted to check ....

In Sizzler's (hypothetical) "Twilight Zone" the "New Commission" is still executing people for being part of an Inside Job and still refusing to divulge any evidence against their victims?

Then I am still (hypothetically) dedicated to overthrowing the "New Commission" and restoring justice and democracy.

 

[Gravy]

How hard did you look?

I looked thoroughly, with the goal of putting the witness accounts in context, unlike abject intellectual cowards like you. My evidence:

Did eyewitnesses report hearing or seeing bombs and demolitions explosives in and around the towers?

Accounts of structural instability in the Twin Towers, Bowing of columns, Collapse expected

Got it, "truther?"
.
Or do you have objections? If so, raise them now or forever hold your peace. Clear enough?

 

[Gravy]

Just wanted to check ....

In Sizzler's (hypothetical) "Twilight Zone" the "New Commission" is still executing people for being part of an Inside Job and still refusing to divulge any evidence against their victims?

Then I am still (hypothetically) dedicated to overthrowing the "New Commission" and restoring justice and democracy.

Here's the entire "New Commission" in action. She shouldn't be hard to hit with a paintball drive-by.

 

[Sizzler]

SPAM? again???

How many times are you going to post that picture Gravy?

Got any movies for me (that don't have errors in them within the first 2 minutes)?

Keep spamming away Gravy.....

 

[beachnut]

Here's the entire "New Commission" in action. She shouldn't be hard to hit with a paintball drive-by.

Looks like a group ready for action. Fact less and sitting around. Why is 9/11 truth filled with dirt dumb ideas?

If that's all you've got, then you've brought a rusty spoon to a gunfight.

 

[R.Mackey]

Is there a hypothesis in the house?

Sizzler, the time has come for you to present a hypothesis, or give up. Your arguments are nothing more than evasions, and hardly new or valid.

Great idea. I will post it later.

But, lets leave this for later. I will post my hypothesis.

I look forward to it. Very, very few hypotheses have been presented, and the majority are totally screwy, i.e. Max Photon's.

for Sizzler. I've been reminding you in other threads you've posted in. It's been five days. Have you given up yet?

 

[Sizzler]

for Sizzler. I've been reminding you in other threads you've posted in. It's been five days. Have you given up yet?

Hey Mackey. Thanks for the "kind" words of encouragement.

I've began an outline of my hypothesis. I'm in the middle of making a transition back to NA so my time is precious.

In honor of Gravy's departure I said I would write it so I will. Be patient though.